journal article·2018-01Open access

Blast resistance of auxetic and honeycomb sandwich panels: Comparisons and parametric designs

Gabriele Imbalzano, Steven Linforth, Tuan Duc Ngo, Peter Vee Sin Lee, Phuong Tran

Abstract

Equivalent sandwich panels composed of auxetic and conventional honeycomb cores and metal facets are analysed and compared for their resistance performances against impulsive loadings. The dynamic behaviours of these structures are numerically investigated, taking into account the rate-dependent effects. The Johnson-Cook model is employed to describe the dynamic responses of the composite sandwiches subjected to high strain-rate loadings. Analytical models are derived correlating unit cell geometrical parameters and crushing strengths of the representative panels at different impact velocities. Parametric studies are conducted to evaluate the performances of different sandwich panel designs under impulsive loadings. In particular, transmitted reaction forces and maximum stresses on the protected structure are quantified for various design parameters including the geometrical factors and the effective Poisson's ratios. A quarter of the panel is symmetrically modelled with shell elements and the CONWEP model is used to simulate the blast loading. Auxetic panels demonstrate interesting crushing behaviour, effectively adapting to the dynamic loading by progressively drawing material into the locally loaded zone to thereby enhance the impact resistance. Meanwhile, conventional honeycomb panels deform plastically without localised stiffness enhancement.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (69)

Show source-provided references
1. A Numerical investigation of the performance of a nacre-like composite under blast loading10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.846.464 ↗
2. Influence of interfacial geometry on the energy absorption capacity and load sharing mechanisms of nacreous composite shells10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.05.045 ↗
3. Three-dimensional Voronoi model of a nacre-mimetic composite structure under impulsive loading10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.06.020 ↗
4. Bimaterial 3D printing and numerical analysis of bio-inspired composite structures under in-plane and transverse loadings10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.083 ↗
5. Bio-inspired composite structures subjected to underwater impulsive loading10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.09.033 ↗
6. Influence of architecture and orientation in 2-layers fabric structures10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.846.470 ↗
7. Influences of weaving architectures on the impact resistance of multi-layer fabrics10.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.014 ↗
8. Nonlinear dynamic response and vibration of imperfect shear deformable functionally graded plates subjected to blast and thermal loads
9. Foam structures with a negative Poisson’s ratio10.1126/science.235.4792.1038 ↗
10. Auxetic materials: functional materials and structures from lateral thinking!10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(200005)12:9<617::AID-ADMA617>3.0.CO;2-3 ↗
11. Mechanical behaviour of conventional and negative Poisson's ratio thermoplastic polyurethane foams under compressive cyclic loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.07.015 ↗
12. Poisson's ratio and modern materials10.1038/nmat3134 ↗
13. Composites with auxetic inclusions showing both an auxetic behavior and enhancement of their mechanical properties10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.02.026 ↗
14. Indentability of conventional and negative Poisson's ratio foams10.1177/002199839302701203 ↗
15. Auxetic compliant flexible PU foams: static and dynamic properties10.1002/pssb.200460386 ↗
16. Dynamic crushing of auxetic open-cell polyurethane foam10.1243/095440602321029382 ↗
17. Low-kinetic energy impact response of auxetic and conventional open-cell polyurethane foams10.1002/pssb.201451715 ↗
18. Experimental studies on the impact properties of auxetic materials10.1002/pssb.201384249 ↗
19. Impact Resistance and Failure Analysis of Plain Woven Curtains10.1260/2041-4196.6.1.113 ↗
20. How to make auxetic fibre reinforced composites10.1002/pssb.200460371 ↗
21. Graded conventional-auxetic Kirigami sandwich structures: Flatwise compression and edgewise loading10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.084 ↗
22. Novel stacked folded cores for blast-resistant sandwich beams10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.07.027 ↗
23. Dynamic response of sandwich structures with graded auxetic honeycomb cores under blast loading10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.037 ↗
24. Ju J. et al. Design of Honeycomb Meta-Materials for High Shear Flexure. In: Proceedings of the Asme International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Vol 5, Pts a and B; 2010: p. 805–813.10.1115/DETC2009-87730 ↗
25. Transverse elastic shear of auxetic multi re-entrant honeycombs10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.03.009 ↗
26. In-plane dynamic crushing of re-entrant auxetic cellular structure10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.086 ↗
27. Multi-physics modeling of the fabrication and dynamic performance of all-metal auxetic-hexagonal sandwich-structures10.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.004 ↗
28. A numerical study of auxetic composite panels under blast loadings10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.038 ↗
29. Three-dimensional modelling of auxetic sandwich panels for localised impact resistance
30. Influences of material and geometry in the performance of auxetic composite structure under blast loading10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.846.476 ↗
31. Gibson · 1999
32. Mechanical response of metallic honeycomb sandwich panel structures to high-intensity dynamic loading10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.06.008 ↗
33. Dynamic behavior of aluminum honeycomb sandwich panels under air blast: Experiment and numerical analysis10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.10.034 ↗
34. Performance of metallic honeycomb-core sandwich beams under shock loading10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.079 ↗
35. Dynamic crushing strength of hexagonal honeycombs10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.12.001 ↗
36. Post-buckling analysis of elastic honeycombs subject to in-plane biaxial compression10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00165-8 ↗
37. Experimental study of the out-of-plane dynamic compression of hexagonal honeycombs10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.02.024 ↗
38. The effects of foam filling on compressive response of hexagonal cell aluminum honeycombs under axial loading-experimental study10.1016/j.matdes.2009.09.030 ↗
39. Dynamic crushing of honeycombs and features of shock fronts10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.11.008 ↗
40. In-plane dynamic crushing of honeycombs—a finite element study10.1016/S0734-743X(02)00056-8 ↗
41. The inhomogeneous deformation of polycarbonate circular honeycombs under in-plane compression10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2008.03.004 ↗
42. Compressive response of circular cell polycarbonate honeycombs under inplane biaxial static and dynamic loading. Part I: experiments10.1016/S0734-743X(02)00011-8 ↗
43. Biaxial crushing of honeycombs:—Part 1: Experiments10.1016/S0020-7683(98)00224-8 ↗
44. Effect of cell-wall angle on the in-plane crushing behaviour of hexagonal honeycombs10.1016/j.matdes.2012.10.050 ↗
45. Analyses on the dynamic strength of honeycombs under the y-directional crushing10.1016/j.matdes.2013.06.076 ↗
46. Blast resistance and multi-objective optimization of aluminum foam-cored sandwich panels10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.04.043 ↗
47. Performance and failure of metal sandwich plates subjected to shock loading10.2140/jomms.2007.2.1947 ↗
48. A comparative study of impulse-resistant metal sandwich plates10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2003.08.007 ↗
49. The response of metallic sandwich panels to water blast10.1115/1.2178837 ↗
50. Ultralight, ultrastiff mechanical metamaterials10.1126/science.1252291 ↗
51. 3D-printing of lightweight cellular composites10.1002/adma.201401804 ↗
52. Cellular Ti–6Al–4V structures with interconnected macro porosity for bone implants fabricated by selective electron beam melting10.1016/j.actbio.2008.03.013 ↗
53. The out-of-plane compressive behavior of metallic honeycombs10.1016/j.msea.2004.03.051 ↗
54. Dynamic uniaxial crushing of wood10.1016/S0734-743X(97)00016-X ↗
55. Jahsman · 1968 · 365
56. Structural plastic shock model for one-dimensional ring systems10.1016/0734-743X(83)90005-2 ↗
57. Response of one-dimensional metal ring systems to end impact
58. Compressive stress-strain relations and shock Hugoniot curves of flexible foams10.1115/1.2804540 ↗
59. Collapse of periodic planar lattices under uniaxial compression, part II: Dynamic crushing based on finite element simulation10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.05.010 ↗
60. Deformation and energy absorption diagrams for cellular solids10.1016/0001-6160(84)90177-9 ↗
61. Ashby · 2000
62. Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9 ↗
63. Johnson GR, Cook W.H. A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Ballistics. The Netherlands; 1983.
64. G.R., J. and C. W.H. A Constitutive Model for Metals Subjected to Large Strains, High Strain Rates, and High Temperatures. in 7th International Symposium on Ballistics. 1983. The Hague, The Netherlands.
65. Flow and fracture characteristics of aluminium alloy AA5083–H116 as function of strain rate, temperature and triaxiality10.1016/j.msea.2003.08.027 ↗
66. Institution B.S. Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures: Part 1–1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings. British Standards Institution; 2004.
67. Modelling of reinforced concrete structures and composite structures with concrete strength degradation taken into consideration10.1016/S1644-9665(12)60105-8 ↗
68. Foam topology: bending versus stretching dominated architectures10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00379-7 ↗
69. Novel stacked folded cores for blast-resistant sandwich beams10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.07.027 ↗