Stochastic prediction of burst pressure in composite pressure vessels
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The main objective of this research is to predict burst pressure of composite pressure vessels subjected to internal pressure taking into account manufacturing uncertainties. Firstly, first-ply-failure (FPF) of composite pressure vessels with/without liner is studied comparing performance of different failure criteria. Then, burst pressure of the vessels are deterministically predicted using progressive damage modeling based on continuum damage mechanics approach. Both theoretical modeling approaches on predicting FPF and burst pressure are validated using available experimental data. Finally, stochastic modeling is conducted to estimate burst pressure of composite pressure vessels taking into account fiber volume fraction, winding angle and mechanical and strength properties as random parameters resembling manufacturing-induced inconsistencies. Statistical data analysis shows the importance of taking into consideration manufacturing variability.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Fatigue and fracture mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. http://www.compositesworld.com/articles/next-generation-pressure-vessels.
2. An estimation of strength for composite pressure vessels10.1016/0263-8223(92)90005-W ↗
3. The effect of fiber volume fraction on filament wound composite pressure vessel strength10.1016/S1359-8368(01)00009-9 ↗
4. Influence of filament wound parameters on composite vessel quality and strength10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00073-0 ↗
5. Probabilistic deformation and strength prediction for a filament wound pressure vessel10.1016/S1359-8368(03)00021-0 ↗
6. Size effect on the fiber strength of composite pressure vessels10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00250-7 ↗
7. Bursting problem of filament wound composite pressure vessels10.1016/S0308-0161(98)00096-9 ↗
8. Burst failure load of composite pressure vessels10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.06.021 ↗
9. Elasto-plastic stress analysis and burst strength evaluation of Al-carbon fiber/epoxy composite cylindrical laminates10.1016/j.commatsci.2007.09.011 ↗
10. Progressive failure analysis of carbon fiber/epoxy composite laminates using continuum damage mechanics10.1016/j.msea.2008.02.023 ↗
11. Finite element analysis of burst pressure of composite hydrogen storage vessels10.1016/j.matdes.2009.03.006 ↗
12. Continuum damage modeling and progressive failure analysis of carbon fiber/epoxy composite pressure vessel10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.107 ↗
13. A progressive failure analysis of a 700-bar type IV hydrogen composite pressure vessel10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.05.061 ↗
14. A fixed directions damage model for composite materials dedicated to hyperbaric type IV hydrogen storage vessel - part I10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.08.071 ↗
15. A fixed directions damage model for composite materials dedicated to hyperbaric type IV hydrogen storage vessel – part II10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.06.014 ↗
16. 700bar type IV high pressure hydrogen storage vessel burst – simulation and experimental validation10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.05.126 ↗
17. A probabilistic damage behavior law for composite material dedicated to composite pressure vessel10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.04.043 ↗
18. Numerical study of influence of temperature and matrix cracking on type IV hydrogen high pressure storage vessel behavior10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.12.034 ↗
19. Immersed particle method for fluid-structure interaction10.1002/nme.2670 ↗
20. A meshfree thin shell method for non-linear dynamic fracture10.1002/nme.2013 ↗
21. A simple and robust three-dimensional cracking method without enrichment10.1016/j.cma.2010.03.031 ↗
22. A three-dimensional large deformation meshfree method for arbitrary evolving cracks10.1016/j.cma.2006.06.020 ↗
23. Numerical simulation and optimal design for composite high-pressure hydrogen storage vessel: a review10.1016/j.rser.2012.01.006 ↗
24. Abaqus Analysis User’s Manual, Version 6.14-1.
25. Tsai · 1980
26. A fatigue criterion for fiber-reinforced materials10.1177/002199837300700404 ↗
27. Camanho P, Failure Criteria For Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composite; 2002.
28. Sun CT, Quinn BJ, Tao J, Oplinger DW., Comparative Evaluation of Failure Analysis Methods for Composite Laminates, NASA, DOT/FAA/AR-95/109; 1996.
29. First ply failure strength of laminated composite pressure vessels10.1016/S0263-8223(97)00042-1 ↗
30. Failure pressures of composite cylinders with a plastic liner10.1177/0731684411412225 ↗
31. Strengthening and design of the linear hardening thick-walled cylinders using the new method of rotational autofrettage
32. Effective plastic properties of laminates made of isotropic elastic plastic materials10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.04.029 ↗
33. Mechanik der plastischen formänderung von kristallen10.1002/zamm.19280080302 ↗
34. Committee on Durability and National Research Council Life Prediction of Polymer Matrix Composites in Extreme Environments, Going to Extremes: Meeting the Emerging Demand for Durable Polymer Matrix Composites, National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.; 2005.
35. David W. Progressive Failure Analysis Methodology for Laminated Composite Structure, Langley Research Center, NASA; 1999.
36. A damage evolution study of E-glass/epoxy composite under low velocity impact10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.02.016 ↗
37. Progressive damage modeling in fiber-reinforced materials10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.017 ↗
38. Camanho PP, Da’vila CG. Mixed-mode decohesion finite elements for the simulation of delamination in composite materials. NASA/TM-2002–211737; 2002. p. 1–37.
39. Determination of material parameters for Abaqus progressive damage analysis of E-glass epoxy laminates10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.069 ↗
40. Kleiber · 1992
41. Gibson · 2007