Surrogate-based multi-objective optimization of a composite laminate with curvilinear fibers
Source abstract
Abstract
A variable stiffness design can increase the structural performance of a composite plate and provides flexibility for trade-offs between structural properties. In this paper, we examine the simultaneous optimization of stiffness and buckling load of a composite laminate plate with curvilinear fiber paths. The problem, which falls in the area of multi-objective optimization, is formulated and solved through a surrogate-based optimization algorithm capable of finding the set of optimum Pareto solutions. We integrate surrogate modeling into an evolutionary algorithm to reduce the high computational cost required to solve the optimization process. The results show that a curvilinear fiber path can increase both buckling load and stiffness simultaneously over the quasi-isotropic laminate. Furthermore, the optimum direction for varying the fiber angle is dependent on the loading direction and boundary conditions. The results for a plate under uniform compression with free transverse edges shows that varying the fiber orientation perpendicular to the loading direction can increase the buckling load by 116% with respect to that of a quasi-isotropic laminate.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms · Topology Optimization in Engineering · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Optimum stacking sequence design of composite materials Part II: variable stiffness design10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.06.001 ↗
2. Evans DO, Vaniglia MM, Hopkins PC. Fiber placement process study. In: 34th International SAMPE symposium and exhibition. Reno, Nevada, USA; 1989. p. 1822–33.
3. Gürdal Z, Tatting BF, Wu KC. Tow-placement technology and fabrication issues for laminated composite structures. In: 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference. Austin, Texas; 2005. p. 1–17.10.2514/6.2005-2017 ↗
4. The use of curvilinear fiber format to improve buckling resistance of composite plates with central circular holes10.1016/0263-8223(91)90035-W ↗
5. On structural optimization of composite shell structures using a discrete constitutive parametrization10.1002/we.132 ↗
6. Design of variable-stiffness laminates using lamination parameters10.1016/j.compositesb.2005.12.001 ↗
7. Design of variable-stiffness composite panels for maximum buckling load10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.01.008 ↗
8. Optimization of variable-stiffness panels for maximum buckling load using lamination parameters10.2514/1.42490 ↗
9. In-plane response of laminates with spatially varying fiber orientations: variable stiffness concept10.2514/3.11613 ↗
10. Olmedo · 1993
11. Tatting BF, Gürdal Z. Design and manufacture of elastically tailored tow placed plates. NASA contractor report no NASA/CR-2002-211919; 2002.
12. Tatting BF, Gürdal Z. Automated finite element analysis of elastically-tailored plates. NASA contractor report no NASA/CR-2003-212679; 2003.
13. Optimal design of tow-placed fuselage panels for maximum strength with buckling considerations10.2514/1.40357 ↗
14. Variable stiffness composite panels: effects of stiffness variation on the in-plane and buckling response10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.11.015 ↗
15. Deb · 2001
16. Optimum stacking sequence design of composite materials Part I: constant stiffness design10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.01.006 ↗
17. Regression of the response surface of laminated composite structures10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00095-3 ↗
18. Stacking sequence optimization of laminated composite structures using genetic algorithm with local improvement10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00182-X ↗
19. Post-buckling optimization of composite stiffened panels: computations and experiments10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.11.047 ↗
20. Computational strategy for multiobjective optimization of composite stiffened panels10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.10.005 ↗
21. Vandervelde T, Milani AS. Layout optimization of a multi-zoned, multi-layered composite wing under free vibration. In: Proceedings of SPIE, the international society for optical engineering. San Diego, CA, USA; 2009.10.1117/12.813090 ↗
22. Adaptive response surface method – a global optimization scheme for approximation-based design problems10.1080/03052150108940940 ↗
23. Kollar · 2003
24. Turvey · 1995
25. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II10.1109/4235.996017 ↗
26. Muiltiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms10.1162/evco.1994.2.3.221 ↗
27. Deb K. A robust evolutionary framework for multi-objective optimization. ACM; 2008. p. 633–40.10.1145/1389095.1389223 ↗
28. Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization10.1016/j.paerosci.2008.11.001 ↗
29. Review of metamodeling techniques in support of engineering design optimization10.1115/1.2429697 ↗
30. A kriging metamodel assisted multi-objective genetic algorithm for design optimization10.1115/1.2829879 ↗