Traction–separation laws for progressive failure of bonded scarf repair of composite panel
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Repair of composites has become of considerable importance recently as modern commercial airliners employ much more composites in their airframes then previously. Major maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) centers must contend with issues of damage tolerance, efficiency, integrity and cost of repairs. Computational methods have been developed to sufficiently sophisticated levels to aid in the design, evaluation and optimization of proposed repair schemes before they are implemented, potentially saving time and cost. In this paper, parametric studies on progressive failure analysis of a bonded scarf repair of a composite panel was performed. The study finds that finite element models with an appropriate material property degradation scheme using the micromechanics of failure criterion are able to predict the failure load of undamaged and damaged specimen. Results of the parametric studies on adhesive properties suggest that the failure stress of a repaired composite panel is more sensitive to the strength of the cohesive elements than to its toughness when a linear or trapezoidal softening traction–separation law is used, but the influence of adhesive strength is not significant when exponential softening traction–separation law is used.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Material Mechanics · Fatigue and fracture mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. Progressive failure analysis of composites10.1177/0021998308093912 ↗
2. Micro-mechanics of failure (MMF) for continuous fiber reinforced composites10.1177/0021998308093911 ↗
3. Failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites
4. Failure analysis of FRP laminates by means of physically based phenomenological models10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00140-6 ↗
5. Cohesive and continuum mixed-mode damage models applied to the simulation of the mechanical behaviour of bonded joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.04.004 ↗
6. Numerical simulation of mixed-mode progressive delamination in composite materials10.1177/0021998303034505 ↗
7. Optimization of a composite scarf repair patch under tensile loading10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.04.033 ↗
8. Mall S, Johnson WS. Characterization of mode I and mixed-mode failure of adhesive bonds between composite adherends. In: composite materials: testing and design (seventh conference): A Conference: Philadelphia, PA, 2–4 April 1984. ASTM International; 1986.10.1520/STP35356S ↗
9. The stress-elongation relation for an adhesive layer loaded in peel using equilibrium of energetic forces10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2003.09.039 ↗
10. The effects of bond thickness, rate and temperature on the deformation and fracture of structural adhesives under shear loading10.1023/B:FRAC.0000049504.51847.2a ↗
11. The fracture resistance of a toughened epoxy adhesive10.1080/00218468108071189 ↗
12. Effect of bond thickness on fracture behaviour in adhesive joints10.1080/00218460108029592 ↗
13. Abaqus analysis user’s manual. Version 6.9. 2010.
14. Properties for graphite. Available from: ; 2000 [cited 2009, 22 June].