journal article·2006-01

Quasi-static strength and fatigue life of hybrid (bonded/bolted) composite single-lap joints

Gordon Kelly

Composite Structures· Volume 72· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

The strength and fatigue life of hybrid (bonded/bolted) joints with carbon-fibre reinforced plastic adherends have been investigated. The effect of adhesive material properties and laminate stacking sequence on the joint structural behaviour and failure modes were determined experimentally. Hybrid joints were shown to have greater strength, stiffness and fatigue life in comparison to adhesive bonded joints. However, the benefits were only observed in joints with lower modulus adhesives which allowed for load sharing between the adhesive and the bolt. Hybrid joints with high modulus adhesives showed no significant improvement in strength although increased fatigue life was observed due to the presence of the bolt. Three distinct stages in the fatigue life of hybrid joints were observed where the adhesive, the bolt and their combination were all contributing to the load transfer. Fatigue crack initiation was found to occur later in the hybrid joints where the bolt transferred a significant portion of the load. The failure mode of the joints was shown to be dependent upon the relation between the hybrid joint strength and the bearing strength of the laminate. Hybrid joints in which the strength greatly exceeded the laminate bearing strength failed catastrophically in net-section mode. In contrast, laminates with higher bearing strength failed in a non-catastrophic bearing mode. Careful comparison of the material bearing strength and adhesive bond strength is necessary to ensure increased joint strength and non-catastrophic failure.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. Bonded-bolted composite joints10.2514/3.45237 ↗
2. Hart-Smith LJ. Design methodology for bonded-bolted composite joints. Technical Report AFWAL-TR-81-3154, Douglas Aircraft Company; 1982.
3. Analysis of composite bolted/bonded joints used in repairing10.1177/002199801772662325 ↗
4. Montabone M, Nebiolo M, Vigada C. An investigation on a bolted-cold bonded joint for large diameter structures. In: 83rd Meeting of the AGARD SMP on bolted/bonded joints in polymeric composites, CP 590, Florence, Italy; 1996.
5. Fatigue of hybrid (adhesive/bolted) joints in SRIM10.1016/S0143-7496(00)00047-6 ↗
6. Fatigue strength of adhesive/rivet combined lap joints10.1080/00218469508014356 ↗
7. Load transfer in hybrid (bolted/bonded) composite single-lap joints10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.04.016 ↗
8. A backface strain technique for detecting fatigue crack initiation in adhesive joints10.1080/00218469508009975 ↗
9. ASTM D 638 02a Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics. American Society for Testing and Materials; 2002.
10. Bearing strength of carbon fibre epoxy laminates: Effects of bolt hole clearance10.1016/j.compositesb.2003.11.001 ↗
11. Investigating fatigue damage evolution in adhesive bonded structures using backface strain measurement10.1080/00218460213835 ↗
12. Hibbet, Karlsson, and Sorensen Inc. Abaqus/standard user’s manuals, V6.4. Pawtucket, RI, USA; 2003.
13. DiNicola AJ, Fantle SL. Bearing strength of clearance fit fastener holes in toughened graphite/epoxy laminates. In: Composite materials: testing and design, vol. 11. ASTM STP 1206; 1993. p. 220–37.10.1520/STP12630S ↗
14. Bolt-hole clearance effects and strength criteria in single-bolt, single-lap, composite bolted joints10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00088-X ↗
15. Truong Chi T, Lomov SV, Verpoest I. The mechanical properties of multi-axial multi-ply carbon fabric reinforced epoxy composites. In Proceedings of the 10th European conference on composite materials (ECCM-10), Brugge, Belgium; 2002.