Review on lattice structures for energy absorption properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Wikipedia. Crystal structure, 2021. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_structure.
2. Science Photo Library. Bone tissue: Animated coloured scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of cancellous (spongy) bone, dissolve.com, 2021. https://dissolve.com/video/Bone-tissue-Animated-coloured-scanning-electron-micrograph-rights-managed-stock-video-footage/002-D30-33-213.
3. Steve Gschmeissner. Nasturtium stem: Coloured scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of a freeze-fractured Nasturtium, Science Photo Library, 2021. https://www.sciencephot-o.com/media/ 203278/view.
4. Richard Schiffman. How neglecting bees could endanger humans, salon.com, 2013. https://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/follow_europes_lead_in_protecting_bees.
5. On sound insulation of pyramidal lattice sandwich structure10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.013 ↗
6. Nagesha BK, Dhinakaran V, Varsha Shree M, Manoj Kumar KP, Chalawadi Damodar, Sathish T. Review on characterization and impacts of the lattice structure in additive manufacturing. Mater Today: Proc 2020;21(1):916-919.10.1016/j.matpr.2019.08.158 ↗
7. Reddy AH, Davuluri S, Boyina D. 3D printed lattice structures: a brief review. In: Symposium on Additive Manufacturing and Applications (SAMA-2020), IEEE International Conference on “Nanomaterials: Applications & Properties” (NAP-2020), Sumy, Ukraine, 2020.10.1109/NAP51477.2020.9309680 ↗
8. Numerical and experimental analysis of the static compliance of chiral truss-core airfoils10.2140/jomms.2007.2.965 ↗
9. Magna Parva. Thermal Protection System, magnaparva.com, 2020. https://magnaparva.c-om/portfolio/thermal-protection-system.
10. Csi entwicklungstechnik GmbH. 3i-PRINT: individualize-integrate-innovate, 2017. http://www.3iprint.de/en.
11. Eureka. 3D-printed lattice structure absorbs vibrations and provides support, eurekamag-azine.co.uk, 2016. https://www.eurekamagazine.co.uk/design-engineering-news/3d-printed-lattice- structure-absorbs-vibrations-and-provides-support/144056.
12. TeamIndus Moonshot. Structural evolution of the TeamIndus spacecraft that will land on the Moon, medium.com, 2017. https://medium.com/teamindus/structural-evolution-of-the-teamindus-pacecraft-that-will-land-on-the-moon-b5aa6bc73ccc.
13. LEric Tingwall. How the Army Yanks a Humvee Out of a Plane and Drives It Away 750 Feet Later, caranddriver.com, 2015. https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a15352122/d-ropping-democracy-how-the-army-yanks-a-humvee-out-of-a-plane-and-drives-it-away-750-feet-later.
14. Structure design and multi-objective optimization of a novel crash box based on biomimetic structure10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.01.032 ↗
15. Introducing composite lattice core sandwich structure as an alternative proposal for engine hood10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.038 ↗
16. Harris JA. Additively manufactured metallic cellular Materials for Blast and Impact Mitigation. Cambridge: Univeristy of Cambridge; 2018.
17. Feasibility study on the use of a hierarchical lattice architecture for helmet liners10.1016/j.mtcomm.2018.02.002 ↗
18. Carbon. Carbon Lattice Innovation-The adidas Story, 2020. https://www.carbon3d.com/ white-papers/carbon-lattice-innovation-the-adidas-story.
19. Xin Ren, Raj Das, Phuong Tran, Tuan Duc Ngo, YiMin Xie. Auxetic metamaterials and structures: a review. Smart Materials and Structures 2018; 27(2): 3001.10.1088/1361-665X/aaa61c ↗
20. Isotropic octet-truss lattice structure design and anisotropy control strategies for implant application10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109595 ↗
21. Inhabitat. Guangzhou’s Elegant Canton Tower is the Tallest Building in China, 2012. https://inhabitat.com/guangzhous-elegant-canton-tower-is-the-tallest-building-in-china/2-44.
22. 3D Metal Printing Magzine. New Breeds of Bikes, 2017. https://www.3dmpmag.com/ magazine/article/?/2017/2/10/AM_Yields_New _Breeds_of_Bikes.
23. Tim Maloney. Interbike2004, Cyclingnews, 2004. http://autobus.cyclingnews.com/phot-os/2004/tech/shows/?id=interbike/isotruss/isotruss3-iblv.
24. Motor 1.com. Resilient Technologies honeycomb wheel, 2015. https://www.motor1.co-m/photo/300231/resilient-technologies-honeycomb-wheel.
25. Acanfora V, Corvino C, Saputo S, et al. Application of an Additive Manufactured Hybrid Metal/Composite Shock Absorber Panel to a Military Seat Ejection System. Applied Sciences 2021；11(14): 6473.10.3390/app11146473 ↗
26. On the effects of core microstructure on energy absorbing capabilities of sandwich panels intended for additive manufacturing10.3390/ma15041291 ↗
27. A feasibility study on additive manufactured hybrid metal/composite shock absorbers10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113958 ↗
28. Design and structural analysis of aircraft floor panel
29. Axial crush of metallic honeycombs10.1016/S0734-743X(97)00004-3 ↗
30. Static and dynamic properties of high density metal honeycombs10.1016/S0734-743X(97)00040-7 ↗
31. Crushing behavior of aluminium honeycombs under impact loading10.1016/S0734-743X(98)00034-7 ↗
32. Inertia effects on the progressive crushing of aluminium honeycombs under impact loading10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.05.005 ↗
33. Experimental study of the out-of-plane dynamic compression of hexagonal honeycombs10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.02.024 ↗
34. Impact behavior of honeycomb structures with various cell specifications—numerical simulation and experiment10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.09.001 ↗
35. Experimental and numerical studies on the crush resistance of aluminum honeycombs with various cell configurations10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.12.009 ↗
36. On the quasi-static and impact responses of aluminum honeycomb under combined shear-compression10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.05.005 ↗
37. Experments and full-scale numerical simulations of in-plane crushing of a honeycomb10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00453-9 ↗
38. Experimental investigation of in-plane and out-of-plane crushing of aluminum honeycomb10.1016/j.msea.2012.01.070 ↗
39. Effect of cell-wall angle on the in-plane crushing behaviour of hexagonal honeycombs10.1016/j.matdes.2012.10.050 ↗
40. Hexagonal cell structures under post-buckling axial load10.2514/3.1798 ↗
41. Crushing analysis of metal honeycombs10.1016/0734-743X(83)90004-0 ↗
42. A theoretical and experimental study on metal hexagonal honeycomb crushing under quasi-static and low velocity impact loading10.1016/j.msea.2011.03.009 ↗
43. Theoretical prediction and numerical simulation of honeycomb structures with various cell specifications under axial loading10.1007/s10999-011-9163-5 ↗
44. Gibson · 1997
45. Mechanical behavior of hexagonal honeycombs under low-velocity impact – theory and simulations10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.05.017 ↗
46. Dynamic uniaxial crushing of wood10.1016/S0734-743X(97)00016-X ↗
47. Dynamic crushing strength of hexagonal honeycombs10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.12.001 ↗
48. In-plane dynamic crushing of honeycombs—a finite element study10.1016/S0734-743X(02)00056-8 ↗
49. Compressive deformation and energy-absorption capability of aluminium honeycomb core10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.04.056 ↗
50. Design-oriented crushing analysis of hexagonal honeycomb core under in-plane compression10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.12.066 ↗
51. Investigation on the temperature dependent out-of-plane quasi-static compressive behavior of metallic honeycombs10.1016/j.tws.2020.106625 ↗
52. Numerical modelling of honeycomb core crush behavior10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.03.008 ↗
53. An experimental study on the compressive response of CFRP honeycombs with various cell configurations10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.044 ↗
54. Enhanced out-of-plane compressive strength and energy absorption of 3D printed square and hexagonal honeycombs with variable-thickness cell edges10.1016/j.eml.2017.09.016 ↗
55. Anisotropic in-plane mechanical behavior of square honeycombs under off-axis loading10.1016/j.matdes.2018.08.007 ↗
56. Compressive and shear properties of carbon fiber composite square honeycombs with optimized high-modulus hierarchical phases10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.080 ↗
57. Compressive response of circular cell polycarbonate honeycombs under inplane biaxial static and dynamic stresses—Part I: experiments10.1016/S0734-743X(02)00011-8 ↗
58. Dynamic compressive response of composite square honeycombs10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.11.022 ↗
59. Biaxial crushing of honeycombs-Part I: Experiments10.1016/S0020-7683(98)00225-X ↗
60. Strain localization in circular honeycombs under in-plane biaxial quasi-static and low-velocity impact loading10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.11.001 ↗
61. The inhomogeneous deformation of polycarbonate circular honeycombs under in-plane compression10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2008.03.004 ↗
62. In-plane elastic constants and strengths of circular cell honeycombs10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.05.009 ↗
63. In-plane elastic responses of circular cell honeycombs and bundled circular tubes in a diamond array structure10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.066 ↗
64. Sen Liang, H.L. Chen. Investigation on the square cell honeycomb structures under axial loading. Composite Structures 2006; 72: 446-454.10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.01.022 ↗
65. Mechanical properties of additively manufactured octagonal honeycombs10.1016/j.msec.2016.08.020 ↗
66. Post-collapse characteristics of ductile circular honeycombs under in-plane compression10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.11.011 ↗
67. Theoretical and numerical investigation on the crush resistance of rhombic and kagome honeycombs10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.028 ↗
68. In-plane biaxial crushing of honeycombs-Part II: Analysis10.1016/S0020-7683(98)00224-8 ↗
69. On the out-of-plane ballistic performances of hexagonal, reentrant, square, triangular and circular honeycomb panels10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105402 ↗
70. In-plane dynamic crushing behavior and energy absorption of honeycombs with a novel type of multi-cells10.1016/j.tws.2017.03.028 ↗
71. In-plane dynamic crushing of a novel circular-celled honeycomb nested with petal-shaped mesostructure10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111219 ↗
72. Cell geometry effect on in-plane energy absorption of periodic honeycomb structures10.1007/s00170-017-1037-z ↗
73. Compressive response of circular cell polycarbonate honeycombs under inplane biaxial static and dynamic loading—Part II: simulations10.1016/S0734-743X(02)00012-X ↗
74. Influence of internal pressure on the out-of-plane dynamic behavior of circular-celled honeycombs10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.02.004 ↗
75. In-plane crushing and energy absorption performance of multi-layer regularly arranged circular honeycombs10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.10.008 ↗
76. Optimizing crashworthiness design of square honeycomb structure10.1007/s11771-014-2018-0 ↗
77. Dynamic crushing response of auxetic honeycombs under large deformation: Theoretical analysis and numerical simulation10.1016/j.tws.2018.04.020 ↗
78. Dynamic crushing of double-arrowed auxetic structure under impact loading10.1016/j.matdes.2018.09.041 ↗
79. In-plane dynamic impact response characteristics of periodic 4-point star-shaped honeycomb structures
80. A novel star auxetic honeycomb with enhanced in-plane crushing strength10.1016/j.tws.2020.106623 ↗
81. In-plane dynamic crushing behaviors of a novel auxetic honeycomb with two plateau stress regions10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.12.009 ↗
82. A novel re-entrant auxetic honeycomb with enhanced in-plane impact resistance10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.024 ↗
83. A novel mechanism for generating auxetic behavior in reticulated foams: missing rib foam model10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00269-X ↗
84. Novel honeycombs with auxetic behavior10.1016/j.actamat.2005.02.006 ↗
85. Shepherd T, Winwood Dr K, Venkatraman Dr P, Allen Dr T. Validation of a finite element modelling process for auxetic structures under impact. Physica Status Solidi B 2020;257(10):1900197.10.1002/pssb.201900197 ↗
86. Elastic constants of 3-, 4- and 6-connected chiral and anti-chiral honeycombs subject to uniaxial in-plane loading10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.07.009 ↗
87. Auxeticity of monoclinic tetrachiral honeycombs10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112067 ↗
88. Elastic properties of chiral, anti-chiral, and hierarchical honeycombs: a simple energy-based approach10.1016/j.taml.2016.02.004 ↗
89. In-plane crushing response of tetra-chiral honeycombs10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.04.019 ↗
90. In-plane elastic properties of a 2D chiral cellular structure with V-shaped wings10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110384 ↗
91. Limiting strain for auxeticity under large compressive deformation: chiral vs. re-entrant cellular solids10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.11.035 ↗
92. Mechanical behavior of anti-trichiral honeycombs under lateral crushing10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.03.039 ↗
93. Mechanical property of anti-trichiral honeycombs under large deformation along the x-direction10.1016/j.tws.2019.106415 ↗
94. Mechanical property of re-entrant anti-trichiral honeycombs under large deformation10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.010 ↗
95. Negative Poisson's ratio effect of re-entrant anti-trichiral honeycombs under large deformation10.1016/j.tws.2019.04.032 ↗
96. Optimization design of chiral hexagonal honeycombs with prescribed elastic properties under large deformation10.1016/j.cja.2019.09.025 ↗
97. Properties of a chiral honeycomb with a Possion’s ratio of -110.1016/S0020-7403(96)00025-2 ↗
98. Shear resistance of an auxetic chiral mechanical metamaterial10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.06.005 ↗
99. Special characteristics of tetrachiral honeycombs under large deformation10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.04.020 ↗
100. The transverse elastic properties of chiral honeycombs10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.07.008 ↗