journal article·2017-09

On crushing characteristics of different configurations of metal-composites hybrid tubes

Guohua Zhu, Guangyong Sun, Qiang Liu, Guangyao Li, Qing Li

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Metal/composites hybrid structures, which combine low-density composites with low-cost metallic materials, are gaining increasing attention for meeting higher and higher requirements of lightweighting and crashworthiness in automotive and aerospace engineering. This study explores the crushing characteristics involving energy absorption and damage behaviors of three different configurations of hybrid aluminum/CFRP under quasi-static axial loading. For a comparative purpose, empty aluminum tube and CFRP tube were tested as well. Based on the experimental results, effects of different configurations on crashworthiness characteristics were studied; and it was found that the hybrid tube H-I (i.e. the aluminum tube internally filled with a CFRP tube) offers the best results. Finally, the advantages of hybrid tube H-I were further investigated from the perspectives of cost and lightweight by using the analytical models derived. It was found that for the same energy absorption, hybrid tube H-I saves the cost by 32.1% compared with the pure CFRP tube, and leads to the weight saving of 33.6% compared with the pure aluminum tube. Such a hybrid structure would be of considerable potential to be used as an efficient energy absorber.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Transportation Safety and Impact Analysis · Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. An approximate analysis of the collapse of thin cylindrical shells under axial loading10.1093/qjmam/13.1.10 ↗
2. On the crushing mechanics of thin-walled structures10.1115/1.3167137 ↗
3. Alexander revisited-a two folding elements model of progressive crushing of tubes10.1016/0020-7683(92)90040-Z ↗
4. Axial crushing of multicorner sheet metal columns10.1115/1.3176030 ↗
5. Dynamic progressive buckling of circular and square tubes10.1016/0734-743X(86)90017-5 ↗
6. On the crumpling of thin tubular struts10.1093/qjmam/32.1.1 ↗
7. Further experimental investigation on the eccentricity factor in the progressive crushing of tubes10.1016/0020-7683(95)00195-6 ↗
8. Thin-walled structures as impact energy absorbers10.1016/S0263-8231(02)00082-4 ↗
9. Recent development in aluminium alloys for the automotive industry10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00653-X ↗
10. Impact energy dissipation characteristics of thin-walled cylinders10.1016/0263-8231(93)90020-B ↗
11. Lightweight design and crash analysis of composite frontal impact energy absorbing structures10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.08.005 ↗
12. Multi-objective optimization of aluminum hollow tubes for vehicle crash energy absorption using a genetic algorithm and neural networks10.1016/j.tws.2011.08.009 ↗
13. Static and dynamic axial crushing of square thin-walled aluminium extrusions10.1016/S0734-743X(96)00025-5 ↗
14. Experimental investigations on the behaviour of short to long square aluminium tubes subjected to axial loading10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.05.002 ↗
15. On the response of thin-walled CFRP composite tubular components subjected to static and dynamic axial compressive loading: experimental10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.07.021 ↗
16. Quasi-static axial crushing and transverse bending of double hat shaped CFRP tubes10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.06.024 ↗
17. Experimental investigation on mean crushing stress characterization of carbon–epoxy plies under compressive crushing mode10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.022 ↗
18. Crush energy absorption of composite channel section specimens10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.05.021 ↗
19. Characteristics of aluminum/CFRP short square hollow section beam under transverse quasi-static loading10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.03.020 ↗
20. State-of-the-art review on FRP strengthened steel structures10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.10.006 ↗
21. Static and dynamic axial crushing analysis of car frontal impact hybrid absorbers10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.06.011 ↗
22. A multi-objective surrogate-based optimization of the crashworthiness of a hybrid impact absorber10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.07.002 ↗
23. Watanabe · 1991 · 285
24. Effect of length on crashworthiness parameters and failure modes of steel and hybrid tube made by steel and GFRP under low velocity impact10.1080/13588265.2012.661238 ↗
25. A numerical study on the quasi-static axial crush characteristics of square aluminum–composite hybrid tubes10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.03.004 ↗
26. Axial capacity and design of thin-walled steel SHS strengthened with CFRP10.1016/j.tws.2008.10.006 ↗
27. Crashworthiness of aluminum/CFRP square hollow section beam under axial impact loading for crash box application10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.01.042 ↗
28. Crashworthy capability of composite material structures10.1016/S0263-8223(97)80005-0 ↗
29. A unified approach to progressive crushing of fibre-reinforced composite tubes10.1016/0266-3538(91)90031-J ↗
30. Crushing characteristics of continuous fiber-reinforced composite tubes10.1177/002199839202600103 ↗
31. Theoretical analysis on the collapse mechanisms of thin-walled composite tubes10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.03.020 ↗
32. Experimental study on crashworthiness of empty/aluminum foam/honeycomb–filled CFRP tubes10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.06.019 ↗
33. Crush responses of composite cylinder under quasi-static and dynamic loading10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.04.057 ↗
34. On design optimization for structural crashworthiness and its state of the art10.1007/s00158-016-1579-y ↗
35. Parameterization of criss-cross configurations for multiobjective crashworthiness optimization10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.02.027 ↗