Local bond-slip response of GFRP rebar in ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This study investigates the bond performance of steel and glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) rebars embedded in ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete (UHPFRC). The steel rebar showed 2.8–3.6 times higher bond strengths than the GFRP rebar and rebar yielding at embedment length of 2 times the rebar diameter. The bond failure of GFRP rebar occurred by delaminating resin and fiber in GFRP rebar, different to that of steel rebar (shearing off and crushing of concrete). For GFRP rebar, higher bond strength was obtained when a larger rebar diameter and a shorter embedment length were used, and reincrease of pull-out stress in softening branch was observed owing to wedging effect. Equations for normalized bond strength and development length of GFRP rebar embedded in UHPFRC with pull-out failure were suggested. In addition, analytical models for bond-slip response of GFRP rebar proposed in the literature were considered, and adequate parameters were derived from the present test data.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Concrete Corrosion and Durability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Composition of reactive powder concretes10.1016/0008-8846(95)00144-2 ↗
2. Effect of fiber content on mechanical and fracture properties of ultra high performance fiber reinforced cementitious composites10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.033 ↗
3. Material and bond properties of ultra high performance fiber reinforced concrete with micro steel fibers10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.081 ↗
4. Proposed classification of HPFRC composites based on their tensile response10.1617/s11527-006-9103-2 ↗
5. Jungwirth J, Muttoni A. Structural behavior of tension members in UHPC. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Ultra High Performance Concrete, Kassel, Germany; 2004. p. 533-544.
6. Structural behavior of ultra high performance concrete beams subjected to bending10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.07.017 ↗
7. Flexural behavior of an ultrahigh-performance concrete I-girder10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2008)13:6(602) ↗
8. Branson AK. Precast bridge deck joints using FRP and ultra-high performance concrete [MS thesis]. The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; 2013. p. 1–132.
9. Influence of reinforcing bar type on autogenous shrinkage stress and bond behavior of ultra high performance fiber reinforced concrete10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.11.014 ↗
10. Ametrano D. Bond characteristics of glass fibre reinforced polymer bars embedded in high performance and ultra-high performance concrete [MS thesis]. Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 2011. p. 1–132.
11. Hossain KM, Ametrano D, Mak C, Lachemi M. Bond strength and development length of GFRP bars in ultra-high performance concrete. Materials Engineering and Research Office Report, Ontario Ministry of Transportation;2011.p. 1–96.
12. CEB-FIP. Model code for concrete structures, CEB Bulletin d’Information. Comite Euro international du Beton, Lausanne, Switzerland; 1993.
13. Cosenza E, Manfredi G, Realfonzo R. Analytical modelling of bond between FRP reinforcing bars and concrete. In: Taerwe L, editor. Proceedings of second international RILEM symposium (FRPRCS-2). London: E and FN Spon;1995. p. 164–171.
14. Influence of ring size on the restrained shrinkage behavior of ultra high performance fiber reinforced concrete10.1617/s11527-013-0119-0 ↗
15. ASTM C 1437. Standard test method for flow of hydraulic cement mortar, ASTM International;2007. p. 1-2.
16. ASTM C 39/39M. Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens, ASTM International;2014. p .1–7.
17. RILEM TC. RILEM recommendations for the testing and use of constructions materials, RC 6 bond test for reinforcement steel. 2. Pull-out test, 1983, E & FN SPON;1994. p. 218–220.
18. ASTM C 469/C 469M. Standard test method for static modulus of elasticity and Poisson’s ratio of concrete in compression, ASTM International; 2014. p. 1–5.
19. Effect of shrinkage reducing admixture on tensile and flexural behaviors of UHPFRC considering fiber distribution characteristics10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.09.006 ↗
20. Interfacial bond strength of glass fiber reinforced polymer bars in high-strength concrete10.1016/j.compositesb.2007.03.008 ↗
21. Bond between carbon fibre-reinforced polymer (CFRP) bars and ultra high performance fibre reinforced concrete (UHPFRC): experimental study10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.02.006 ↗
22. Bond behavior of fiber reinforced polymer bars under direct pullout conditions10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:2(173) ↗
23. Effects of structural fibers on bonding mechanism changes in interface between GFRP bar and concrete10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.039 ↗
24. Bond behavior of the ETS FRP bar shear-strengthening method10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000280 ↗
25. Effect of fibers on the bonds between FRP reinforcing bars and high-strength concrete10.1016/j.compositesb.2007.11.005 ↗
26. Experimental study on bond performance of GFRP bars in self-compacting steel fiber reinforced concrete10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.07.009 ↗
27. Bond strength and load distribution of composite GFRP reinforcing bars in concrete
28. Bond-slip response of reinforcing bars embedded in plain and fiber concrete10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:6(503) ↗
29. ACI Committee 440. Guide for the design and construction of concrete reinforced with FRP bars (ACI 440.1R-06), American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Mich., USA;2006.
30. Development length of glass fiber-reinforced polymer bars in concrete
31. Behavior and modeling of bond of FRP rebars to concrete10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1997)1:2(40) ↗
32. Eligehausen R, Popov EP, Bertero VV. Local bond stress–slip relationships of deformed bars under generalized excitations. Report No. 83/23, EERC, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA;1983.