A multi-scale approach for the optimum design of sandwich plates with honeycomb core. Part I: homogenisation of core properties
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This work deals with the problem of the optimum design of a sandwich panel. The design process is based on a general two-level optimisation strategy involving different scales: the meso-scale for both the unit cell of the core and the constitutive layer of the laminated skins and the macro-scale for the whole panel. Concerning the meso-scale of the honeycomb core, an appropriate model of the unit cell able to properly provide its effective elastic properties (to be used at the macro-scale) must be conceived. To this purpose, in this first paper, we present the numerical homogenisation technique as well as the related finite element model of the unit cell which makes use of solid elements instead of the usual shell ones. A numerical study to determine the effective properties of the honeycomb along with a comparison with existing models and a sensitive analysis in terms of the geometric parameters of the unit cell have been conducted. Numerical results show that shell-based models are no longer adapted to evaluate the core properties, mostly in the context of an optimisation procedure where the parameters of the unit cell can get values that go beyond the limits imposed by a 2D model.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Material Properties and Processing · Topology Optimization in Engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Gibson · 1997
2. Vinson · 1999
3. Vautrin · 2010
4. Plane anisotropy by the polar method10.1007/s11012-005-2132-z ↗
5. Verchery G. Les invariants des tenseurs d’ordre 4 du type de l’élasticité. In: Proc. of colloque Euromech, VIllard-de-Lans, (France), vol. 115; 1979.
6. A two-level procedure for the global optimum design of composite modular structures – application to the design of an aircraft wing. Part 1: theoretical formulation10.1007/s10957-012-0067-9 ↗
7. A two-level procedure for the global optimum design of composite modular structures – application to the design of an aircraft wing. Part 2: numerical aspects and examples10.1007/s10957-012-0070-1 ↗
8. The out-of-plane properties of honeycombs
9. Mechanical behaviour of cellular core for structural sandwich panels10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00182-1 ↗
10. Assessment of continuum models for sandwich panel honeycomb cores10.1016/S0045-7825(96)01196-6 ↗
11. Homogenized elastic properties of honeycomb sandwich with skin effect10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00111-7 ↗
12. Determination of honeycomb material properties: existing theories and an alternative dynamic approach10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2006)19:3(177) ↗
13. A finite element study of the transverse shear in honeycomb cores10.1016/0020-7683(93)90233-W ↗
14. Equivalent transverse shear stiffness of honeycomb cores10.1016/0020-7683(94)00202-8 ↗
15. Effective elastic properties of foam-filled honeycomb cores of sandwich panels10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.04.015 ↗
16. Effective properties for sandwich plates with aluminium foil honeycomb core and polymer foam filling – static and dynamic response10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.04.014 ↗
17. Mechanical properties of nomex material and nomex honeycomb structure10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.07.010 ↗
18. Experimental studies on mechanical properties of cellular structures using nomex honeycomb cores10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.01.024 ↗
19. ASTM. West Conshohocken, Pa, C273 standard method of shear test in flatwise plane of flat sandwich constructions or sandwich cores; 1970.
20. ASTM. West Conshohocken, Pa, C271 standard test method for density of core materials for structural sandwich constructions; 1988.
21. ASTM. West Conshohocken, Pa, C365 standard test methods for flatwise compressive strength of sandwich cores; 1988.
22. ASTM. West Conshohocken, Pa, D6790 standard test method for determining Poisson’s ratio of honeycomb cores; 2002.
23. Barbero · 2008
24. ANSYS, Inc. 275 technology drive, Canonsburg, PA 15317, ANSYS mechanical APDL modeling and meshing guide; 2012.
25. Jones · 1975
26. Modelling of composite sandwich structures with honeycomb core subjected to high-velocity impact10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.10.013 ↗
27. Finite element modelling of low velocity impact of composite sandwich panels10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00084-7 ↗
28. Lamb waves for the non-destructive inspection of monolithic and sandwich composite beams10.1016/S1359-835X(04)00162-9 ↗
29. Hypervelocity impact on carbon fibre reinforced plastic/aluminium honeycomb: comparison with whipple bumper shields10.1016/S0734-743X(99)00132-3 ↗
30. HexWeb honeycomb attributes and properties. Duxford, Cambridge, UK; 1999.