journal article·2019-12Open access

In-plane crashworthiness of re-entrant hierarchical honeycombs with negative Poisson’s ratio

H.L. Tan, Z.C. He, K.X. Li, Eric Li, A.G. Cheng, Bing Xu

Abstract

Abstract Both auxetic structures and hierarchical honeycombs are marked with lightweight and excellent mechanical properties. Here, we combine the characteristics of auxetic structures and hierarchical honeycombs, and propose two re-entrant hierarchical honeycombs constructed by replacing the cell walls of re-entrant honeycombs with regular hexagon substructure (RHH) and equilateral triangle substructure (RHT). The honeycombs are subjected to in-plane impact in order to investigate the crashworthiness by using the commercial software LS-DYNA. The plateau stress of RHH and RHT in x and y directions are derived by a two-scale method. The results from numerical simulation indicate that the specific energy absorption of RHT and RHH is improved by up to 292% and 105%. RHT and RHH improve the mean crushing force value by 298%, 108% respectively compared with the classic re-entrant honeycomb (RH) under quasi-static loading at stress plateau region. The RHT and RHH still have the characteristic of negative Poisson’s ratio. Additionally, the parametric studies are further carried out to investigate the effects of impact velocities and relative densities on crashworthiness. All the findings of this study indicate that the proposed two hierarchical honeycombs exhibit an improved crushing performance, and RHT provides the highest energy absorption capacity among all specimens.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Gibson · 1999
2. Heat transfer efficiency of metal honeycombs10.1016/S0017-9310(98)00306-8 ↗
3. Crushing analysis of metal honeycombs10.1016/0734-743X(83)90004-0 ↗
4. Mechanical behavior of hexagonal honeycombs under low-velocity impact - Theory and simulations10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.05.017 ↗
5. Honeycomb failure processes under in-plane loading10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.032 ↗
6. Experiments and full-scale numerical simulations of in-plane crushing of a honeycomb10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00453-9 ↗
7. In-plane dynamic crushing of honeycombs—a finite element study10.1016/S0734-743X(02)00056-8 ↗
8. Axial crush of metallic honeycombs10.1016/S0734-743X(97)00004-3 ↗
9. Probing the frequency-dependent elastic moduli of lattice materials10.1016/j.actamat.2018.11.012 ↗
10. Quasi-static impact of origami crash boxes with various profiles10.1016/j.tws.2019.04.028 ↗
11. Open-section origami beams for energy absorption10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.05.006 ↗
12. Auxetic materials: the positive side of being negative10.1049/esej:20000402 ↗
13. In-plane dynamic crushing of re-entrant auxetic cellular structure10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.086 ↗
14. The influence of cell micro-structure on the in-plane dynamic crushing of honeycombs with negative Poisson’s ratio10.1177/1099636214554180 ↗
15. Dynamic response of sandwich structures with graded auxetic honeycomb cores under blast loading10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.037 ↗
16. Impact and close-in blast response of auxetic honeycomb-cored sandwich panels: experimental tests and numerical simulations10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.020 ↗
17. Novel structure with negative Poisson’s ratio and enhanced Young’s modulus10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.11.036 ↗
18. A novel auxetic honeycomb with enhanced in-plane stiffness and buckling strength10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.090 ↗
19. Strong re-entrant cellular structures with negative Poisson’s ratio
20. Effects of cell microtopology on the in-plane dynamic crushing analysis of re-entrant square cellular material10.1007/s42154-018-0005-0 ↗
21. Design and modeling of auxetic and hybrid honeycomb structures for in-plane property enhancement10.1016/j.matdes.2016.12.067 ↗
22. A novel re-entrant auxetic honeycomb with enhanced in-plane impact resistance10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.024 ↗
23. Frequency domain homogenization for the viscoelastic properties of spatially correlated quasi-periodic lattices10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.09.004 ↗
24. Effective in-plane elastic properties of auxetic honeycombs with spatial irregularity10.1016/j.mechmat.2016.01.009 ↗
25. In-plane stiffness of the anisotropic multifunctional hierarchical honeycombs10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.06.020 ↗
26. In plane stiffness of multifunctional hierarchical honeycombs with negative Poisson’s ratio sub-structures10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.05.008 ↗
27. Out-of-plane crashworthiness of bio-inspired self-similar regular hierarchical honeycombs10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.02.014 ↗
28. On hierarchical honeycombs under out-of-plane crushing10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.08.013 ↗
29. Crashworthiness of hierarchical circular-joint quadrangular honeycombs10.1016/j.tws.2018.09.044 ↗
30. In-plane crashworthiness of bio-inspired hierarchical honeycombs10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.050 ↗
31. Crashworthiness design of novel hierarchical hexagonal columns10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.099 ↗
32. In-plane crushing of a hierarchical honeycomb10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.02.003 ↗
33. Crushing analysis of thin-walled beams with various section geometries under lateral impact10.1016/j.tws.2016.01.017 ↗
34. Wang G, Kou LY, Cong-Chang XU, Tuo YE, Luo-Xing LI. Finite Element Modeling for Compression Fracture Behavior of 6000 Aluminum Alloys Thin-Walled Structure. Materials for Mechanical Engineering. 2016.
35. Ductile fracture behavior of 6xxx aluminum alloy thin-walled components of automobile
36. Hierarchical honeycombs with tailorable properties10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.02.029 ↗
37. Experimental investigation of in-plane and out-of-plane crushing of aluminum honeycomb10.1016/j.msea.2012.01.070 ↗
38. Collapse of periodic planar lattices under uniaxial compression, part I: Quasi-static strength predicted by limit analysis10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.05.011 ↗