Damage analysis of panel sandwich reinforced with different fiber type under high-velocity projectile impact
Source abstract
Abstract
This study presents an experimental–numerical investigation of the ballistic response of asymmetric sandwich structures with aluminum–ceramic composite foam cores, aluminum face sheets, and intermediate fiber-reinforced composite laminates with various stacking sequences. Particular emphasis is placed on the measurement methodology and quantitative evaluation of impact parameters. Ballistic tests were performed using 5.56 × 45 mm NATO M193 and SS109 projectiles and 7.62 × 51 mm NATO M80 bullets. Projectile velocities were determined using synchronized optical gates and high-speed camera imaging, enabling accurate pre- and post-impact velocity measurements and energy calculations. The recorded signals were processed to determine projectile velocity reduction, absorbed kinetic energy, and specific energy absorption, with repeatability verified through multiple trials. The results indicate that the laminate architecture significantly affects projectile destabilization and energy dissipation. Hybrid carbon–glass configurations provided the highest ballistic efficiency, reaching velocity reductions of up to 100 m/s for the M193 projectile. Finite element simulations conducted in Abaqus/Explicit with Johnson–Cook and Hashin damage models were validated against experimental data, showing residual velocity discrepancies below 3%. The proposed measurement framework enables reliable quantification of ballistic performance and provides a validated basis for the design and optimization of lightweight protective sandwich structures.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Cellular and Composite Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. On the ballistic perforation resistance of additively manufactured and wrought maraging steel: experiments and numerical models10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2025.105271 ↗
2. Zhang · 2025 · 216
3. Dynamic response of stiffened plate under internal blast : experimental and numerical investigation10.1016/j.marstruc.2021.102957 ↗
4. Low-velocity impact of carbon, flax, and hybrid composites: performance comparison and numerical modeling10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118318 ↗
5. Enhancement of numerical model of low-velocity impact response of fibre metal laminates by adaptation of non-homogenous cohesive zone model and microstructural anisotropy of metal layers10.1016/j.compscitech.2025.111212 ↗
6. Structural response of the U-type corrugated core sandwich panel used in ship structures under the lateral quasi-static compression load10.1016/j.marstruc.2022.103198 ↗
7. Post impact flexural behavior investigation of hybrid foam-core sandwich composites at extreme arctic temperature10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110897 ↗
8. Residual flexural properties of CFRP sandwich structures with aluminum honeycomb cores after low-velocity impact
9. Experimental and numerical study of high-velocity impact behavior of carbon fiber honeycomb sandwich structures10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2025.105460 ↗
10. Mechanical responses and damage characteristics of the high-velocity impact of ice projectiles on foam sandwich structure10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2024.104994 ↗
11. Anti-ballistic properties of hybrid UHMWPE fiber-reinforced composite armour10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110941 ↗
12. Evaluation of the effect of the strain rate on the compressive response of a closed-cell aluminium foam using the split hopkinson pressure bar test10.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.050 ↗
13. Micromechanics-based simulation of quasi-static and dynamic crushing of double-chamber 6000-series aluminium profiles10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2023.104636 ↗
14. Bending behavior of empty and foam-filled beams: structural optimization10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.05.003 ↗
15. The effect of multilevel spherical triggers on the crashworthiness capacity of thin-walled structures10.1016/j.ast.2025.110299 ↗
16. Modeling approaches for ballistic simulations of composite materials : analytical model vs . finite element method10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110461 ↗
17. Numerical and experimental evaluation of maraging steel cellular topologies for ballistic panel design10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2025.105447 ↗
18. Energy absorption and mechanical performance of 3D printed Menger fractal structures10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.117774 ↗
19. Materials & Design construction and deformation behavior of metal foam based on a 3D-Vor - onoi model with real pore structure10.1016/j.matdes.2024.112729 ↗
20. High energy absorption efficiency of thin-walled conical corrugation tubes mimicking coconut tree configuration10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.08.041 ↗
21. Crushing behavior and energy absorption performance of a bio-inspired metallic structure: experimental and numerical study10.1016/j.tws.2018.07.051 ↗
22. Crashworthiness of bio-inspired multi-stage nested multi-cell structures with foam core10.1016/j.tws.2022.110245 ↗
23. Analysis of ballistic impact of 7.62 mm FMJ M80 rifle projectile into Twaron/UHMWPE composite armor10.3390/jcs7090390 ↗
24. Micro-architectured materials: past, present and future
25. Computational analysis and optimization of sandwich panels with homogeneous and graded foam cores for blast resistance10.1016/j.tws.2019.106494 ↗
26. Sandwich structures for energy absorption applications: a review10.3390/ma14164731 ↗
27. Quasi-static behaviour of crash components with steel skins and polymer foam cores10.1016/j.mtcomm.2018.09.015 ↗
28. Application of neural networks specific forms for estimation of crushing signal parameters of multilevel structural absorbers implemented in passive safety research10.1016/j.measurement.2024.115817 ↗
29. Biological materials: structure and mechanical properties10.1016/j.pmatsci.2007.05.002 ↗
30. Mid‐plane symmetrical bouligand structural design for robust multi‐impact resistance
31. Ballistic impact response of elastomer-retrofitted corrugated core sandwich panels10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2023.104545 ↗
32. Ballistic perforation of aramid laminates: projectile nose shape sensitivity10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117807 ↗
33. Influence of impact location and ceramic degradation on projectile defeat mechanisms in rod-reinforced ceramic-metal armor10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2026.105806 ↗
34. Dynamic impact response and failure mechanisms of carbonene aramid composites: a combined experimental and finite element study10.1016/j.compscitech.2026.111653 ↗
35. Engineering robust poly(p-phenylene benzobisoxazole)-silver hybrid fiber skeleton towards high-performance sandwich structured rubber composites with synergistic electromagnetic shielding, flame resistance and thermal conductivity10.1016/j.compscitech.2026.111558 ↗
36. Review of sandwich structures under impact loadings: experimental, numerical and theoretical analysis10.1016/j.tws.2023.111541 ↗
37. Body armour – new materials, new systems10.1016/j.dt.2019.02.002 ↗
38. Finite element method modeling strategies for fiber-based ballistic composites: from discrete fiber models to digital twins of fabrics10.1007/s11831-026-10616-5 ↗
39. Rogala · 2025 · 16
40. Energy absorption and impact behavior of composite sandwich panels under high-velocity spherical projectile10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.104143 ↗
41. Load-carrying capacity of thin-walled composite columns with rectangular cross-section under axial compression10.3390/ma17071615 ↗
42. The effect of eccentricity of load on the behavior of compressed composite columns in critical state10.1002/pc.24601 ↗
43. The investigation and fabrication of novel ballistic composites with checkerboard-shaped lay-up design to improve ballistic performances10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110511 ↗
44. Experimental and numerical study of ballistic resistance of composites based on sandwich metallic foams10.1007/s10443-021-09957-0 ↗
45. Effect of bond end shape on CFRP/steel joint strength10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115186 ↗
46. Modeling large strain, high rate deformation in metals
47. Low-velocity impact characteristics of closed cell AA2014-SiCp composite foam10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.054 ↗
48. Crashworthiness analysis of thin-walled aluminum columns filled with aluminum–silicon carbide composite foam10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116102 ↗
49. Limit states of thin-walled composite structures with closed sections under axial compression10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111813 ↗
50. Numerical and experimental investigations of the low velocity impact in GFRP plates10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.11.039 ↗
51. An energy-based concept for yielding of multidirectional FRP composite structures using a mesoscale lamina damage model
52. On the ballistic perforation resistance of a sandwich structure with aluminium skins and aluminium foam core10.1016/j.matlet.2023.135083 ↗
53. Ballistic response of sandwich shell panels: a comparative study10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2023.104548 ↗
54. Sadek
55. Zienkiewicz
56. Klaus-Jurgen · 1996
57. The effect of hybridization on the ballistic impact behavior of nanostructured hybrid composite plates