Composite railway sleepers – Recent developments, challenges and future prospects
Source abstract
Abstract
A number of composite railway sleeper technologies have been developed but their applications in rail tracks are still limited. This paper rigorously reviews the recent developments on composite sleepers and identifies the critical barriers to their widespread acceptance and applications. Currently the composite sleeper technologies that are available ranges from sleepers made with recycle plastic materials which contains short or no fibre to the sleepers that containing high volume of fibres. While recycled plastic sleepers are low cost, the major challenges of using this type of sleepers are their limited strength, stiffness and dynamic properties which in most cases, are incompatible with those of timber. On the other hand, the prohibitive cost of high fibre containing sleepers limit their widespread application. Moreover, limited knowledge on the historical long-term performance of these new and alternative materials restricts their application. Potential design approaches for overcoming the challenges in the utilisation and acceptance of composite sleeper technologies are also presented in this paper.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Railway Engineering and Dynamics · Railway Systems and Energy Efficiency · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (85)
Show source-provided references
1. Greenhouse gas emissions embodied in reinforced concrete and timber railway sleepers10.1021/es8023836 ↗
2. RailCorp engineering specification, SPC 232: concrete sleepers, Australia; 2012.
3. ARTC. Steel sleepers – usage and installation standards TCS 10 Engineering (Track) Australian Rail Track Corporation; 2009.
4. History and development of the wooden sleeper. CH-2855, Glovelier: Ets Rothlisberger SA.
5. Kaewunruen · 2010
6. A review of alternative materials for replacing existing timber sleepers10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.08.046 ↗
7. Failures of mainline railway sleepers and suggested remedies – review of current practice10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.04.020 ↗
8. Fibre composite structures in Australia’s civil engineering market: an anatomy of innovation10.1002/pse.199 ↗
9. GangaRao · 2007
10. Recent Australian developments in fibre composite railway sleepers10.56748/ejse.131611 ↗
11. Anne, Evans R. Rubber/plastic composite rail sleepers. UK: The waste & resources action programme; 2006.
12. TieTek. Increase productive track time and reduce costs with TieTek™ composite ties. [Access Date: 07.08.14].
13. Louie · 2013
14. Axion-EcoTrax. Axion EcoTrax composite railroad ties. [Access Date: 02.08.14].
15. Chow · 2007
16. IntegriCo. Integrico composites. [Access Date: 02.08.14].
17. Clifton P. Plastic surgery. Rail Professional; 2009. p. 26.10.1016/S1535-1513(08)79013-1 ↗
18. PRS. £100m deal to supply plastic railway sleepers. [Access Date: 13.08.14].
19. Cromberge P. Polymer rail sleepers being tested for the mining industry. Mining Weekly; 2005.
20. Tufflex. Plastic polymer & intrusion products, Tufflex Plastic Products Pty. Ltd. [Access Date: 12.08.14].
21. Pattamaprom C, Dechojarassri D, Sirisinha C, Kanok-Nukulchai W. Natural rubber composites for railway sleepers: a feasibility study; 2005.
22. Dechojarassri · 2005
23. KLP. KLP main track sleeper – Sustainable plastic railway solutions, Lankhorst Rail, Netherlands. [Access Date: 13.08.14].
24. Lankhorst. Kunststof railway production, Netherlands. [Access Date: 12.08.14].
25. Graebe G, Woidasky J, Fraunhofer JV. Railway sleepers from mixed plastic waste-Railwaste project status information. Fraunhofer ICT; 2010.
26. Wood-core. Plastic composite wood core railroad ties 270lbs near indestructible, Southwest RV and Marine, Texas, USA. [Access Date: 12.08.14].
27. Takai H, Sato Y, Sato K. Japanese twenty five years experiences and standardization of synthetic sleeper; 2006.
28. Kaewunruen S. Acoustic and dynamic characteristics of a complex urban turnout using fibre-reinforced foamed urethane (FFU) bearers. International Workshop on Railway Noise; 2013.
29. FFU. FFU synthetic railway sleepers, Sekisui Chemical GmbH, Japan. [Access Date: 11.08.14].
30. FFU synthetic sleeper – projects in Europe10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.118 ↗
31. Koller G. The use of sleepers made of FFU synthetic wood in Europe; 2009. p. 28–32.
32. Liu A-S, Yin D, Liu G. A study on application of resin composite sleeper in design of long-span rail bridges. Sustainable transportation systems; 2012. p. 523–31.10.1061/9780784412299.0063 ↗
33. Behaviour of full-scale railway turnout sleepers from glue-laminated fibre composite sandwich structures10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000307 ↗
34. Geopolymer concrete-filled pultruded composite beams – concrete mix design and application10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.12.012 ↗
35. Goldgaber A. Plastic railroad ties: growing market for alternative materials; 2009.
36. Rail – an evolving market for FRP components
37. Manalo A, Aravinthan T, Karunasena W, Douglas S. Fibre composite sandwich beam: An alternative to railway turnout sleeper?. In: Southern region engineering conference, Toowoomba, Australia; 2010.
38. Analysis of a typical railway turnout sleeper system using grillage beam analogy10.1016/j.finel.2011.08.007 ↗
39. Jeffs T, Tew GP. A review of track design procedures. BHP Research – Melbourne Laboratories; 1991.
40. Summary of current state of practice for composite crossties
41. Construction loads for plastic/composite ties
42. Chattree R, Manoharan S, Satyanarayana PVV. Composite sleepers for bridges: progress till date and road ahead. Pune, India: Indian Railway Institute of Civil Engineering.
43. Standard Australia, AS 1085.14: Railway track material-prestressed concrete sleeper, Australia; 2012.
44. Lampo · 2003
45. Manalo AC, Aravinthan T. Mechanical behaviour of a new type of fibre composite railway sleeper. In: Asia-Pacific conference on FRP in structures, Japan; 2012.
46. Subramanian PS. Induction of a new generation material for the railway infrastructure. In: National Technical Seminar of IPWE(I), Kolkata; 2004.
47. Cirko C. Plastic lumber possibilities. [Access Date: 10.08.14].
48. Nosker T, Renfree R, Lynch J, Lutz M, Gillespie B, Ness KEV, et al. A performance-based approach to the development of a recycled plastic/composite crosstie.
49. A review of loading conditions for railway track structures due to train and track vertical interaction10.1002/stc.227 ↗
50. Steffens · 2005
51. Dynamic crack propagations in prestressed concrete sleepers in railway track systems subjected to severe impact loads10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000152 ↗
52. Progressive failure of prestressed concrete sleepers under multiple high-intensity impact loads10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.06.002 ↗
53. Failure mechanisms on composite specimens subjected to compression after impact10.1016/S0263-8223(98)00081-6 ↗
54. Rosato · 2001
55. Fatigue in railway and tramway track
56. Fatigue damage modeling of fibre-reinforced composite materials: review10.1115/1.1381395 ↗
57. Fatigue mechanisms of thermoplastics10.1002/pen.760060414 ↗
58. FFU synthetic sleeper – railway technology Sekisui Chemical GmbH; 2010.
59. Composite crosstie test: cyclic load. USA: Sirius Roybal, Transportation Technology Center, Inc.; 2009.
60. Ridout · 2013
61. Effects of environmental exposure on fibre-reinforced plastic (FRP) materials used in construction10.1520/CTR10120J ↗
62. Effect of the environment on the durability of plastic-based materials
63. Shah · 2007
64. Andrady · 2003
65. Characterization of moisture absorption and its influence on composite structures10.1177/089270570001300303 ↗
66. Effect of moisture content and temperature on the mechanical properties of wood: an analysis of immediate effects
67. Effect of moisture condition on concrete core strengths
68. Benmokrane B, Rahman H. Durability of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites for constructions. In: Benmokrane B, Rahman H, editors. CDCC-98, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada; 1998.
69. Katsuki F, Uomoto T. Prediction of deterioration of FRP rods due to alkali attack. In: Nonmetallic (FRP) reinforcement for concrete structures, FRPCS-2, Gent, Belgium; 1995.
70. Effects of alkaline and acid solutions on glass/epoxy composites10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.12.029 ↗
71. Characterisation of mechanical and thermal properties of epoxy grouts for composite repair of steel pipelines10.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.068 ↗
72. Mechanical properties and failure behaviour of carbon fibre-reinforced polymer composites under the influence of moisture10.1016/S1359-835X(96)00154-6 ↗
73. Palyi · 1991
74. Lateral resistance of railway track with frictional sleepers
75. Performance and safety issues regarding the use of plastic composite crossties
76. Standard Australia, AS 3818.2: timber – heavy structural products – visually graded – railway track timbers, Australia; 2010.
77. RailCorp engineering specification, SPC 231: timber sleepers and bearers, Australia; 2012.
78. Standard Australia, AS 1085.17: railway track materials-Steel sleeper, Australia; 2003.
79. ARTC. ARTC Standard, ETA-02-03: steel sleeper specification; Australia; 2011.
80. Bank · 2006
81. A review of optimization techniques used in the design of fibre composite structures for civil engineering applications10.1016/j.matdes.2011.04.061 ↗
82. Effects of sleeper shape on lateral resistance of railway ballasted tracks
83. Application of alkali-activated slag concrete in railway sleepers10.1016/j.matdes.2014.12.051 ↗
84. Ultimate limit states design of concrete railway sleepers
85. Introducing a new limit states design concept to railway concrete sleepers: an Australian experience10.3389/fmats.2014.00008 ↗