A review of alternative materials for replacing existing timber sleepers
Source abstract
Abstract
Timber is the most widely used material for railway sleepers, however, as a sleeper material it deteriorates with time and needs appropriate replacement. In recent years, hardwood timber for railway sleepers is becoming more expensive, less available and is of inferior quality compared to the timber previously available. There are also now various environmental concerns regarding the use and disposal of chemically-impregnated timber sleepers. This has resulted in most railway industries searching for alternative materials to replace existing timber sleepers. This paper presents a review of recent developments and presents an initiative focusing on fibre composites as an alternative material for railway sleepers. Fibre composites are emerging as an alternative viable construction material. An overview of the on-going research and development on innovative fibre composite railway sleepers is also discussed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Railway Engineering and Dynamics · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Cellular and Composite Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. Ellis DC. Track terminology. In: British railway track. England: The Permanent Way, Institution, 2001.
2. Reliability analysis and maintenance decision for railway sleepers using track condition information10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602251 ↗
3. Ets Rothlisberger. History and development of wooden sleeper. [viewed 20.10.08].
4. Miller R. Rail and tramway sleepers: product recognition, identification and presentation. [viewed 29.05.08].
5. Van Erp G, Cattell C, Huang D. Fibre composite innovations in Australia’s construction industry. CRC for construction innovation, Australia; 2006.
6. Lampo R. Recycled plastic composite railroad crossties. [viewed 06.11.08].
7. Woidasky J. Railwaste – production of railway sleepers by mixed plastic waste. SUSPRISE joint call evaluation workshop. Berlin, Germany; 2008.
8. Prediction of the demand of the railway sleepers: a simulation model for the replacement strategies10.1016/S0925-5273(02)00299-2 ↗
9. Hagaman BR, McAlphine RJ. ROA timber sleeper development project. In: Proceedings of the eight international rail track conference, Rail Track Association of Australia; 1991. p. 233–7.
10. Optimat Ltd & MERL Ltd. Wood plastic composites study – technologies and UK market opportunities. The Waste and Resource Action Programme, United Kingdom; 2003.
11. Modelling of rail track performance: an integrated approach10.1680/tran.2000.141.4.187 ↗
12. Baggott · 2006
13. Adams JCB. Cost effective strategy for track stability and extended asset life through planned sleeper retention. In: Demand management of assets national conference publication, Australia: Institution of Engineers; 1991. p. 145–152.
14. Hearsch J. Rail CRC research helps save old-growth forests. [viewed 27.11.08].
15. Stevens N, Dux P. Case study: design of new prestressed concrete railway sleepers. [viewed 28.11.08].
16. BHP Institute of Railway Industry – Monash University. Advancing the railway industry through technology. [viewed 02.10.08].
17. Modelling and optimal design of composite-reinforced wood railroad crosstie10.1016/S0263-8223(98)00051-8 ↗
18. Humpreys · 2004
19. On the reinforcement of concrete sleepers by composite materials10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.05.005 ↗
20. Ticoalu ANE. Investigation on fibre composite turnout sleepers. Master of engineering dissertation, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia; 2008.
21. The mechanism of railway tracks
22. Hoger DI. Fibre composite railway sleepers. University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia; 2000.
23. Anonymous. SEKISUI FFU synthetic railway sleepers. [viewed 08.08.08].
24. Jordan R. Testing plastic railway sleepers. Testing Research Laboratory, United Kingdom. [viewed 03.08.08].
25. Zarembski AM. Concrete vs. wood ties: making the economic choice. Conference on maintaining railway track: determining cost and allocating resources, Arlington, VA; 1993.
26. Hibbeler · 2004
27. Pruszinski A. Review of the landfill disposal risks and the potential for recovery and recycling of preservative treated timber. Environmental Protection Agency Report. South Australia; 1999.
28. European Rail Infrastructure Managers (EIM) Newsletter. A ban on the use of creosote: possible consequences for the railway sector. Brussels, Belgium; June 2008.
29. The creosote content of used railway crossties as compared with European stipulations for hazardous waste10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.04.035 ↗
30. Morris T. Poisonous railway sleepers pose health risk. The Greens Tasmania. Media release, October 2008.
31. New South Wales Environment Protection Agency Assessment, Classification and management of liquid and non-liquid wastes; 1999.
32. An industry evaluation of the reuse, recycling and reduction of spent CCA wood products
33. Norton J. Safety and the use of CCA-treated timber. Queensland Department of Primary Industries. Timber Research and Development Advisory Council, Timber Note 13; 1998.
34. AREMA 2003. Basic track components. [viewed 22.05.08].
35. Kohoutek R. Dynamic and static performance of interspersed railway track. Railway engineering conference, Adelaide, Australia; 1991.
36. Cope DL, Ellis JB. Plain line maintenance. British railway track. England: The permanent way, institution, 2001.
37. Railway track and structures January 2008. [viewed 02.06.08].
38. European Federation of Railway Trackworks Contractors. High-output installation of Y-steel-sleepers. [viewed 11.11.08].
39. Mitchell R, Baggott MG, Birks J. Steel sleepers – an engineering approach to improved productivity. In: Conference on railway engineering, Perth, Australia; 1987.
40. Making supply equal demand
41. Look for wood in crossties
42. Failure analysis of concrete sleepers in heavy haul railway tracks10.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.11.021 ↗
43. Health and Safety Executive 2007. Rail track and associated equipment for use underground in mines: guidance on selection, installation and maintenance. [viewed 02.09.08].
44. AGO Factors and Methods Workbook. Australian Greenhouse Office, Department of the Environment and Heritage; December 2006.
45. Pattamaprom · 2005
46. Indian composites industry set to take off10.1016/S0034-3617(04)00231-0 ↗
47. Cromberge P. Polymer rail sleepers being tested for the mining industry. [viewed 04.11.08].
48. Transportation Technology Center. Fiberglass wrapped tie performance evaluation report. Office and Research and Development, Federal Railroad Administration, US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC; 2005.
49. Prasad P. Fibre composite railway transom. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Fibre Composites in Civil Infrastructure – Past, present and future, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia; December 2008. p. 67–71.
50. Standards Australia. Timber structures – design methods. Australian Standard: AS 1720.1-1997; 1997.
51. Australian Rail Track Corporation Ltd. Engineering (Track and Civil) Standard, ETA-02-01 Timber sleeper, turnout and bridge transom specification.
52. Gangarao · 2007
53. Belouettar S, Abbadi A, Azari Z, Belouettar R, Freres P. Experimental investigation of static and fatigue behaviour of composite honeycomb materials using four point bending tests. Composite Structures, Elsevier; 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.01.015.10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.01.015 ↗
54. Van Erp G, Rogers D. A highly sustainable fibre composite building panel. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on fibre composites in civil infrastructure – past, present and future, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia; December 2008. p. 17–23.