journal article·2018-01

Experimental and numerical studies on indentation and perforation characteristics of honeycomb sandwich panels

Guangyong Sun, Dongdong Chen, Xintao Huo, Gang Zheng, Qing Li

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Aluminum sandwich panels with honeycomb core have been widely used as energy absorption structure in lightweight design. This study aimed to characterize the indentation and perforation behaviors of sandwich structures with different geometric configurations. The specimens with four characteristic geometric variables, namely, facesheet thickness, core height, honeycomb core thickness and side length of hexagon cell were tested experimentally. Photographs of cross-sectional view near the loading area and failure modes in the tests were investigated in detail. For the first time, digital image correlation (DIC) technique through an ARAMIS™ real-time optical strain measurement system was adopted for capturing the deformation process of lower skin by acquiring the displacement-time data. Three typical damage modes were identified from the force-displacement curves with different geometric parameters and configurations. It was found that the thickness of facesheet has the most significant effects on both force-displacement curves and energy absorption capacity. Changes in the core parameters have relatively small influences in total energy absorption but sizeable effects on the force-displacement curve and failure modes. A finite element model for predicting damage evolution was also developed and validated through the force-displacement relation and deformation process on the bottom skin. The damage mechanisms of the sandwich panel subject to quasi-static indentation and perforation were analyzed through the numerical models. The present study contributed on understanding how the geometric parameters affect the characteristics of indentation and perforation, thereby providing useful guidelines for its potential applications in impact engineering.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. Quasi-static indentation tests on aluminium foam sandwich panels10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.11.014 ↗
2. Dynamic behavior of aluminum honeycomb sandwich panels under air blast: Experiment and numerical analysis10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.10.034 ↗
3. Lu · 2003
4. Impact behavior and energy absorption of paper honeycomb sandwich panels10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.03.002 ↗
5. Study on the low-velocity impact response and CAI behavior of foam-filled sandwich panels with hybrid facesheet10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.058 ↗
6. Experimental and numerical research on the low velocity impact behavior of hybrid corrugated core sandwich structures10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.09.009 ↗
7. Experimental and numerical analysis of critical buckling load of honeycomb sandwich panels10.1177/0021998310371541 ↗
8. Gibson · 1999
9. Triantafillou · 1987
10. Failure mode maps for foam core sandwich beams10.1016/0025-5416(87)90496-4 ↗
11. Effect of face sheet material on the indentation response of metallic foams10.1007/s10853-006-0373-4 ↗
12. Impact perforation of sandwich panels with aluminum foam core: A numerical and analytical study10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.05.013 ↗
13. Dynamic response of slender multilayer sandwich beams with metal foam cores subjected to low-velocity impact10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.06.059 ↗
14. Response of aluminium honeycomb sandwich panels subjected to foam projectile impact – An experimental study10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.07.019 ↗
15. Crashworthiness optimization design of honeycomb sandwich panel based on factor screening10.1177/1099636212445057 ↗
16. Experimental and numerical study on honeycomb sandwich panels under bending and in-panel compression10.1016/j.matdes.2017.07.057 ↗
17. Damage and failure mode maps of composite sandwich panel subjected to quasi-static indentation and low velocity impact10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.02.010 ↗
18. Numerical assessment of the impact behavior of honeycomb sandwich structures10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.06.010 ↗
19. Compression after impact test (CAI) on NOMEX™ honeycomb sandwich panels with thin aluminum skins10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.07.015 ↗
20. Numerical modelling of Nomex honeycomb sandwich cores at meso-scale level10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.09.071 ↗
21. Experimental and numerical study on the mechanical response of Nomex honeycomb core under transverse loading10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.034 ↗
22. Virtual testing of sandwich core structures using dynamic finite element simulations10.1016/j.commatsci.2008.09.017 ↗
23. Crashworthiness optimization of corrugated sandwich panels10.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.086 ↗
24. Experimental study on the dynamic response of foam-filled corrugated core sandwich panels subjected to air blast loading10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.08.038 ↗
25. The low velocity impact response of curvilinear-core sandwich structures10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.01.012 ↗
26. Experimental and numerical studies on multi-layered corrugated sandwich panels under crushing loading10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.02.039 ↗
27. Curved sandwich composites with layer-wise graded cores under impact loads10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.09.054 ↗
28. Failure mode investigation of sandwich beams with functionally graded core10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.08.030 ↗
29. Low-velocity impact response of sandwich beams with functionally graded core10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.003 ↗
30. The impact response of graded foam sandwich structures10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.10.037 ↗
31. Experimental study on the low velocity impact responses of all-composite pyramidal truss core sandwich panel after high temperature exposure10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.06.005 ↗
32. The effect of temperature on the bending properties and failure mechanism of composite truss core sandwich structures10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.09.017 ↗
33. Niewenhuis · 2003
34. Haber D. Lightweight materials for automotive applications: a review, SAE Technical Paper, 2015.10.4271/2015-36-0219 ↗
35. Gobessi M, Arnold W. The application of bonded aluminum sandwich construction technology to achieve a lightweight, low cost automotive structure, SAE Technical Paper, 1998.10.4271/982279 ↗
36. Indentation, penetration and perforation of composite laminate and sandwich panels under quasi-static and projectile loading
37. Quasi-static and low-velocity impact failure of aluminium honeycomb sandwich panels, proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers
38. The strength characteristics of aluminum honeycomb sandwich panels10.1016/S0263-8231(99)00026-9 ↗
39. Experimental and numerical investigation on indentation and energy absorption of a honeycomb sandwich panel under low-velocity impact10.1016/j.finel.2016.04.003 ↗
40. Low-velocity impact failure of aluminium honeycomb sandwich panels10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.10.016 ↗
41. Development of numerical realistic model for predicting low-velocity impact response of aluminium honeycomb sandwich structures10.1177/1099636215603047 ↗
42. A model to predict low-velocity impact response and damage in sandwich composites10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.12.007 ↗
43. Deformation and failure of blast-loaded metallic sandwich panels—Experimental investigations10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.11.003 ↗
44. A numerical simulation of the blast impact of square metallic sandwich panels10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.12.004 ↗
45. Impact behavior of honeycomb structures with various cell specifications—numerical simulation and experiment10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.09.001 ↗
46. Comparison of aluminium sandwiches for lightweight ship structures: Honeycomb vs. foam10.1016/j.marstruc.2012.11.002 ↗
47. Experimental Analysis and Modeling of the Crushing of Honeycomb Cores10.1007/s10443-005-1125-3 ↗
48. Axial crush of metallic honeycombs10.1016/S0734-743X(97)00004-3 ↗
49. Collapse modes in aluminium honeycomb sandwich panels under bending and impact loading10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.12.002 ↗
50. Investigation of parameters governing the damage and energy absorption characteristics of honeycomb sandwich panels10.1177/1099636207067134 ↗
51. Damage characteristics of composite honeycomb sandwich panels in bending under quasi-static loading10.1177/1099636206056888 ↗
52. Indentation failure behavior of honeycomb sandwich panels10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00023-3 ↗
53. Experimental and numerical investigations of low velocity impact on sandwich panels10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.11.031 ↗
54. A review of low-velocity impact on sandwich structures
55. Crashing analysis and multiobjective optimization for thin-walled structures with functionally graded thickness10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.10.004 ↗
56. Numerical investigations on the ballistic performance of honeycomb sandwich structures reinforced by functionally graded plates
57. A. Version, 6.13, Analysis User’s Manual, Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp., Providence, RI, 2013.
58. Parameterization of criss-cross configurations for multiobjective crashworthiness optimization10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.02.027 ↗
59. Multi-objective and multi-case reliability-based design optimization for tailor rolled blank (TRB) structures10.1007/s00158-016-1592-1 ↗
60. On design optimization for structural crashworthiness and its state of the art10.1007/s00158-016-1579-y ↗
61. On design of multi-cell thin-wall structures for crashworthiness10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.09.003 ↗