Mechanical performance of 3D printed interpenetrating phase composites with spinodal topologies
Source abstract
Abstract
The mechanical response of interpenetrating phase composites (IPCs) with stochastic spinodal topologies is investigated experimentally and numerically. Model polymeric systems are fabricated by Polyjet multi-material printing, with the reinforcing phase taking the topology of a spinodal shell, and the remaining volume filled by a softer matrix. We show that spinodal shell IPCs have comparable compressive strength and stiffness to IPCs with two well-established periodic reinforcements, the Schwarz P triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) and the octet truss-lattice, while exhibiting far less catastrophic failure and greater damage resistance, particularly at high volume fraction of reinforcing phase. The combination of high stiffness and strength and a long flat plateau after yielding makes spinodal shell IPCs a promising candidate for energy absorption and impact protection applications, where the lack of material softening upon large compressive strains can prevent sudden collapse. Importantly, in contrast with all IPCs with periodic reinforcements, spinodal shell IPCs are amenable to scalable manufacturing via self-assembly techniques.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. Interpenetrating phase composites10.1111/j.1151-2916.1992.tb04138.x ↗
2. The mechanical behaviour of interpenetrating phase composites – I: modelling10.1016/S0020-7403(99)00025-9 ↗
3. Processing, compression response and finite element modeling of syntactic foam based interpenetrating phase composite (IPC)10.1016/j.msea.2008.09.042 ↗
4. Micromechanical finite element predictions of a reduced coefficient of thermal expansion for 3D periodic architectured interpenetrating phase composites10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.06.082 ↗
5. Periodic bicontinuous composites for high specific energy absorption10.1021/nl302234f ↗
6. Numerical prediction of elasto-plastic behaviour of interpenetrating phase composites by EFGM10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.03.022 ↗
7. Periodic co-continuous acoustic metamaterials with overlapping locally resonant and Bragg band gaps10.1063/1.4902129 ↗
8. Simulation of damage and failure processes of interpenetrating SiC/Al composites subjected to dynamic compressive loading10.1016/j.actamat.2014.06.045 ↗
9. Comparison of the elastic and plastic behaviours of two interpenetrating phase composites with HCP inspired morphologies10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105891 ↗
10. Enhancement of toughness of SiC through compositing SiC–Al interpenetrating phase composites10.1088/1361-6528/ab6468 ↗
11. Effect of reinforcement connectivity on the elasto-plastic behavior of aluminum composites containing sub-micron alumina particles10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00431-2 ↗
12. Preparation, microstructure and deformation behavior of Zr-based metallic glass/porous SiC interpenetrating phase composites10.1016/j.msea.2011.08.063 ↗
13. A novel approach to fabricate ceramic/metal interpenetrating phase composites by ultrasonic-assisted spontaneous infiltration10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.09.121 ↗
14. Anomalously low modulus of the interpenetrating-phase composite of Fe and Mg obtained by liquid metal dealloying10.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.01.017 ↗
15. Mechanical behavior of aluminum foam/polyurethane interpenetrating phase composites under monotonic and cyclic compression10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.10.026 ↗
16. Synthesis and mechanical properties of TiC-Fe interpenetrating phase composites fabricated by infiltration process10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.08.268 ↗
17. Cyclic compression behavior and energy dissipation of aluminum foam–polyurethane interpenetrating phase composites10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.07.016 ↗
18. Dealloying-based metal-polymer composites for biomedical applications10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.12.022 ↗
19. Fracture in metal–ceramic composites10.1016/j.compscitech.2003.09.026 ↗
20. Interfacial structure and stability of a co-continuous SiC/Al composite prepared by vacuum-pressure infiltration10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.02.085 ↗
21. 3D-printing of lightweight cellular composites10.1002/adma.201401804 ↗
22. 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034 ↗
23. 3D printing of highly stretchable and tough hydrogels into complex, cellularized structures10.1002/adma.201501099 ↗
24. 3D printing of photocurable cellulose nanocrystal composite for fabrication of complex architectures via stereolithography10.1021/acsami.7b09223 ↗
25. 3D printed Mg-NiTi interpenetrating-phase composites with high strength, damping capacity, and energy absorption efficiency10.1126/sciadv.aba5581 ↗
26. Infinite periodic minimal surfaces without self-intersect
27. Schwarz meets Schwann: Design and fabrication of biomorphic and durataxic tissue engineering scaffolds10.1016/j.media.2006.06.001 ↗
28. Mechanical performance of additively-manufactured anisotropic and isotropic smooth shell-lattice materials: Simulations & experiments10.1016/j.jmps.2018.08.022 ↗
29. Co-continuous composite materials for stiffness, strength, and energy dissipation10.1002/adma.201003956 ↗
30. Mechanical properties of 3D printed interpenetrating phase composites with novel architectured 3D solid-sheet reinforcements10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.02.009 ↗
31. Mechanical Properties of a New Type of Architected Interpenetrating Phase Composite Materials10.1002/admt.201600235 ↗
32. Mechanical properties of periodic interpenetrating phase composites with novel architected microstructures10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.026 ↗
33. Finite element prediction of effective elastic properties of interpenetrating phase composites with architectured 3D sheet reinforcements10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.01.011 ↗
34. 3D-printed multimaterial composites tailored for compliancy and strain recovery10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.049 ↗
35. Minimal surfaces and multifunctionality10.1098/rspa.2003.1269 ↗
36. Multifunctional composites: Optimizing microstructures for simultaneous transport of heat and electricity10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.266601 ↗
37. Free Energy of a Nonuniform System. I. Interfacial Free Energy10.1063/1.1744102 ↗
38. Microstructural evolution in nanoporous gold by thermal and acid treatments10.1016/j.matlet.2007.05.086 ↗
39. Colloidal jamming at interfaces: A route to fluid-bicontinuous gels10.1126/science.1116589 ↗
40. Bicontinuous macroporous materials from bijel templates10.1002/adma.201001696 ↗
41. Nanoporous Gold: Fabrication, Characterization, and Applications10.3390/ma2042188 ↗
42. Extraordinary high strength Ti-Zr-Ta alloys through nanoscaled, dual-cubic spinodal reinforcement10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.085 ↗
43. Improvements in spinodal alloys from past to present10.1016/j.matdes.2012.05.039 ↗
44. Scalable synthesis of gyroid-inspired freestanding three-dimensional graphene architectures10.1039/C9NA00358D ↗
45. Extreme mechanical resilience of self-assembled nanolabyrinthine materials10.1073/pnas.1916817117 ↗
46. The mechanical response of cellular materials with spinodal topologies10.1016/j.jmps.2019.01.002 ↗
47. A new type of low density material: Shellular10.1002/adma.201501546 ↗
48. A Microscopic Shell Structure with Schwarz’s D -Surface
49. Effective properties of the octet-truss lattice material10.1016/S0022-5096(01)00010-2 ↗
50. Mechanism-based multi-surface plasticity model for ideal truss lattice materials10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.10.032 ↗
51. The fracture toughness of octet-truss lattices10.1016/j.jmps.2016.09.009 ↗
52. Minimal surface designs for porous materials: from microstructures to mechanical properties10.1007/s10853-018-2285-5 ↗
53. Minisurf – A minimal surface generator for finite element modeling and additive manufacturing10.1016/j.simpa.2020.100035 ↗
54. Update (2.0) to MiniSurf—A minimal surface generator for finite element modeling and additive manufacturing
55. D20 Committee, “Test Method for Compressive Properties of Rigid Plastics,” ASTM International. 10.1520/D0695-15.
56. 3D-printed polymers exhibit a strength size effect
57. Micro-architectured materials: past, present and future
58. Gibson · 1999
59. The use of quasi-static testing to obtain the low-velocity impact damage resistance of marine GRP laminates10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.01.002 ↗
60. Concepts for enhanced energy absorption using hollow micro-lattices10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.03.007 ↗
61. Ultrahigh energy absorption multifunctional spinodal nanoarchitectures10.1002/smll.201903834 ↗
62. Plate-nanolattices at the theoretical limit of stiffness and strength10.1038/s41467-020-15434-2 ↗
63. Additive manufacturing of ductile, ultrastrong polymer-derived nanoceramics10.1016/j.matt.2019.09.009 ↗
64. Experimental investigation of mechanical properties of UV-Curable 3D printing materials10.1016/j.polymer.2018.04.067 ↗