Aluminum foam integral armor: a new dimension in armor design
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Closed-cell aluminum foam offers a unique combination of properties such as low density, high stiffness, strength and energy absorption that can be tailored through design of the microstructure. During ballistic impact, the foam exhibits significant non-linear deformation and stress wave attenuation. Composite structural armor panels containing closed-cell aluminum foam are impacted with 20-mm fragment-simulating projectiles (FSP). One-dimensional plane strain finite element analysis (FEA) of stress wave propagation is performed to understand the dynamic response and deformation mechanisms. The FEA results correlate well with the experimental observation that aluminum foam can delay and attenuate stress waves. It is identified that the aluminum foam transmits an insignificant amount of stress pulse before complete densification. The ballistic performance of aluminum foam-based composite integral armor (CIA) is compared with the baseline integral armor of equivalent areal-density by impacting panels with 20-mm FSP. A comparative damage study reveals that the aluminum foam armor has finer ceramic fracture and less volumetric delamination of the composite backing plate as compared to the baseline. The aluminum foam armors also showed less dynamic deflection of the backing plate than the baseline. These attributes of the aluminum foam in integral armor system add a new dimension in the design of lightweight armor for the future armored vehicles.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Cellular and Composite Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Performance metrics for composite integral armor10.1106/FR0L-T33W-JPD0-VFH3 ↗
2. Wilkins ML, Cline CF, Honodel CA. Fourth progress report of light armour program. Report UCRL 50694, Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, University of California; 196910.2172/4173151 ↗
3. Mechanics of penetration and perforation10.1016/0020-7225(78)90066-6 ↗
4. Computer simulation of penetration phenomenon
5. Viechnicki DJ, Anctil AA, Papetti DJ, Prifty JJ. Lightweight armor – a progress report. US Army MTL TR 89-8; 1989
6. Nicol B, Pattie SD, O'Donnell RG, Woodward RL. Fracture of ceramics in composite armors. In: Fracture mechanics in engineering practice. Melbourne University: Conference of Australian Fracture Group; 1988
7. Woodward RL, O'Donnell RG, Baxter BJ, Nicol B, Pattie SD. Energy absorption in the failure of ceramic composite armours. Materials Forum 1989
8. Numerical modeling of normal impact on ceramic composite armours10.1016/0734-743X(92)90281-W ↗
9. Some observations on the normal impact on ceramic faced armours backed by composite plates10.1016/0734-743X(93)90113-L ↗
10. Meyers · 1994
11. Curran DR, Seaman L, Cooper T. Micromechanical model for comminution and granular flow of brittle material under high pressure and high strain rate: application to penetration of ceramic plates. Progress report of SRI to the Office of Naval Research, Contract No, N00013-88-C-0734; 1991
12. Failure phenomenology of of confined ceramic targets and impacting rods10.1016/0734-743X(90)90002-D ↗
13. Enhanced ballistic performance of ceramics
14. Impact of metallic projectiles on ceramic targets: transition between interface defeat and penetration10.1016/S0734-743X(99)00152-9 ↗
15. Modeling the impact behavior of AD85 ceramic under multiaxial loading10.1016/0734-743X(94)90033-H ↗
16. Inelastic response of alumina10.1016/0734-743X(95)99888-X ↗
17. Modeling the shock response of silicon carbide, boron carbide and titanium diboride10.1016/0734-743X(96)89122-6 ↗
18. Experimental and numerical analysis of the response of aluminum oxide tiles to impact loading10.1016/0924-0136(94)01604-Y ↗
19. Florence AL. Interaction of projectiles and composite armor plate II. AMMRG-CR-69-15. Menlopark, CA, USA: Stanford Research Institute; 196910.21236/AD0698543 ↗
20. An investigation into the energy absorbed during ballistic perforation of composite armours10.1016/0734-743X(91)90029-F ↗
21. The optimization of two component composite armours10.1016/0734-743X(92)90145-J ↗
22. The optimization of two component composite armours10.1016/S0734-743X(05)80026-0 ↗
23. A simple one-dimensional approach to modeling ceramic composite armour defeat10.1016/0734-743X(90)90035-T ↗
24. den Reijer PC. Impact on ceramic faced armor. Ph.D. Thesis, Delf, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands; 1991
25. A new analytical model to simulate impact onto ceramic/composite armors10.1016/S0734-743X(98)00006-2 ↗
26. Simplified modeling of the ballistic behavior of fabrics and fiber-reinforced polymeric matrix composites10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.141-143.383 ↗
27. Walker JD, Anderson Jr CE. An alalytic model for a ceramic tile, substrate, and fabric. In: 17th International Symposium on Ballistics, Midrand, South Africa; 1998
28. Walker · 1999 · 1231
29. A study of fragmentation in the ballistic impact of ceramics10.1016/0734-743X(94)90122-2 ↗
30. Impact failure mechanisms in alumina tiles on finite thickness support and the effect of confinement10.1016/S0734-743X(99)00147-5 ↗
31. Investigation of bulging during impact in composite armor10.1051/jp4:1997353 ↗
32. Composite structure design guide. Composite Armored Vehicle Program. United Defense L. P.; 1997–1998
33. Fink BK, Gillespie Jr JW. Cost-effective manufacturing of damage tolerant integral armor. ARL Technical Report, ARL-TR-2319, September 2000
34. Monib A, Gillespie Jr JW, Fink BK. Damage tolerance of thick-section composites subjected to ballistic impact. CCM Report, No. 99-08, University of Delaware; 1999
35. Gama BA, Gillespie JW Jr, Mahfuz H, Bogetti TA, Fink BK. Effect of non-linear material behavior on the through-thickness stress wave propagation in multi-layer hybrid lightweight armor. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Comp Engineeering and Science, Los Angeles, CA, 2000 August, vol. I. p. 157–62
36. Mechanical properties of particle stabilized aluminum foam10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.217-222.1883 ↗
37. Yu CJ, Banhart J. Mechanical properties of metallic foams. In: Proceedings of Fraunhofer USA Metal Foam Symposium, Stanton, Delaware, 1997 October 7–8. p. 37–48
38. Deshpande VS, Fleck NA. Isotropic constitutive models for metallic foams. Technical Report, University of Cambridge, CUED/C-MICROMECH/TR.9, ISSN 0309–7420; November 1998
39. High strain rate compressive behavior of aluminum alloy foams10.1016/S0734-743X(99)00153-0 ↗
40. Metal foaming by a powder metallurgy method: production, properties and applications10.1007/s100190050082 ↗
41. Yu CJ, Eifert HH, Hall IW, Franz R, Leighton K. Feasibility study on deformation energy absorption of metal foams at high strain rates. FC-DE Report No. DAAG55-98-K-0002; November 1998
42. Deformation energy absorption of metal foams at high strain rates
43. Franz RE, Lawrence W. Stress measurements in glass during shaped-charge jet penetration. US Army Ballistic Research Laboratory Memorandum Report BRL-MR-3518; 198610.21236/ADA168947 ↗
44. Gama BA, Bogetti TA, Fink BK, Mahfuz H, Gillespie Jr JW. Study of through-thickness wave propagation in multi-layer hybrid lightweight armor. In: Proceedings of the 13th ASC Ann Technical Conference, Baltimore, MD, 1998 September 21–23. p. 1834–48
45. Investigation of high-velocity impact on integral armor using finite element method10.1016/S0734-743X(99)00047-0 ↗
46. Hallquist JO. LS-DYNA3D theoretical manual. Rev. 2. Livermore, CA: LSTC; 1991
47. LS-DYNA keyword user's manual. Version 950. Livermore, CA: LSTC; 1999
48. Chou CC. Honeycomb material models for simulating responses of foams. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International LS-DYNA Users Conference, Southfield, MI; 1998
49. Fink, BK, Gillio EF, McKnight GP, Gillespie Jr JW, Advani SG, Eduljee RF, Bernetich KR. Co-injection resin transfer molding of vinyl-ester and phenolic resins. Army Research Laboratory Technical Report, ARL-TR-2150; December 199910.21236/ADA373528 ↗