journal article·2020-11

A deep transfer learning model for inclusion defect detection of aeronautics composite materials

Yanfeng Gong, Hongliang Shao, Jun Luo, Zhixue Li

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Composite materials are increasingly used as structural components in military and civilian aircraft. To ensure their high reliability, numerous non-destructive testing (NDT) techniques have been used to detect defects during production and maintenance. However, most of these techniques are non-automatic, with diagnostic results determined subjectively by operators. Some deep learning methods have been proposed to identify defects in images obtained through NDT, but they need labeled image samples with defects, which can be expensive or unavailable. We propose a deep transfer learning model to accurately extract features for the inclusion of defects in X-ray images of aeronautics composite materials (ACM), whose samples are scarce. We researched an automatic inclusion defect detection method for X-ray images of ACM using our proposed model. Experimental results show that the model can reach 96% classification accuracy (F1_measure) with satisfactory detection results.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. A review of non-destructive testing methods of composite materials10.1016/j.prostr.2016.02.008 ↗
2. Nondestructive evaluation of aircraft composites using reflective terahertz time domain spectroscopy.10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.09.005 ↗
3. Comparison and analysis of Acoustography with other NDE techniques for foreign object inclusion detection in graphite epoxy composites10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.03.048 ↗
4. Motiian S, Piccirilli M, Adjeroh DA, Doretto G. Unified Deep Supervised Domain Adaptation and Generalization; 2017.10.1109/ICCV.2017.609 ↗
5. Aeronautics composite material inspection with a terahertz time-domain spectroscopy system10.1117/1.OE.53.3.031208 ↗
6. Noncontact detection of Teflon inclusions in glass-fiber-reinforced polymer composites using terahertz imaging10.1364/AO.55.010215 ↗
7. THz spectroscopy application for detection and localisation of water inclusion in glass composite10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.040 ↗
8. X-ray radiography and micro-computed tomography examination of damage characteristics in stitched composites subjected to impact loading10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.011 ↗
9. The quantification of impact damage distribution in composite laminates by analysis of X-ray computed tomograms10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.08.034 ↗
10. X-ray computed tomography of polymer composites
11. Damage mechanisms in thin stitched laminates subjected to low-velocity impact
12. Characterisation of voids in fibre reinforced composite materials
13. Measurement of voids in composites by X-ray Computed Tomography10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.09.019 ↗
14. X-ray computed microtomography of internal damage in fiber reinforced polymer matrix composites10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.014 ↗
15. Porosity and inclusion detection in CFRP by infrared thermography10.1155/2012/765953 ↗
16. Defect characterization in commercial carbon-carbon composites10.1260/1708-5284.9.6.481 ↗
17. Composite repair inspection by laser shearography
18. Characterisation of inclusions and disbonds in honeycomb composites using non-contact non-destructive testing techniques
19. A Comparative study of non-destructive evaluation of glass fiber reinforced polymer composites using terahertz, X-ray, and ultrasound imaging
20. Ramachandran R, Arunachalam K. Detection of dilute inclusion concentration in polymer metal composite using microwaves. In: International Microwave & Rf Conference; 2014. p.1–4.10.1109/IMaRC.2013.6777746 ↗
21. Nondestructive evaluation of forced delamination in glass fiber-reinforced composites by terahertz and ultrasonic waves10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.05.028 ↗
22. Computer vision technology for X-ray testing
23. On-line identification of holes/cracks in composite structures10.1088/0964-1726/10/4/303 ↗
24. Neural networks for inverse problems in damage identification and optical imaging10.2514/2.2004 ↗
25. Two-stage structural damage detection using fuzzy neural networks and data fusion techniques10.1016/j.eswa.2010.06.093 ↗
26. Anderson T, Lemoine G, Ambur D. An artificial neural network based damage detection scheme for electrically conductive composite structures. In: 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference; 2003. p. 1997.10.2514/6.2003-1997 ↗
27. Hierarchical development of training database for artificial neural network-based damage identification10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.06.029 ↗
28. Defect diagnostics of gas turbine engine using hybrid SVM-artificial neural network method10.1007/s12206-008-1119-9 ↗
29. Zheng SJ, Li ZQ, Wang HT. Research on delamination monitoring for composite structures based on HHGA-WNN2009.10.1016/j.asoc.2008.11.008 ↗
30. Detection of holes in a plate using global optimization and parameter identification techniques10.1080/17415971003624306 ↗
31. Automatic defect recognition in X-ray testing using computer vision
32. Ultrasonic signal classification and imaging system for composite materials via deep convolutional neural networks
33. Convolutional neural network for ultrasonic weldment flaw classification in noisy conditions10.1016/j.ultras.2018.12.001 ↗
34. Zhu Ca. Automatic detection of welding defects using deep neural network
35. Real-time vibration-based structural damage detection using one-dimensional convolutional neural networks10.1016/j.jsv.2016.10.043 ↗
36. Efficient feature selection for neural network based detection of flaws in steel welded joints using ultrasound testing10.1016/j.ultras.2016.08.017 ↗
37. Elenchezhian MRP, Vadlamudi V, Md Raihan R, Reifsnider K. Damage precursor identification in composite laminates using data driven approach. In: AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum; 2019. p. 0401.10.2514/6.2019-0401 ↗
38. Yosinski J, Clune J, Bengio Y, Lipson H. How transferable are features in deep neural networks? In: International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems; 2014. p. 3320–8.
39. A survey on transfer learning10.1109/TKDE.2009.191 ↗
40. Tan C, Sun F, Tao K, Zhang W, Chao Y, Liu C. A Survey on Deep Transfer Learning; 2018. p. 270–9.10.1007/978-3-030-01424-7_27 ↗
41. GDXray: the database of X-ray images for nondestructive testing10.1007/s10921-015-0315-7 ↗
42. Ganin Y, Lempitsky V. Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagation; 2015.
43. Goodfellow IJ, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, Bing X, Warde-Farley D, Ozair S, et al. Generative adversarial nets. In: International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems; 2014.p.2672-2680
44. Deep convolutional transfer learning network: a new method for intelligent fault diagnosis of machines with unlabeled data10.1109/TIE.2018.2877090 ↗
45. Barnes-Hut-SNE