journal article·2013-06

Effectiveness of using fibre-reinforced polymer composites for underwater steel pipeline repairs

Md Shamsuddoha, Md Mainul Islam, Thiru Aravinthan, Allan Manalo, Kin-tak Lau

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Metal pipelines are the most efficient and safe ways for oil and gas transportation over a long distance. At present, almost all pipelines are made by ferrous steel which is sensitive to corrosion at harsh working environments, particularly in the presence of salty water and sulphur ingress media. For years, the most traditionally-credible solution for a damaged steel pipe is to remove the pipe entirely or just a localised damaged section and then replace it by a new one or cover with a steel patch through welding, respectively. Welding or fixing the steel patch is a bulky process especially if the location is underground or underwater. Thus, many researchers have been striving to find effective and safe repair solutions which are light, fast and easy to handle. Numerous literatures have shown that fibre-reinforced polymer-based composites can be effectively used for steel pipe repairs. Considerable research has been carried out on the repair of corroded and gouged pipes incorporating with fibre-reinforced composite wraps. This paper provides a comprehensive review on the use of fibre-reinforced polymer composites for in-air, underground and underwater pipeline repairs. Future developments and prospects on this are also discussed. Critical aspects of technical challenges, benefits and shortcomings in determining the feasibility and suitability for repair systems involving the composites are also presented.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Status of geothermal energy amongst the world’s energy sources10.1016/j.geothermics.2003.07.004 ↗
2. Kennedy · 1993
3. Pitting corrosion of metals a review of the critical factors10.1149/1.1838615 ↗
4. Galvanic corrosion of high alloy stainless steel in sea water10.1179/000705994798268033 ↗
5. Kopeliovich D. Pitting corrosion; 2009. [accessed 07.12.11].
6. Green cleaning ideas. Seawater corrosion; 2011. [accessed 08.12.11].
7. Corrosion behavior of X-70 pipe steel in near-neutral pH solution10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.04.066 ↗
8. Effects of saline aquifere water on the corrosion behaviour of injection pipe steels 1.4034 and 1.7225 during exposure to CO2 environment10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.080 ↗
9. Corrosion behaviour of pipe steels exposed for 2 years to CO2-saturated saline aquifer environment similar to the CCS-site Ketzin, Germany10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.488 ↗
10. T.D. Williamson Inc. Steel Repair Sleeves; 2007. [accessed 14.09.12].
11. PLIDCO Split+Sleeve. Permanently repairs a variety of pipelines; 2012. . [accessed 12.01.12].
12. Kou J, Yang W. Application progress of oil and gas pipeline rehabilitation technology. Beijing, China: ASCE; 26–29 October 2011. p. 1285–1292.10.1061/41202(423)136 ↗
13. Fibre-reinforced polymer composites for construction – state-of-the-art review10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:2(73) ↗
14. Cercone L, Lockwood JD. Review of FRP composite materials for pipeline repair. Pipelines; 2005. p. 1001–13.10.1061/40800(180)80 ↗
15. Patrick AJ. Composites – case studies of pipeline repair applications; 2004. [accessed 04.11.11].
16. Geraghty M, Pridmore A, Sanchez J. Transitioning from leak detection to leak prevention: proactive repair of steel pipelines using fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) composites. Pipelines; 2011. p. 100–7.10.1061/41187(420)10 ↗
17. The mechanical behaviour of composite-wrapped concrete cylinders subjected to uniaxial compression load10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00167-7 ↗
18. Application of FRP composites for underwater piles repair10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.07.011 ↗
19. Gibson · 2003
20. The Clock Spring Company. Clock Spring; 2011. [accessed 14.09.12].
21. Alexander C. Development of a composite repair system for reinforcing offshore risers. PhD thesis. Texas: Texas A&M University; 2007.10.1115/OMAE2008-57599 ↗
22. FRP materials for the rehabilitation of tubular steel structures, for underwater applications10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.05.029 ↗
23. Newberry AL, Bakhshaliyev R, Garnish M. World’s largest high pressure, large diameter GRP pipe project. Reinforced plastics; 2008 [September 2008].10.1016/S0034-3617(08)70305-9 ↗
24. Hille GM, Romer AE. Fiberglass Pipe Design for Water Mains. In: Proceedings of Pipeline Engineering and Construction, What’s on the Horizon?. August 1-4, San Diego, California. United States: ASCE;2004. p. 1–11.10.1061/40745(146)66 ↗
25. Non-metallic pipe systems for use in oil and gas10.1179/1743289811Y.0000000006 ↗
26. Picard D, Hudson W, Bouquier L, Dupupet G, Zivanovic I. Composite carbon thermoplastic tubes for deepwater applications. In: Offshore technology conference, Houston, Texas; 30 April–3 May 2007.10.4043/19111-MS ↗
27. Experimental and numerical investigations of external reinforced damaged pipelines10.1016/j.proeng.2010.03.129 ↗
28. Alexander C, Francini B. State of the art assessment of composite systems used to repair transmission pipelines. In: Proceedings of 6th international pipeline conference. Calgary, Alberta: ASME; 25–29 September 2006.10.1115/IPC2006-10484 ↗
29. Palmer-Jones R, Paisley D. Repairing internal corrosion defects in pipelines – a case study. In: 4th International pipeline rehabilitation and maintenance conference, Prague; September 2000.
30. Ehsani M. Latest advances in pipeline renovation with fiber reinforced polymer (FRP). Tucson, AZ, USA: ASCE; 12–15 September 2010. p. 200–208.10.1061/41203(425)20 ↗
31. Ehsani M. Superlaminate: the next generation of carbon FRP products for repair of pipelines. In: Climbing new peaks to infrastructure reliability-renew, rehab, and reinvest, keystone, Colorado, USA; 28 August–1 September 2010.10.1061/41138(386)124 ↗
32. Ehsani M. FRP super laminates present unparalleled solutions to old problems. Reinforced Plastics. Kidlington, Oxford: Elsevier Ltd., 2009. p. 40–45.10.1016/S0034-3617(09)70262-0 ↗
33. Worth F. Analysis of Aquawrap® for use in repairing damaged pipeline: environmental exposure conditions, property testing procedures, and field testing evaluations; 2005 [September 28]. [accessed 14.09.12].
34. Alexander CR, Wilson FD. Recent test results and field experience with Armor Plate® pipe wrap repairing corroded and mechanically-damaged pipes. In: Pigging conference, Houston; February 2000.
35. Integ Pipeline Services. StrongBack system overview; 2011. [accessed 17.06.11].
36. T.D. Williamson Inc. RES-Q Composite Wrap; 2008. [accessed 14.09.12].
37. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO). PIPEASSURE™ – a repair solution for subsea pipelines. [accessed 11.10.12].
38. Green M. Fiberglass repair systems give corrosion, impact protection to pipelines and risers. Offshore 2010;70(10). [accessed 09.06.11].
39. Light intensity effect on UV cured FRP coupled composite pipe joints10.1016/j.compstruct.2003.10.003 ↗
40. UV-cured FRP joint thickness effect on coupled composite pipes10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.05.009 ↗
41. Alshrif ZA, Saied RO, Abujelala MT, Elarbi MI. Experimental investigation on repairing of steel pipes using composite materials: part II. J Eng Res (Al-Fateh Univ.) 2009;(March):1–12.
42. Leong AYL, Leong KH, Tan YC, Liew PFM, Wood CD, Tian W, et al. Overwrap composite repairs of offshore risers at topside and splash zone. In: Proceedings of international committee on composite materials (ICCM-18). Jeju Island, Korea International Committee on Composite Materials; 21–26 August 2011.
43. Wet lay-up manufactured FRPs for concrete and masonry repair: influence of water on the properties of composites and on their epoxy components10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000132 ↗
44. WrapMaster. WeldWrap™. [accessed 14.09.12].
45. Mechanical behaviour of glass and carbon fibre reinforced composites at varying strain rates10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00194-6 ↗
46. Comparison of mechanical properties of glass fibre/vinyl ester and carbon fibre/vinyl ester composites10.1016/j.compositesb.2005.01.004 ↗
47. Flexural response of inorganic hybrid composites with E-glass and carbon fibres10.1115/1.4000670 ↗
48. The influence of short-term water storage on the flexural properties of unidirectional glass fibre-reinforced composites10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00355-6 ↗
49. Temperature effect during humid ageing on interfaces of glass and carbon fibres reinforced epoxy composites10.1016/j.jcis.2005.12.023 ↗
50. Characterization of the aramid/epoxy interfacial properties by means of pull-out test and influence of water absorption10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00147-1 ↗
51. Composite degradation due to fluid absorption10.1016/S1359-8368(00)00025-1 ↗
52. High-strength glass fibers and markets
53. Sleeper B, Arnold S, Carr H, Pridmore A. Carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) as a long term repair solution. Pipelines; 2010. p. 1133–42.10.1061/41138(386)108 ↗
54. Stress modelling of pipelines strengthened with advanced composites materials10.1016/S0263-8231(00)00049-5 ↗
55. Are natural fiber composites environmentally superior to glass fiber reinforced composites?10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.016 ↗
56. Application of natural fiber reinforced composites to trenchless rehabilitation of underground pipes10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.015 ↗
57. Galvanic corrosion of carbon and steel in aggressive environments10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2001)5:3(200) ↗
58. Béland · 1990
59. Strong · 2008
60. Effect of surface treatment and sizing of C-fibres on the mechanical properties of CFR thermosetting and thermoplastic polymers10.1016/0008-6223(87)90186-2 ↗
61. McCullouch · 1991
62. Repair of wood piles using prefabricated fiber-reinforced polymer composite shells10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2005)19:1(78) ↗
63. Hamerton · 1996
64. Analysis of a carbon composite overwrap pipeline repair system10.1016/j.ijpvp.2008.08.001 ↗
65. An alternative methodology to repair localized corrosion damage in metallic pipelines with epoxy resins10.1016/j.matdes.2009.02.026 ↗
66. Shamsuddoha M, Islam MM, Aravinthan T, Manalo AC, Lau KT. Mechanical properties of epoxy grouts for structural repair. In: 22nd Australasian conference on the mechanics of structures and materials, Sydney; 11–14 December 2012.10.1201/b15320-166 ↗
67. Sirimanna CS, Islam MM, Aravinthan T. Preliminary development of polymer based filler materials for GFRP tubular connector. In: ACMSM 21: incorporating sustainable practice in mechanics of structures and materials, Melbourne, Australia; 7–10 December 2010.10.1201/b10571-79 ↗
68. polymer based filler materials as infill for GFRP pile connector10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.471-472.763 ↗
69. Compressive strength characterization of polyester based fillers10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.410.32 ↗
70. In-situ measurement of chemical shrinkage of MY750 epoxy resin by a novel gravimetric method10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00199-4 ↗
71. Cure shrinkage characterization and modeling of a polyester resin containing low profile additives10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.06.020 ↗
72. Investigation of cure induced shrinkage in unreinforced epoxy resin10.1179/146580102225006350 ↗
73. AEA Technology Consulting · 2001
74. A non-linear finite-element analysis of buckle propagation in subsea corroded pipelines10.1016/j.finel.2006.05.003 ↗
75. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Manual for determining the remaining strength of corroded pipelines. ASME B31G-1991. New York: ASME; 1991.
76. DNV. Corroded pipelines. Recommended practice DNV-RP-F101: Det Norske Veritas (DNV); 2010.
77. Szary T. The finite element method analysis for assessing the remaining strength of corroded oil field casing and tubing. PhD thesis. Freiberg: Geotechnik und Bergbau der Technischen Universität Bergakademie; 2006.
78. Analytical solution for stress, strain and plastic instability of pressurized pipes with volumetric flaws10.1016/j.ijpvp.2011.11.002 ↗
79. 1989
80. Smith GE. Bond characteristics and qualifications of adhesives for marine applications and steel pipe repair. MSc thesis. Raleigh: North Carolina State University; 2005.
81. Australian Standard Committee MT/9. Metal finishing – preparation and pretreatment of surfaces, method selection guide. AS 1627, Part: 0. Homebush, NSW: Standards Association of Australia; 1997.
82. ISO. Preparation of steel substrates before application of paints and related products – visual assessment of surface cleanliness – Part 1: rust grades and preparation grades of uncoated steel substrates and of steel substrates after overall removal of previous coatings. ISO 8501-1:1988: International Organization for Standardization (ISO); 1988.
83. Thompson’s Welding Services I. Surface preparation standards cross reference. [accessed 11.10.12].
84. Freire JLF, Vieira RD, Diniz JLC, Meniconi LC. Effectiveness of composite repairs applied to damaged pipeline. Exp Tech Soc Exp Mech 2007;(September/October):59–6.10.1111/j.1747-1567.2007.00243.x ↗
85. Compressive strain limits of composite repaired pipelines under combined loading states10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.12.001 ↗
86. Moisture effects on the thermal and creep performance of carbon fiber/epoxy composites for structural pipeline repair10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.046 ↗
87. Effect of aqueous environment on the long-term behavior of glass fiber-reinforced plastic pipes10.1016/S0142-9418(03)00075-8 ↗
88. Dynamic mechanical analysis of carbon/epoxy composites10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.06.002 ↗
89. ISO. Petroleum, petrochemical and natural gas industries – composite repairs of pipework – qualification and design, installation, testing and inspection. ISO/TS 24817. London: International Organization for Standardization (ISO); 2006.
90. Analysis of burst tests and long-term hydrostatic tests in produced water pipelines10.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.01.011 ↗
91. Refurbishment of steel tubular pipes using composite materials10.1179/146580100101540770 ↗
92. Composite repair of through-wall defects in pipework – analytical and numerical models with respect to ISO/TS 2481710.1016/j.compstruct.2012.06.023 ↗
93. Leong KH, Leong AYL, Ramli SH, Tan YC, Johar RM, Chia MT, et al. Testing grouted sleeve connections for pipelines repairs. In: 3rd International conference on integrity, reliability and failure, Porto/Portugal; 20–24 July 2009.
94. ASTM Committee D20. Standard practice for obtaining hydrostatic or pressure design basis for “fibreglass” (glass-fibre-reinforced thermosetting-resin) pipe and fittings. ASTM D2992-2006. West Conshohocken: American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM); 2006.
95. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Repair of pressure equipment and piping. ASME PCC-2-2006. New York: ASME; 2006.
96. Alexander CR. Development of standards for composite repair systems. Pipeline & Gas Technology Magazine LP: Hart Energy Publishing; 2009.
97. Saeed N, Ronagh HR, Virk A, Ashraf M. Investigating the effects of pipe live pressure on the design of composite overwrap repairs. In: Proceeding of Australasian structural engineering conference, Perth, Engineers Australia; 11–13 July 2012.
98. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. ASME boiler & pressure vessel code. Rules for construction of pressure vessels, Sec. VIII, Div. 2, alternative rules. New York: ASME; 2007.
99. Biel RC, Alexander C. Applications of limit load analyses to assess the structural integrity of pressure vessels. In: Proceedings of pressure vessels and piping division conference. Denver: ASME; 17–21 July 2005.10.1115/PVP2005-71724 ↗
100. University of Southern Queensland. Pile rehabilitation. [accessed 10.10.12].