Dynamic indentation of auxetic and non-auxetic honeycombs under large deformation
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract It is generally acknowledged that the indentation resistance or hardness of auxetic materials is higher than that of their conventional counterparts under elastic deformation . However, this property of the auxetic material may not always be superior to that of the non-auxetic materials when the deformation is relatively large with plasticity considered. In this study, we come up with an index to quantitatively depict the indentation resistance of the hexagonal honeycombs under large deformation . The indentation resistance of both the auxetic and non-auxetic hexagonal honeycombs is compared and discussed. Results show that in the premise of honeycombs possessing the same relative density, the indentation resistance of auxetic hexagonal honeycombs is not always higher than that of the non-auxetic honeycombs. This phenomenon is verified by the numerical simulations. Further analysis shows that there is a critical value of the absolute value of Poisson’s ratio, which is determined by the cell-wall length ratio, to estimate the higher indentation resistance between the auxetic and non-auxetic hexagonal honeycombs. The influence of indentation velocity is also analyzed based on numerical simulations. This present work is supposed to shed light on the design and evaluation of the indentation resistance for both auxetic and conventional honeycombs.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Foam structures with a negative Poisson’s ratio10.1126/science.235.4792.1038 ↗
2. Deformation mechanisms in negative Poisson’s ratio materials: structural aspects10.1007/BF01130170 ↗
3. Auxetic materials — a review
4. Mechanisms of failure in the static indentation resistance of auxetic carbon fibre laminates10.1002/pssb.201083977 ↗
5. Honeycomb cores with enhanced buckling strength10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.09.021 ↗
6. A novel auxetic honeycomb with enhanced in-plane stiffness and buckling strength10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.090 ↗
7. Compliant hexagonal periodic lattice structures having both high shear strength and high shear strain10.1016/j.matdes.2010.08.029 ↗
8. On local indentation and impact compliance of isotropic auxetic materials from the continuum mechanics viewpoint10.1016/j.ijengsci.2012.01.010 ↗
9. On the conical indentation response of elastic auxetic materials: effects of Poisson’s ratio, contact friction and cone angle10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.10.020 ↗
10. Low-kinetic energy impact response of auxetic and conventional open-cell polyurethane foams10.1002/pssb.201451715 ↗
11. Review of auxetic materials for sports applications: expanding options in comfort and protection10.3390/app8060941 ↗
12. Analytical parametric analysis of the contact problem of human buttocks and negative Poisson’s ratio foam cushions10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00379-7 ↗
13. Suspension mechanical performance and vehicle ride comfort applying a novel jounce bumper based on negative Poisson’s ratio structure10.1016/j.advengsoft.2018.04.001 ↗
14. Impact and close-in blast response of auxetic honeycomb-cored sandwich panels: experimental tests and numerical simulations10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.020 ↗
15. Auxetic materials: functional materials and structures from lateral thinking!10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(200005)12:9<617::AID-ADMA617>3.0.CO;2-3 ↗
16. A triumph of lateral thought
17. Auxetic materials: the positive side of being negative
18. Indentability of conventional and negative Poisson’s ratio foams10.1177/002199839302701203 ↗
19. Auxetic polyethylene: the effect of a negative poisson’s ratio on hardness10.1016/0956-7151(94)90304-2 ↗
20. Indentation resilience of conventional and auxetic foams10.1177/0021955X9803400304 ↗
21. Novel variations in the microstructure of auxetic ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. Part 2: Mechanical properties10.1002/pen.11322 ↗
22. The strain dependent indentation resilience of auxetic microporous polyethylene10.1023/A:1004830103411 ↗
23. Effective elastic properties of auxetic microstructures: anisotropy and structural applications10.1007/s10999-012-9192-8 ↗
24. Seeing auxetic materials from the mechanics point of view: a structural review on the negative Poisson’s ratio10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.02.012 ↗
25. Gibson · 1999
26. The inhomogeneous deformation of polycarbonate circular honeycombs under in-plane compression10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2008.03.004 ↗
27. Dynamic crushing strength of hexagonal honeycombs10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.12.001 ↗
28. Mechanical behavior of hexagonal honeycombs under low-velocity impact – theory and simulations10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.05.017 ↗
29. In-plane dynamic crushing of re-entrant auxetic cellular structure10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.086 ↗
30. Strong re-entrant cellular structures with negative Poisson’s ratio10.1007/s10853-017-1809-8 ↗
31. The effects of Poisson’s ratio on the indentation behavior of materials with embedded system in an elastic matrix
32. Strain-rate effect and micro-structural optimization of cellular metals10.1016/j.mechmat.2005.05.018 ↗
33. Dynamic crushing response of auxetic honeycombs under large deformation: theoretical analysis and numerical simulation10.1016/j.tws.2018.04.020 ↗
34. Analyses on the dynamic strength of honeycombs under the y-directional crushing10.1016/j.matdes.2013.06.076 ↗
35. Numerical investigation on dynamic crushing behavior of auxetic honeycombs with various cell-wall angles