journal article·2020-04Open access

Mechanics of bioinspired functionally graded soft-hard composites made by multi-material 3D printing

M.J. Mirzaali, A Herranz de la Nava, D. Gunashekar, M. Nouri-Goushki, R.P.E. Veeger, Q. Grossman, L. Angeloni, M.K. Ghatkesar, L.E. Fratila-Apachitei, D. Ruffoni, E.L. Doubrovski, A.A. Zadpoor

Abstract

Functional gradients are material transitions that are found in nature and are known to result in materials with superior properties and multiple functionalities. The emerging multi-material 3D printing (=additive manufacturing, AM) techniques provide a powerful tool for the design and fabrication of bioinspired functionally graded materials (FGMs). In particular, the spatial distribution of materials can be controlled at the level of individual volumetric pixels (voxels i.e., cubes with side lengths of 20–40 μm), thereby ensuring accuracy, reliability, and reproducibility of the obtained properties and allowing for systematic studies of how various design variables affect the deformation and fracture behaviors of FGMs. Here, we designed, 3D printed, and mechanically tested tensile and notched FGMs specimens with step-wise (i.e., 5-, 10-, and 15-steps) and continuous (sigmoid and linear) gradients. The deformation and fracture mechanisms of these FGM composites were studied using digital image correlation, digital microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. We further characterized the chemical composition and local mechanical properties of FGM composites using XPS and nanoindentation measurements, respectively. Tensile test specimens with a continuous gradient (i.e., linear) exhibited much higher Young's moduli (≈3-folds) and ultimate strengths (≈2-folds) but lower elongations (≈2-folds drop) as compared to those with stepwise gradients (i.e., 5-steps). Similarly, notched specimens with linear gradients exhibited 2-folds higher values of the stiffness and fracture stress, but 1.5-folds lower fracture strains as compared to those with 5-steps gradients. Although we found non-uniform highly concentrated strain distributions in all specimens, FGMs with linear gradients showed a smoother strain distribution and smaller crack blunting zones as compared to those with stepwise gradients. Our results imply that for stiffness and strength linear-gradient perform better than abrupt hard-soft-hard specimens.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. Biological materials: functional adaptations and bioinspired designs10.1016/j.pmatsci.2012.03.001 ↗
2. Artful interfaces within biological materials10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70056-6 ↗
3. Molecular mechanistic origin of the toughness of natural adhesives, fibres and composites10.1038/21607 ↗
4. How pine cones open10.1038/37745 ↗
5. Structure and mechanical properties of the soft zone separating bulk dentin and enamel in crowns of human teeth: insight into tooth function10.1016/j.jsb.2005.10.010 ↗
6. The skeletal attachment of tendons—tendon â€̃entheses’10.1016/S1095-6433(02)00138-1 ↗
7. The transition from stiff to compliant materials in squid beaks10.1126/science.1154117 ↗
8. Porosity and specific surface of bone
9. Two different correlations between nanoindentation modulus and mineral content in the bone–cartilage interface10.1016/j.jsb.2004.10.010 ↗
10. Histomorphometric analysis of adult articular calcified cartilage zone10.1016/j.jsb.2009.08.010 ↗
11. Tendons and ligaments-an overview
12. Biomechanics of the lumbar intervertebral disk: a review10.1093/ptj/60.6.765 ↗
13. The design of soft collagenous load-bearing tissues10.1242/jeb.202.23.3315 ↗
14. The cartilage-bone interface10.1055/s-0032-1319782 ↗
15. The basic science of articular cartilage: structure, composition, and function10.1177/1941738109350438 ↗
16. Functionally graded composites: Processing and applications
17. Functionally graded materials: a critical review
18. Inhomogeneous materials perform better: functionally graded materials for biomedical application
19. Thermoelastic analysis of non-uniform pressurized functionally graded cylinder with variable thickness using first order shear deformation theory (fsdt) and perturbation method10.3901/CJME.2015.0429.048 ↗
20. Functionally graded materials: a review of fabrication and properties10.1016/j.apmt.2016.10.001 ↗
21. 3d printing of materials with tunable failure via bioinspired mechanical gradients10.1002/adma.201705808 ↗
22. Biological and bioinspired composites with spatially tunable heterogeneous architectures10.1002/adfm.201300340 ↗
23. Biomimetic tendon extracellular matrix composite gradient scaffold enhances ligament-to-bone junction reconstruction10.1016/j.actbio.2017.05.027 ↗
24. On the biomechanical function of scaffolds for engineering load-bearing soft tissues10.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.001 ↗
25. Strategies to engineer tendon/ligament-to-bone interface: biomaterials, cells and growth factors10.1016/j.addr.2015.03.004 ↗
26. Gradient biomaterials for soft-to-hard interface tissue engineering10.1016/j.actbio.2011.01.011 ↗
27. Scaffold: a novel carrier for cell and drug delivery10.1615/CritRevTherDrugCarrierSyst.v29.i1.10 ↗
28. and Seeram Ramakrishna. Electrospinning and electrospray of bio-based and natural polymers for biomaterials development10.1016/j.msec.2018.08.004 ↗
29. Magnetically actuated functional gradient nanocomposites for strong and ultra-durable biomimetic interfaces/surfaces10.1039/C7MH00223H ↗
30. Slanted functional gradient micropillars for optimal bioinspired dry adhesion10.1021/acsnano.7b07493 ↗
31. Bioinspired wear-resistant and ultradurable functional gradient coatings10.1002/smll.201802717 ↗
32. Scaffold design and fabrication technologies for engineering tissues—state of the art and future perspectives10.1163/156856201744489 ↗
33. Drop-on-demand inkjet bioprinting: a primer10.1142/S1568558611000258 ↗
34. 3d bioprinting of tissues and organs10.1038/nbt.2958 ↗
35. Voxel-based fabrication through material property mapping: A design method for bitmap printing10.1016/j.cad.2014.05.010 ↗
36. 3d printing for the design and fabrication of polymer-based gradient scaffolds10.1016/j.actbio.2017.03.030 ↗
37. Length-scale dependency of biomimetic hard-soft composites10.1038/s41598-018-30012-9 ↗
38. 3D bioprinting: an emerging technology full of opportunities and challenges10.1007/s42242-018-0004-3 ↗
39. An overview of functionally graded additive manufacturing
40. Processing techniques for functionally graded materials10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00578-1 ↗
41. Rasheedat M Mahamood, Esther T Akinlabi, Mukul Shukla, Sisa Pityana. Functionally graded material: an overview; 2012.
42. Talreja · 2012
43. Valmik Bhavar, Prakash Kattire, Sandeep Thakare, RKP Singh, etal. A review on functionally gradient materials (fgms) and their applications. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, volume 229, page 012021. IOP Publishing; 2017.10.1088/1757-899X/229/1/012021 ↗
44. KJIS. 7161-1994: Plastics—determination of tensile properties—part 1: General principles. Japanese Standards Association; 1994.
45. Multi-material 3d printed mechanical metamaterials: Rational design of elastic properties through spatial distribution of hard and soft phases10.1063/1.5064864 ↗
46. A comparison of jkr-based methods to analyze quasi-static and dynamic indentation force curves10.1016/j.jcis.2005.12.062 ↗
47. Eliminating adhesion errors in nanoindentation of compliant polymers and hydrogels10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.02.002 ↗
48. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments10.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
49. Fracture behavior of bio-inspired functionally graded soft–hard composites made by multi-material 3d printing: the case of colinear cracks10.3390/ma12172735 ↗
50. Dental implants from functionally graded materials: dental Implants from FGM
51. Rob BN Scharff, Rens M Doornbusch, XanderL Klootwijk, AjinkyaA Doshi, EugeniL Doubrovski, Jun Wu, Jo MP Geraedts, and CharlieCL Wang. Color-based sensing of bending deformation on soft robots. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 1–7. IEEE; 2018.10.1109/ICRA.2018.8460521 ↗
52. 3d printing of robotic soft actuators with programmable bioinspired architectures10.1038/s41467-018-03216-w ↗
53. Mechanical meta-materials10.1039/C6MH00065G ↗
54. Ultra-programmable buckling-driven soft cellular mechanisms10.1039/C9MH00125E ↗
55. Level-set topology optimization for multimaterial and multifunctional mechanical metamaterials10.1080/0305215X.2016.1164853 ↗
56. Multi-material additive manufacturing of metamaterials with giant, tailorable negative poisson’s ratios
57. Grayscale digital light processing 3d printing for highly functionally graded materials10.1126/sciadv.aav5790 ↗
58. Kaweesa and Nicholas A Meisel. Quantifying fatigue property changes in material jetted parts due to functionally graded material interface design
59. Stepwise graded struts for maximizing energy absorption in lattices10.1016/j.eml.2018.10.006 ↗