Blast response study of the sandwich composite panels with 3D chiral auxetic core
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Chiral auxetic cellular structures were fabricated from Ti6Al4V alloy using the Selective Electron Beam Melting method, and tested experimentally under quasi-static and dynamic compression loading conditions. The experimental results were used to validate built computational models of auxetic cellular structure in LS-DYNA. The models were used to study the geometry effect on the Poisson’s ratio of the analysed chiral auxetic structure. The response of sandwich composite panels with auxetic core under blast loading was studied extensively computationally, where the maximum panel displacement and the Specific Energy Absorption (SEA) of the composite panel were evaluated. Three different methods for blast loading (ConWep, Smooth Particle Hydrodynamic, Multi-Material Arbitrary Lagrange-Eulerian) were compared and validated based on the experimental data. It was determined that larger thickness of the cover plate lowers the panel maximum displacement, while the SEA is larger when thinner cover plates are used. Also, it was shown that the chiral unit cell amplitude effect on the maximum displacement and SEA is, in most analysed cases, negligible in comparison to the cell length effect, which is more prominent. The presented study illustrates great potential of using sandwich structures with designed auxetic cellular cores to improve the response of modern composite structures to blast loading.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. A Numerical study of auxetic composite panels under blast loadings10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.038 ↗
2. In-plane dynamic crushing of re-entrant auxetic cellular structure10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.086 ↗
3. 3D printed architected polymeric sandwich panels: energy absorption and structural performance10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.002 ↗
4. From stochastic foam to designed structure: balancing cost and performance of cellular metals10.3390/ma10080922 ↗
5. Molecular network design10.1038/353124a0 ↗
6. Auxetic cellular materials – a Review10.5545/sv-jme.2016.3656 ↗
7. Simulation and optimization of functionally graded auxetic structures made from inverted tetrapods10.1002/pssb.201600753 ↗
8. Tailored 3D mechanical metamaterials made by dip-in direct-laser-writing optical lithography10.1002/adma.201200584 ↗
9. Flexural properties of Ti6Al4V rhombic dodecahedron open cellular structures fabricated with electron beam melting10.1016/j.addma.2014.05.001 ↗
10. Ballistic resistance of honeycomb sandwich panels under in-plane high-velocity impact10.1155/2013/892781 ↗
11. Impact testing of polymer-filled auxetics using split hopkinson pressure10.1002/adem.201700076 ↗
12. Smart tetrachiral and hexachiral honeycomb: sensing and impact detection10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.07.017 ↗
13. A comparative study of ballistic resistance of sandwich panels with aluminum foam and auxetic honeycomb cores10.1155/2013/589216 ↗
14. Indentation resilience of conventional and auxetic foams10.1177/0021955X9803400304 ↗
15. Scaling the response of circular plates subjected to large and close-range spherical explosions. Part I: air-Blast loading10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.04.001 ↗
16. Scaling the response of circular plates subjected to large and close-range spherical explosions. Part II: Buried charges10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.04.002 ↗
17. Dynamic behavior of aluminum honeycomb sandwich panels under air blast: experiment and numerical analysis10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.10.034 ↗
18. Blast resistance of auxetic and honeycomb sandwich panels: comparisons and parametric designs
19. Blast resistance and multi-objective optimization of aluminum foam-cored sandwich panels10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.04.043 ↗
20. A comparative study of impulse-resistant metal sandwich plates10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2003.08.007 ↗
21. Multi-physics modeling of the fabrication and dynamic performance of all-metal auxetic-hexagonal sandwich-structures10.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.004 ↗
22. Dynamic response of sandwich structures with graded auxetic honeycomb cores under blast loading10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.037 ↗
23. Hallquist · 2006
24. A systematic approach to identify cellular auxetic materials
25. Phononic band gaps in 2D quadratic and 3D cubic cellular structures10.3390/ma8125463 ↗
26. Evolution of full phononic band gaps in periodic cellular structures10.1007/s00339-017-1278-6 ↗
27. Fabrication and characterisation of a fully auxetic 3D lattice structure via selective electron beam melting10.1088/1361-665X/26/2/025013 ↗
28. ISO 13314:2011 – Mechanical testing of metals – ductility testing – compression test for porous and cellular metals. n.d.
29. Hallquist · 2007
30. Mechanical behaviour of auxetic cellular structures built from inverted tetrapods at high strain rates
31. Mechanical characterisation of auxetic cellular structures built from inverted tetrapods10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.024 ↗
32. Zukas · 1998
33. Crush performance of multifunctional hybrid foams based on an aluminium alloy open-cell foam skeleton10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.03.009 ↗