Bonded versus unbonded strip fiber reinforced elastomeric isolators: Finite element analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents a finite element (FE) model for the analysis of strip fiber reinforced elastomeric isolators (FREIs) that are subjected to any given combination of static vertical and lateral loads. The model is able to simulate both bonded and unbonded boundary conditions at the top and bottom contact surfaces of the isolator. Compared to bonded (B)-FREIs, the FE-analysis of stable unbonded (SU)-FREIs presents additional analysis challenges. SU-FREI refers to unbonded FREIs that exhibit stable rollover deformation under lateral loads. Additional analysis challenges are attributed to changes in the boundary conditions of SU-FREI as a result of rollover type deformation. To address these challenges, the utilized FE-mesh is updated during analysis consistent with the deformed geometry of the isolator. Using the proposed FE-model, the lateral responses of a B-FREI and a SU-FREI were evaluated. Both isolators had the same material and geometrical properties and were subjected to identical constant vertical loading. Comparing the lateral responses, it was found that the SU-FREI was considerably more efficient than the B-FREI as a seismic isolator. In addition, the in-service stress demands on the SU-FREI were found to be significantly lower than the B-FREI.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis · Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Analysis of fiber-reinforced elastomeric isolators
2. Seismic isolation systems for developing countries10.1193/1.1503339 ↗
3. Design and manufacturing of fiber reinforced elastomeric isolator for seismic isolation10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00713-6 ↗
4. Hole and lead plug effect on fiber reinforced elastomeric isolator for seismic isolation10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00798-2 ↗
5. Testing and modeling of square carbon fiber-reinforced elastomeric seismic isolators10.1002/stc.225 ↗
6. Lateral response evaluation of fiber-reinforced neoprene seismic isolators utilized in an unbonded application10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:10(1627) ↗
7. Parametric study on the response of stable unbonded fiber-reinforced elastomeric isolators (SU-FREIs)10.1177/0021998308106322 ↗
8. Design, manufacturing and evaluation of the performance of steel like fiber reinforced elastomeric seismic isolators10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.06.023 ↗
9. An innovative earthquake isolation system using fibre reinforced rubber bearings10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.03.010 ↗
10. Dynamic analysis of fiber-reinforced elastomeric isolation structures10.1007/s12206-008-1214-y ↗
11. Shake table study on an ordinary low-rise building seismically isolated with SU-FREIs (stable unbonded fiber-reinforced elastomeric isolators)10.1002/eqe.923 ↗
12. Tsai HC, Kelly JM. Stiffness analysis of fiber-reinforced elastomeric isolators. PEER Report 2001/05, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California; 2001.
13. Compression stiffness of infinite-strip bearings of laminated elastic material interleaving with flexible reinforcements10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.06.005 ↗
14. Compression stiffness of circular bearings of laminated elastic material interleaving with flexible reinforcements10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.05.012 ↗
15. Elastic layers bonded to flexible reinforcements10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.08.029 ↗
16. Buckling of short beams with warping effect included10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.07.021 ↗
17. Buckling load of seismic isolators affected by flexibility of reinforcement10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.07.020 ↗
18. Toopchi-Nezhad H, Tait MJ, Drysdale RG. Stiffness analysis of fiber-reinforced rubber isolators under compressive loads: a finite element approach. In: Proceedings of the 9th US national and 10th Canadian conference on earthquake engineering, Toronto, Ontario; 2010.
19. On highly compressible helical springs and rubber rods, and their application for vibration-free mountings – part III
20. ASCE-7. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, ASCE/SEI 7-05. New York, American Society of Civil Engineers; 2005.
21. MSC. Marc. Santa Ana, CA: MSC Software Corporation; 2008.
22. Zienkiewicz · 2000 · vol. 1, 5th ed.
23. MSC Software Corporation. Nonlinear finite element analysis of elastomers, Technical paper. Los Angeles, CA: MSC Software Corporation; 2000.
24. Elasticity equations for incompressible and nearly incompressible materials by a variational theorem10.2514/3.3277 ↗
25. MSC. Mrac. Theory and user information, vol. A. Santa Ana, CA: MSC Software Corporation; 2008.
26. Kelly · 1997