About the impact behavior of woven-ply carbon fiber-reinforced thermoplastic- and thermosetting-composites: A comparative study
Source abstract
Abstract
This study is aimed at comparing the response of TS-based (epoxy) and TP-based (PPS or PEEK) laminates subjected to low velocity impacts. C-scan inspections showed that impact led to diamond-shaped damage resulting from different failure mechanisms: fiber breakages in warp and weft directions, more or less inter-laminar and intra-ply damage, and extensive delamination in C/PEEK and C/epoxy laminates. The permanent indentation can be ascribed to specific mechanisms which mainly depend on many factors including the ultimate out-of-plane shear strength, and the interlaminar fracture toughness in modes I–II–III. In TP-based laminates, the matrix plasticization seems to play an important role in matrix-rich areas by locally promoting permanent deformations. Fiber-bridging also prevents the plies from opening in mode I, and slows down the propagation of interlaminar and intralaminar cracks in modes II–III. Both mechanisms seem to reduce the extension of damages, in particular, the subsequent delamination for a given impact energy. In epoxy-based laminates, the debris of broken fibers and matrix get stuck in the cracks and the adjacent layers, and create a sort of blocking system that prevents the cracks and delamination from closing after impact.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. An overview of the impact behavior of fibre-reinforced composites
2. The impact resistance of composite materials—a review10.1016/0010-4361(91)90549-V ↗
3. Impact behavior and impact-fatigue testing of polymer composites10.1016/0266-3538(92)90103-A ↗
4. Abrate · 1998
5. High-temperature damage tolerance of CRFP. Part 1: impact characteristics10.1016/0010-4361(94)90097-3 ↗
6. High-temperature damage tolerance of CRFP: 2. Post-impact compression characteristics10.1016/0010-4361(95)90408-R ↗
7. Repeated impact failure of continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastic and thermoset composites10.1177/002199839102500906 ↗
8. Some experimental findings in CAI tests of CF/PEEK and conventional CF/epoxy flat plates10.1016/0266-3538(95)00079-8 ↗
9. Thermoplastic composite cylinders for underwater applications10.1177/0892705705054397 ↗
10. Influence of matrix ductility and fibre architecture on the repeated impact response of glass-fibre-reinforced laminated composites10.1023/A:1020267013414 ↗
11. Impact and delamination failure of woven-fabric composites10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00166-9 ↗
12. Review: the role of reinforcement architecture in impact damage mechanisms and post-impact compression behavior10.1007/BF00353091 ↗
13. Impact behavior of cross-ply laminated composite plates under low velocities10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00134-3 ↗
14. An experimental investigation of the impact response of composite laminates10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.02.003 ↗
15. Impact response of Kevlar composites with filled epoxy matrix10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.05.025 ↗
16. Impact response of tough carbon fibre composites10.1016/0263-8223(89)90069-X ↗
17. Damage tolerance. Design for structural integrity and penetration10.1016/0263-8223(93)90018-L ↗
18. Performance of long fiber reinforced thermoplastics subjected to transverse intermediate velocity blunt object impact10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.07.023 ↗
19. Modeling and damage repair of woven thermoplastic composites subjected to low velocity impact10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.08.038 ↗
20. Impact behaviour and damage tolerance of woven carbon fibre-reinforced TP composites10.1016/0010-4361(90)90008-K ↗
21. Damage extension in carbon fiber/PEEK cross ply laminates under low velocity impact10.1177/002199839402800801 ↗
22. Cooling rate influence in carbon fibre/PEEK composites. Part III: impact damage performance10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00189-5 ↗
23. Aymerich F, Priolo P, Vacca D. Static loading and low-velocity impact characterization of graphite/PEEK laminates. In: Proceedings of the international conference on advanced mater, Hurghada, Egypt; 1998.
24. Impact resistance of cross-plied polyphenylene sulfide composites10.1177/089270578900200301 ↗
25. Spamer GT, Brink NO. Investigation of the CAI properties of C/PPS and C/APC-2 TP materials. In: Proceedings of the 33rd international SAMPE symposium: materials-pathway to the, future; 1988.
26. Effect of physical aging on the toughness of CFR PEEK and PPS composites10.1002/pc.750130607 ↗
27. Davies GAO. Design methodology to improve damage tolerance in composites. In: Brite Euram 3159-89 contract report, second ed., Dept. of Aeronautics, Imperial College, London; 1993.
28. Study of the mode I and mode II interlaminar behavior of a carbon fabric reinforced TP10.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.12.009 ↗
29. Davies P, Benzeggagh ML, De Charentenay FX. The delamination behavior of carbon fiber reinforced PPS. In: 32nd International SAMPE, symposium; 1987. p. 134–46.
30. Experimental and numerical study of delamination caused by local buckling of TP and TS composites10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00153-X ↗
31. O’Brien K. Composite interlaminar shear fracture toughness giic: shear measurement or sheer myth? Tech Memorandum, NASA; 1997.10.1520/STP13263S ↗
32. The effect of weave pattern and crack propagation direction on mode I delamination resistance of woven carbon composites10.1016/S1359-8368(98)00014-6 ↗
33. Impact performance of a woven fabric CFRP laminate10.1177/147823919600400803 ↗
34. Funk JG, Deaton JW. The interlaminar fracture toughness of woven graphite/epoxy composites. NASA tech paper 2950; 1989.
35. An experimental study of low velocity impact damage in woven fiber composites10.1177/002199839803201203 ↗
36. Jegley DC. Compression behavior of graphite–thermoplastic and graphite–epoxy panels with circular holes or impact damage. NASA tech paper, 3071; 1991.
37. Baker DJ. Mechanical property characterization and impact resistance of selected graphite/PEEK composite materials. NASA tech Memorandum 102769, AVSCOM tech, report 90-B-012; 1991.
38. An overall view on impact response of woven fabric composite plates10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.01.014 ↗
39. Frictional contact/impact response of textile composite structures10.1016/S0263-8223(97)80018-9 ↗
40. Impact characterization of graphite fiber reinforced thermoplastic laminates
41. Influence de la température sur le comportement mécanique de stratifiés tissés thermoplastique ou thermodurcissable
42. Woven ply thermoplastic laminates under severe conditions: notched laminates and bolted joints10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.12.025 ↗
43. Certification of the composite outer wing of the ATR72
44. Akkerman R, Warnet LL, Van de Ven EC. Impact damage in woven fabric reinforced composites. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on textile comp TEXCOMP’10, Lille, France; October 2010.
45. Experimental analysis of damage creation and permanent indentation on highly oriented plates10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.02.029 ↗
46. Thermoplastic resins
47. Toughness characterization of carbon fiber PEEK laminates10.1351/pac199163111609 ↗
48. Mode II interlaminar fracture of graphite/epoxy and graphite/PEEK10.1177/073168448600500302 ↗
49. A micromechanical model for the fiber bridgingof macro-cracks in composite plates10.1115/1.2787203 ↗