Thermoplastic sandwich structure design and manufacturing for the body panel of mass transit vehicle
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Weight savings in vehicles enhances fuel efficiency and decreases maintenance costs, especially in mass transit systems. Lightweight composite materials, such as glass fiber reinforced polymers, have been used to replace traditional steel and aluminum components. In this paper, a mass transit bus side body panel was designed, analyzed, and manufactured using thermoplastic composite materials. The design featured a sandwich composite with E-glass fiber/polypropylene (glass/PP) face sheets and PP honeycomb core as constituents that provide low weight, high strength and energy absorption benefits. The panel was designed and analyzed using Pro/Engineer 2001 (Pro/E), Altair ® Hypermesh ® 6.0 (Hypermesh) and ANSYS 7.0 (ANSYS). A single diaphragm forming process was used to manufacture the glass/PP face sheets. This process provides excellent consolidation, which was confirmed by microstructural analysis of the face sheets. The face sheets and core material were adhesively bonded and tested to validate the model. The failure of the body panel occurred by adhesive failure when the load reached 11.7 kN. The static loading requirements of the American Public Transportation Association (APTA) for the body panel were met. The thermoplastic composite body panel exhibited excellent weight saving of more than 55% compared to a conventional bus with aluminum skin and supporting steel bars.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. US composites industry expands despite economy10.1016/S0034-3617(02)80211-9 ↗
2. Bright future for GRP industry in India10.1016/S0034-3617(98)80015-5 ↗
3. Composite bumpers10.1016/S0034-3617(01)80109-0 ↗
4. A multilevel approach to the optimization of a composite light rail vehicle bodyshell10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00193-4 ↗
5. Hardcore-dupont rolls out its first composite railcar10.1016/S0034-3617(98)80114-8 ↗
6. www.nabiusa.com [accessed 02/20/2005].
7. Failure analysis of FRP sandwich bus panels by finite element method10.1016/S1359-8368(02)00069-0 ↗
8. Design and manufacture of woven reinforced glass/polypropylene composites for mass transit floor structure10.1177/0021998304048418 ↗
9. Novel stitch-bonded sandwich composite structure10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00087-9 ↗
10. Vehicle chassis of sandwich construction
11. Zenkert · 1995
12. www.nida-core.com [accessed 02/20/2005].
13. Thermoplastic composite technology; tougher than you think10.1002/1521-4095(200012)12:23<1865::AID-ADMA1865>3.0.CO;2-N ↗
14. The consolidation of commingled thermoplastic fabrics10.1002/pc.750120607 ↗
15. Price RV. Production of impregnated rovings, US Patent # 03742106; 1973.
16. Processing of thermoplastic composites from powder/sheath-fibre bundles10.1016/0924-0136(94)01664-M ↗
17. The characterization of low cost fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites produced by the DRIFT process10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00061-6 ↗
18. Thermoplastic filament winding with online-impregnation part B. Experimental study of processing parameters.10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00136-7 ↗
19. Goguelin M. Reinforced thermoplastics sheet and its manufacturing process, US Patent # 05008306; 1991.
20. Fatigue mechanisms in unidirectional glass-fibre-reinforced polypropylene10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00119-5 ↗
21. Effects of processing conditions on the impregnation of glass fibre mat in extrusion/calendaring and film stacking operations10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00175-1 ↗
22. A direct comparison of matched-die versus diaphragm forming10.1016/S1359-835X(97)82706-6 ↗
23. Production of textile reinforced thermoplastics profiles by roll forming10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.12.001 ↗
24. Roll forming continuous fibre-reinforced thermoplastic sheets: experimental analysis10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00076-2 ↗
25. Roll forming of sheet materials
26. Axisymmetric sheet forming of knitted fabric composite by combined stretch forming and deep drawing10.1016/S1359-8368(99)00015-3 ↗
27. Effect of forming temperature on the properties of polymeric diaphragm formed thermoplastic composites10.1016/0266-3538(89)90037-7 ↗
28. Development of the double RIFT diaphragm forming process10.1177/0731684402021018482 ↗
29. Optimization of the diaphragm forming process with regard to product quality and cost10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00147-6 ↗
30. Using reconfigurable tooling and surface heating for incremental forming of composite aircraft parts10.1115/1.1561456 ↗
31. Olsen SH. Single diaphragm forming of drapeable thermoplastic impregnated composite materials, US Patent #5037599; 1991.
32. American Public Transportation Association Guidelines, 1666K Street NW, Washington, DC; 2006. Available from: www.apta.com.
33. Crushing of hybrid square sandwich composite vehicle hollow bodyshells with reinforced core subjected to axial loading: numerical simulation10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00069-2 ↗
34. Ning H, Vaiyda KU, Janowski GM, Husman G. Design, manufacturing and analysis of thermoplastic composite frame structure with open cross-section for mass transit. Compos Struct, accepted for publication.
35. Husman G, Vaidya UK, Janowski GM, Serrano JC. FTA report FTA-AL-26-7001-2004.1, July 2004.
36. Composites on the road to the big time10.1016/S0034-3617(03)80054-1 ↗
37. Structural bonding of composites in the transportation market10.1016/S0034-3617(99)80048-4 ↗