journal article·2018-04

Modelling and simulation methodology for unidirectional composite laminates in a Virtual Test Lab framework

O. Falcó, R.L. Ávila, B. Tijs, C.S. Lopes

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract A reliable virtual testing framework for unidirectionally laminated composites is presented that allows the prediction of failure loads and modes of general in-plane coupons with great realism. This is a toolset based on finite element analysis that relies on a cohesive-frictional constitutive formulation coupled with the kinematics of penalty-based contact surfaces, on sophisticated three-dimensional continuum damage models, and overall on a modelling approach based on mesh structuring and crack-band erosion to capture the appropriate crack paths in unidirectional fibre reinforced plies. An extensive and rigorous validation of the overall approach is presented, demonstrating that the virtual testing laboratory is robust and can be reliably used in for composite materials screening, design and certification.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (78)

Show source-provided references
1. Multiscale virtual testing: the roadmap to efficient design of composites for damage resistance and tolerance10.1007/s13272-016-0210-7 ↗
2. The open hole tensile test: a challenge for virtual testing of composites10.1007/s10704-009-9333-8 ↗
3. Progressive damage modelling of open-hole composite laminates under compression10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.12.022 ↗
4. An experimental and numerical investigation into the damage mechanisms in notched composites10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.02.021 ↗
5. Modelling the interaction between matrix craks and delamination damage in scaled quasi-isotropic specimens10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.05.038 ↗
6. Application of cohesive zone elements in damage analysis of composites: strength prediction of a single-bolted joint in CFRP laminates10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2014.04.006 ↗
7. Mesh-independent modeling of both distributed and discrete matrix cracking in interaction with delamination in composites10.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.11.010 ↗
8. A stable X-FEM in cohesive transition from closed to open crack10.1002/nme.4809 ↗
9. Chen BY, Tay TE. Progressive damage in fibre-reinforced composites: towards more accurate and efficient computational modelling and analysis. In: The Structural Integrity of Carbon Fiber Composites; 2017. p. 391–423.10.1007/978-3-319-46120-5_15 ↗
10. Modelling the tensile failure of composites with the floating node method10.1016/j.cma.2016.05.027 ↗
11. Numerical analysis of size effects on open-hole tensile composite laminates10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.12.001 ↗
12. Modelling delamination migration in angle-ply laminates10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.02.010 ↗
13. Modeling delamination migration in cross-ply tape laminates10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.01.021 ↗
14. ABAQUS version 6.14 online documentation. Analysis user’s manual, SIMULIA Inc., Dassault Systèmes; 2013.
15. Physically-sound simulation of low-velocity impact on fibre reinforced laminates10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.05.014 ↗
16. Modelling and simulation of two-drop effects arising from the manufacturing of steered-fibre composites10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.11.015 ↗
17. Measurement of mixed-mode delamination fracture toughness of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites with mixed-mode bending apparatus10.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-X ↗
18. Numerical simulation of mixed-mode progressive delamination in composite materials10.1177/0021998303034505 ↗
19. A damage model for the simulation of delamination in advanced composites under variable-mode loading10.1016/j.mechmat.2005.10.003 ↗
20. A thermodynamics-based cohesive model for interface debonding and friction10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.10.032 ↗
21. A continuum damage model for composite laminates: Part i – constitutive model10.1016/j.mechmat.2007.03.005 ↗
22. A continuum damage model for composite laminates: Part ii – computational implementation and validation10.1016/j.mechmat.2007.03.006 ↗
23. Ramberg W, Osgood W. Description of stress strain curves by three parameters. National Advisory Committee For Aeronautics; 1943. Technical Note No. 902.
24. Rose CA, Dávila CG, Frank AL. Analysis methods for progressive damage of composite structures, Technical Report NASA/TM-2013-218024, NASA; 2013.
25. Three-dimensional failure criteria for fiber-reinforced laminates10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.07.016 ↗
26. A procedure for superposing linear cohesive laws to represent multiple damage mechanisms in the fracture of composites10.1007/s10704-009-9366-z ↗
27. Modeling the inelastic deformation and fracture of polymer composites part ii: smeared crack model10.1016/j.mechmat.2012.12.001 ↗
28. Computational micromechanics of fiber kinking in unidirectional FRP under different environmental conditions10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.03.014 ↗
29. Determination of tensile and compressive moduli by flexural tests10.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.05.003 ↗
30. ASTM. Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials, Technical Report, American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), West Conshohocken, PA, USA; 2000. ASTM D 3039/D 3039M-00.
31. ASTM. Standard test method for compressive properties of unidirectional or cross-ply fibre-resin composites. Technical Report, American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), West Conshohocken, PA, USA; 1987. ASTM D 3410-87.
32. ASTM. Standard test method for in-plane shear response of polymer matrix composite materials by test of a ±45° laminate. Technical Report, American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), West Conshohocken, PA, USA; 1994. ASTM D3518/3518M-94.
33. Prediction of in situ strengths and matrix cracking in composites under transverse tension and in-plane shear10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.04.023 ↗
34. ASTM. Standard Test Method for Short-Beam Strength of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials and Their Laminates. Technical Report, American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), West Conshohocken, PA, USA; 2000. ASTM D 2344-2344M(2000).
35. Llorca J, González C, Molina-Aldaregúa J, Lópes CS. Multiscale modeling of composites: Toward virtual testingand beyond, JOM 65; 2013. p. 215–25.10.1007/s11837-012-0509-8 ↗
36. Transverse cracking of cross-ply laminates: a computational micromechanics perpective10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.02.008 ↗
37. Computational micromechanics of the transverse and shear behavior of unidirectional fiber reinforced polymers including environmental effects10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.06.018 ↗
38. Structural composites for multifuncional application: current challenges and future trends10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.04.005 ↗
39. Fracture toughness of the tensile and compressive fibre failure modes in laminated composites10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.12.023 ↗
40. Measurement of the in situ ply fracture toughness associated with mode i fibre tensile failure in FRP. part II: Size and lay-up effects10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.12.011 ↗
41. Measurement of the compressive crack resistance curve of composites using the size effect law10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.10.017 ↗
42. ASTM. Standard test methods for mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of unidirectional fibre-reinforced polymer matrix composites. Technical Report, American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), West Conshohocken, PA, USA; 2001. ASTM D 5528-01.
43. ASTM. Standard Test Method for Determination of the Mode II Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites. Technical Report. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2014. ASTM D 7905M(2014).
44. ASTM. Standard Test Method for Mixed Mode I-Mode II Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Fiber Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites. Technical Report, American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), West Conshohocken, PA, USA; 2004. ASTM D 6671/D 6671M-03.
45. Analysis of mode II interlaminar fracture of multidirectional laminates
46. Sebaey · 2013
47. Mouri · 2015
48. Coefficient of friction of composite delamination surfaces10.1016/S0043-1648(99)00315-4 ↗
49. Crack band theory for fracture of concrete
50. Maimí · 2006
51. A continuum damage model for composite laminates – part II: Computational implementation and validation10.1016/j.mechmat.2007.03.006 ↗
52. Analysis of rotating crack model10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:8(842) ↗
53. Rotating crack model with transition to scalar damage10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:3(277) ↗
54. Variable-stiffness composite panels: As-manufactured modeling and its influence on the failure behavior10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.09.003 ↗
55. Ten-deg off-axis test for shear properties in fiber composites10.1007/BF02326320 ↗
56. Prickett · 2001
57. Predicting the crushing behaviour of composite material using high-fidelity finite element modelling10.1080/13588265.2014.972122 ↗
58. AITM1-0007. Determination of Plain, Open Hole and Filled Hole Tensile Strength. Technical Report, (Airbus Industrie Test Method); 2004.
59. AITM1-0008. Determination of Plain, Open Hole and Filled Hole Compression Strength. Technical Report, (Airbus Industrie Test Method); 2010.
60. ASTMD6484/D6484M-04. Standard Test Method for Open-Hole Compressive Strength of Polymer Matrix Composite Laminates. Technical Report, American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM); 2004.
61. ASTMD5766/D5766M-02a. Standard Test Method for Open Hole Tensile Strength of Polymer Matrix Composite Laminates, Technical Report, American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM); 2002.
62. Multiple length/time-scale simulation of localized damage in composite structures using a mesh superposition technique10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.005 ↗
63. Damage resistance and damage tolerance of dispersed CFRP laminates: design and optimization10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.07.005 ↗
64. Deuschle · 2010
65. Failure analysis of FRP laminates by means of physically based phenomenological models10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00208-1 ↗
66. The role of delamination in strength, failure mechanism and hole size effect in open hole tensile test on quasi-isotropic laminates10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.12.013 ↗
67. NCAMP, Hexcel 8552 AS4 Unidirectional Prepeg Qualification Statical Analysis Report. Technical Report, National Center for Advanced Materials Performance; 2011. CAM-RP-2010-002 May 6, Revision A.
68. DOT/FAA/AR-02/109. Guidelines and Recommended Criteria for the Development of a Material Specification for Carbon Fiber/Epoxy Unidirectional Prepregs. Technical Report, National Technical Information Service (NTIS), Office of Aviation Research, D.C. 20591; 2003.
69. ASTMD6641/D6641M-01e1. Standard Test Method for Determining the Compressive Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Laminates Using a Combined Loading Compression (CLC) Test Fixture, Technical Report, American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM); 2001.
70. ASTMD3410/D3410M-03. Standard Test Method for Compressive Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials with Unsupported Gage Section by Shear Loading. Technical Report, American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM); 2003.
71. NASA Contractor Report 198285. Compression Testing of Textile Composite Materials, Technical Report, NASA; 1996.
72. ASTMD3039/D3039M-00. Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials. Technical Report, American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM); 2000.
73. Variable-stiffness composite panels: Defect tolerance under in-plane tensile loading10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.03.022 ↗
74. An experimental investigation into the tensile strength scaling of notched composites10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.07.008 ↗
75. Size effect in unnotched tensile strength of unidirectional and quasi-isotropic carbon/epoxy composites10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.06.002 ↗
76. A new two-dimensional hybrid grid generation method based on improved hole cutting10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2014.03.015 ↗
77. Implicit hole cutting a new approach to overset grid connectivity
78. A cell-based point-in-polygon algorithm suitable for large sets of points10.1016/S0098-3004(01)00037-1 ↗