A review of composite lattice structures
Source abstract
Abstract
Composite materials have now been adopted in a wide range of applications, primarily due to their weight-saving potential. Overwhelmingly so, these materials have been used in laminated or monolithic structural components. Moving towards lattice configurations, in which the structure is formed from a network of connected members, can offer unparalleled structural efficiencies. From a structural standpoint, composites are ideal materials for the formation of lattice structures as their anisotropic properties can be exploited within the mainly uniaxially stressed members. However, from a manufacturing standpoint, they present a range of challenges that, so far, has largely limited their application within industry. Within this field, there is now a wide range of different approaches to creating composite lattice structures that are under development. This paper organises and assesses the current work on these technologies, with the core focus being on their associated manufacturing methodologies. Three main classifications are identified based on the geometry and intended use of the structure, and progress made in each is highlighted alongside key remaining hurdles to widespread implementation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Structural Analysis and Optimization · Advanced Materials and Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. The optimal selection of material and section-shape10.1080/09544829608907932 ↗
2. Chen · 1997
3. Anisogrid composite lattice structures for spacecraft and aircraft applications10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.06.025 ↗
4. Lightweight carbon fibre rods and truss structures10.1016/S0261-3069(97)00056-3 ↗
5. Adaptive lightweight CFRP strut for active vibration damping in truss structures10.1177/1045389X9600700408 ↗
6. Jensen D, Redford M, Francom L. On the structural efficiency of three-dimensional isogrid designs. In: 37th Struct Struct Dyn Mater Conf, pp. 1704–1710, 1996, doi: doi:10.2514/6.1996-1508.10.2514/6.1996-1508 ↗
7. Francom LR, Jensen DW. Three-dimensional IsoTruss structure; 13-Jul-1999.
8. Mechanical characterization of a graphite/epoxy IsoTruss10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2000)13:1(23) ↗
9. Local and global buckling of ultra-lightweight IsoTruss® structures10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.038 ↗
10. Hansen SM, Jensen DW. Influence of consolidation and interweaving on compression behavior of IsoTruss structures. Des Nat II 2004.
11. Buckling analyses of double-shell octagonal lattice truss composite structures10.1177/0021998317723446 ↗
12. Failure analysis of 1D lattice truss composite structure in uniaxial compression10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.09.003 ↗
13. A flexible tooling and local consolidation process to manufacture 1D lattice truss composite structure10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.03.018 ↗
14. Sui Q, Lai C, Fan H. Buckling failure modes of one-dimensional lattice truss composite structures. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 2018; 232(13): pp. 2565–2583, doi: 10.1177/0954410017716194.10.1177/0954410017716194 ↗
15. Fundamental frequency of IsoTruss tubular composite structures10.1007/s00419-017-1308-z ↗
16. Jensen DW. Using External Robots Instead of Internal Mandrels to Produce Composite Lattice Structures. In: International Conference on Textile Composites (TEXCOMP10); 2010.
17. Jensen DHAD, Jensen MJ. Continuous manufacturing of cylindirical composite lattice structures. In: International Conference on Textile Composites (TEXCOMP10); 2010.
18. Matthew Hansen S, Matthew S. Influence of consolidation and interweaving on compression behavior of IsoTrussTM structures BYU ScholarsArchive Citation; 2004.
19. Jensen MJ, Howcroft AD, Jensen DW. Design of an IsoTruss aircraft strut. In: SAMPE 2011 - Long Beach CA - May 23-26 / 2011; 2011.
20. “IsoTruss Industries LLC.” [Online]. Available: www.IsoTruss.com. [Accessed: 09-Apr-1992].
21. Jensen DW, Blake RR. Compression and;-flexure of graphite/epoxy IsoTruss-reinforced concrete. In: SAMPE 1999 - Long Beach CA - May 23-27 / 1999; 1999, pp. 23–27.
22. Jensen DW, Hinds KB. Shear-dominated bending behavior of carbon / epoxy composite lattice IsoBeam Structures. In: 20th International Conference on Composite Materials; 2015.
23. Asay BA, Jensen DW. Bending behavior of carbon/epoxy composite IsoBeam structures. In: SAMPE 2016 - Long Beach CA - May 23-26; 2016.
24. Berry B, et al. Design optimization of Gamera II: A human powered helicopter. In: Annu Forum Proc - AHS Int, vol. 1, no. January 2012, pp. 646–664, 2012.
25. Woods B, Otto Berry B, Bohdan Stavnychyi V. Continuous wound composite truss structures. US2013/0291709; 2013.
26. Ultra-efficient wound composite truss structures10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.06.022 ↗
27. WrapToR composite truss structures: Improved process and structural efficiency10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111467 ↗
28. WrapToR composite truss structures: Measurement and modelling of mechanical response
29. Flexural properties of lightweight FRP composite truss structures10.1177/0021998311410237 ↗
30. Multi-parameter optimization of lightweight composite triangular truss structure based on response surface methodology10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.10.025 ↗
31. The detection of defects in GRP lattice structures by vibration measurements10.1016/0963-8695(91)90143-Q ↗
32. The design of optimal lattice structures manufactured by maypole braiding10.1115/1.4031122 ↗
33. Brougton RM, Branscomb DJ, Beale DG. MINMAL WEIGHT COMPOSITES USING OPEN STRUCTURE. US 2015/0056449, 2015.
34. Branscomb D, Beale D, Broughton R. New directions in braiding. J Eng Fiber Fabr 2013; 8(2): p. 155892501300800, doi: 10.1177/155892501300800202.10.1177/155892501300800202 ↗
35. A general approach to fast prototype the topology of braided structures10.1016/j.ijengsci.2018.06.006 ↗
36. Shen Y, Branscomb D, Adanur S. Effect of joint stiffness on torsional stiffness of open lattice composite structures. J Ind Text p. 152808371988181, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1177/1528083719881818.10.1177/1528083719881818 ↗
37. McAllister QP, Senne J, Romanyszyn A, Kolozs R. Development of continuous advanced composite truss printing system. In: 3rd AIAA Spacecraft Structures Conference, 2016, no. January, pp. 1–18, doi: 10.2514/6.2016-1705.10.2514/6.2016-1705 ↗
38. Hoyt AR, et al. “SpiderFab TM: Process for On-Orbit Construction of Kilometer- Scale Apertures NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC); 2016.
39. Hoyt RP, Cushing J, Slostad J, Jimmerson G. TRUSSELATOR: On-Orbit Fabrication of High-Performance Composite Truss Structures. In: AIAA SPACE 2014 Conference and Exposition, 2014, no. August, pp. 1–10, doi: 10.2514/6.2014-4337.10.2514/6.2014-4337 ↗
40. Hoyt RP, Slostad J, Cushing J, Moser T. In-Space Manufacturing of ConstructableTM Long-Baseline Sensors using the TrusselatorTM Technology. In: AIAA SPACE 2016, 2016, no. September, p. 5244, doi: 10.2514/6.2016-5244.10.2514/6.2016-5244 ↗
41. Structural synthesis capability for integrally stiffened waffle plates10.2514/3.2178 ↗
42. Knighton DJ. Delta launch vehicle isogrid structure Nastran analysis; 1972.
43. Anisogrid lattice structures – survey of development and application10.1016/S0263-8223(01)00111-8 ↗
44. Anisogrid composite lattice structures - Development and aerospace applications10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.10.023 ↗
45. Vasiliev VV, Barynin VA, Rasin AF. Anisogrid lattice structures ± survey of development and application.
46. Study of filament wound grid-stiffened composite cylindrical structures10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.06.003 ↗
47. Ming Li, Fangfang Sun, Changliang Lai, Hualin Fan, Bin Ji, Xi Zhang, Debo Liu, Daining Fang, Fabrication and testing of composite hierarchical Isogrid stiffened cylinder, Composites Science and Technology, Volume 157, 2018, Pages 152-159, ISSN 0266-3538, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.01.040.10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.01.040 ↗
48. Manufacture of high performance isogrid structure by Robotic Filament Winding10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.061 ↗
49. Fabrication and testing of thin composite isogrid stiffened panel10.1016/S0263-8223(99)00122-1 ↗
50. Interlocked composite grids design and manufacturing10.1177/0021998303037004681 ↗
51. A study on grid-stiffened multi-functional composite structures with radiation spot shielding10.1016/j.ast.2016.05.002 ↗
52. The effects of delamination deficiencies on compressive properties of composite grid-stiffened structures10.1080/15376494.2017.1310337 ↗
53. Zhao C, Donough MJ, Gangadhara Prusty B, Xiao J. Influences of ply waviness and discontinuity on automated fibre placement manufactured grid stiffeners. Compos Struct 2020; 256(August 2020): p. 113106, doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113106.10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113106 ↗
54. Jadhav P, Raju Mantena P, Gibson RF. Energy absorption and damage evaluation of grid stiffened composite panels under transverse loading. Compos Part B Eng 2005; 37(2–3), pp. 191–199, doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2005.05.017.10.1016/j.compositesb.2005.05.017 ↗
55. A novel all-composite blast-resistant door structure with hierarchical stiffeners10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.03.066 ↗
56. Velicki A, Jegley D. Prseus development for the hybrid wing body aircraft. AIAA Centen Nav Aviat Forum “100 Years Achiev Progress, no. September; 2011. pp. 1–11, doi: 10.2514/6.2011-7025.10.2514/6.2011-7025 ↗
57. Resin film infusion of stitched stiffened composite panels10.1016/S1359-835X(03)00002-2 ↗
58. Concurrent design and manufacture of a thermoplastic composite stiffener10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.01.033 ↗
59. Sandwich panels with Kagome lattice cores reinforced by carbon fibers10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.09.011 ↗
60. Interlocking orthogrid: An efficient way to construct lightweight lattice-core sandwich composite structure10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.029 ↗
61. Manufacturing and testing of a CFRC sandwich cylinder with Kagome cores10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.08.012 ↗
62. On the limitations of processing CFRP material using automated fibre placement technology10.1177/0731684416659544 ↗
63. Kim BC, Zympeloudis E. Improvement of fibre placement accuracy in continuous tow shearing process. In: 20th Int Conf Compos Mater, no. July, pp. 19–24, 2015.
64. Compressive strength of composite lattice structures10.1177/073168449801700505 ↗
65. Carbon fiber reinforced hierarchical orthogrid stiffened cylinder: Fabrication and testing10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.01.064 ↗
66. van den Brink W, Vankan W. Design for manufacturing of fuselage panels with curved grid stiffening. Porto; 2014.
67. Tsai SW, Manne P. Manufacturing of Composite Grid Structures. Stanford; 1996.
68. Sterk S, van der Brink W. Dimensionally Stable CFRP Grid Stiffened Structures for Space Applications Dimensionally Stable CFRP Grid Stiffened Structures for Space Applications; 2020.
69. Chen L, Fan H, Sun F, Zhao L, Fang D. Improved manufacturing method and mechanical performances of carbon fiber reinforced lattice-core sandwich cylinder. Thin-Walled Struct 2013; 68: pp. 75–84, doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2013.03.002.10.1016/j.tws.2013.03.002 ↗
70. Sandwich panels with Kagome lattice cores reinforced by carbon fibers10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.09.011 ↗
71. The properties of foams and lattices10.1098/rsta.2005.1678 ↗
72. Mechanical properties of hierarchical cellular materials. Part I: Analysis10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.09.022 ↗
73. Mechanics of advanced fiber reinforced lattice composites10.1007/s10409-010-0390-z ↗
74. Finnegan VSDK, Kooistra G, Wadley HNG. The compressive response of carbon fiber composite pyramidal truss sandwich cores; 2007, doi: 10.3139/146.101594.10.3139/146.101594 ↗
75. The compressive response of carbon fiber composite pyramidal truss sandwich cores10.3139/146.101594 ↗
76. Mechanical behaviors and bending effects of carbon fiber reinforced lattice materials10.1007/s00419-006-0032-x ↗
77. Multifunctional periodic cellular metals10.1098/rsta.2005.1697 ↗
78. Design and manufacturing of a composite lattice structure reinforced by continuous carbon fibers10.1016/S1007-0214(06)70228-0 ↗
79. Che L, Dong Xu G, Zeng T, Cheng S, Wei Zhou X, Cai Yang S. Compressive and shear characteristics of an octahedral stitched sandwich composite. Compos Struct 2014; 112(1), pp. 179–187, doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.02.012.10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.02.012 ↗
80. A composite sandwich panel integrally woven with truss core10.1016/j.matdes.2014.08.064 ↗
81. Response of composite sandwich beams with graded lattice core10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.09.042 ↗
82. The fabrication and mechanical properties of novel composite lattice structures10.1016/j.matdes.2015.11.112 ↗
83. Analysis of the compression behaviour of different composite lattice designs10.1177/0021998317714531 ↗
84. Impulsive response of composite sandwich structure with tetrahedral truss core10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.03.020 ↗
85. Fabrication and testing of carbon fiber reinforced truss core sandwich panels
86. Mechanical behavior of the sandwich structures with carbon fiber-reinforced pyramidal lattice truss core10.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.061 ↗
87. Mechanical behaviour of CFRP sandwich structures with tetrahedral lattice truss cores10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.11.017 ↗
88. The effect of temperature on the bending properties and failure mechanism of composite truss core sandwich structures10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.09.017 ↗
89. Mechanical behavior and failure mechanisms of carbon fiber composite pyramidal core sandwich panel after thermal exposure10.1016/j.jmst.2013.04.013 ↗
90. Pyramidal lattice sandwich structures with hollow composite trusses10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.06.025 ↗
91. Hybrid truss concepts for carbon fiber composite pyramidal lattice structures10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.01.033 ↗
92. Bending behavior of graded corrugated truss core composite sandwich beams10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.11.057 ↗
93. Hybrid core carbon fiber composite sandwich panels: Fabrication and mechanical response10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.10.002 ↗
94. Hybrid carbon fiber composite lattice truss structures10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.06.011 ↗
95. Fabrication and crushing behavior of low density carbon fiber composite pyramidal truss structures10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.03.010 ↗
96. Xiong J, Ma L, Wu L, Liu J, Vaziri A. Composites: Part B Mechanical behavior and failure of composite pyramidal truss core sandwich columns. vol. 42, pp. 938–945, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.12.021.10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.12.021 ↗
97. Shear and bending performance of carbon fiber composite sandwich panels with pyramidal truss cores10.1016/j.actamat.2011.11.028 ↗
98. Structural responses of all-composite improved-pyramidal truss sandwich cores10.1016/j.matdes.2012.06.033 ↗
99. Xiong J, Ma L, Vaziri A, Yang J, Wu L. Mechanical behavior of carbon fiber composite lattice core sandwich panels fabricated by laser cutting. vol. 60, pp. 5322–5334, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.06.004.10.1016/j.actamat.2012.06.004 ↗
100. Sun Y, Guo L, Wang T, Yao L, Sun X. Bending strength and failure of single-layer and double-layer sandwich structure with graded truss core. Compos Struct 2019; 226(March), p. 111204, doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111204.10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111204 ↗