Influence of irregular R-curve behaviour on failure prediction of interface-toughened composite joints
Source abstract
Abstract
Interlaminar toughening is increasingly used to enhance the fracture toughness and strength of composite bonded joints. However, certain toughening strategies can introduce irregular fracture resistance behaviour during debonding, such as falling–flat or rising–falling–flat R-curve characteristics, whose influence on joint performance prediction remains unexplored. This study investigates the effect of such irregular R-curve behaviour on the modelling and strength prediction of interface-toughened composite joints by simulating debonding in single-step joints toughened with core–shell rubber (CSR) nanoparticles, polyphenylene sulfide (PPS) micro-fibre veils, and hybrid CSR–PPS systems using a bilinear cohesive zone model, validated against existing experimental results. Fracture energies are assigned to cohesive elements along the bondline using either experimentally measured crack-length-dependent fracture energies or crack-length-independent constant values. The results demonstrate that irregular R-curve behaviour introduced by PPS-veil toughening significantly influences the predicted debonding process and joint strength, and neglecting this behaviour leads to unreliable modelling. Furthermore, a selective local PPS-veil toughening strategy is explored, exploiting the elevated fracture resistance at early stages of crack growth. Appropriate localised toughening is shown to alter the debonding process and achieve improved joint strength compared with full-length toughening.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · High Temperature Alloys and Creep
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Static strength prediction of adhesive joints: a review10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102451 ↗
2. Adhesively bonded joints – a review on design, manufacturing, experiments, modeling and challenges10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111225 ↗
3. Characterisation of the fracture energy and toughening mechanisms of a nano-toughened epoxy adhesive,
4. Single lap joints bonded with structural adhesives reinforced with a mixture of silica nanoparticles and multi walled carbon nanotubes10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.10.007 ↗
5. Experimental determination of the static and fatigue strength of the adhesive joints bonded by epoxy adhesive including different particles10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.006 ↗
6. Enhancing shear and flexural strength of single lap composite joints with a graphene nanoparticle‐reinforced adhesive through a co‐curing technique10.1002/pc.28053 ↗
7. Improving the fracture resistance of sandwich composite T-joints by z-pinning10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.029 ↗
8. Concurrent use of Z-pins for crack arrest and structural health monitoring in adhesive-bonded composite lap joints10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107967 ↗
9. The influence of interlayer/epoxy adhesion on the mode-I and mode-II fracture response of carbon fibre/epoxy composites interleaved with thermoplastic veils10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108781 ↗
10. Interlaminar toughness of interleaved CFRP using non-woven veils: part 1. Mode-I testing10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.07.016 ↗
11. Interlaminar toughness of interleaved CFRP using non-woven veils: part 2. Mode-II testing10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.07.017 ↗
12. On the R-curve behaviour of carbon/epoxy laminates with core-shell rubber nanoparticle and micro-fibre veil hybrid toughening: carbon vs PPS veils10.1016/j.polymer.2022.125081 ↗
13. Carbon fibre composite joints co-cured by advanced PEEK/PPS meshes with outstanding fracture toughness10.1016/j.compscitech.2023.110200 ↗
14. Toughening strategies in adhesive joints10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.08.028 ↗
15. A review of methods for improving interlaminar interfaces and fracture toughness of laminated composites
16. On the static failure behaviour of co-cured composite joints with enhanced interlaminar fracture energies via multiscale toughening10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.116966 ↗
17. Local evaluation of adhesive failure in similar and dissimilar single-lap joints10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.05.029 ↗
18. The impact damage and residual load capacity of composite stepped bonding repairs and joints10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.096 ↗
19. Predicting fatigue damage in adhesively bonded joints using a cohesive zone model10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.12.013 ↗
20. Should the translaminar fracture toughness of laminated composites be represented by the R or the J curve? A comparison of their consistency and predictive capability10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.106867 ↗
21. Effects of bondline flaws on the damage tolerance of composite scarf joints10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.07.017 ↗
22. Modelling adhesive joints with cohesive zone models: effect of the cohesive law shape of the adhesive layer10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.02.006 ↗
23. Mixed-mode I+II fracture behaviour of thermoplastic composites and their adhesive bonded joints10.1016/j.compscitech.2025.111349 ↗
24. Finite element modeling of mode I delamination growth in laminated DCB specimens with R-curve effects10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.051 ↗
25. Progressive delamination and fiber bridging modeling in double cantilever beam composite specimens10.1016/S0013-7944(00)00131-4 ↗
26. A procedure for superposing linear cohesive laws to represent multiple damage mechanisms in the fracture of composites10.1007/s10704-009-9366-z ↗
27. A Mode I cohesive law characterization procedure for through-the-thickness crack propagation in composite laminates10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.03.071 ↗
28. A cohesive model with a multi-stage softening behavior to predict fracture in nano composite joints10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106611 ↗
29. Formulation of a mixed-mode multilinear cohesive zone law in an interface finite element for modelling delamination with R-curve effects10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.029 ↗
30. Piecewise-linear generalizable cohesive element approach for simulating mixed-mode delamination10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107484 ↗
31. Accurate simulation of delamination under mixed-mode loading using a multilinear cohesive law10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109233 ↗
32. Modelling the R-curve effect and its specimen-dependence10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.02.025 ↗
33. The static and fatigue failure of co-cured composite joints with two-scale interface toughening10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111867 ↗
34. Camanho · 2002
35. A continuum damage model for delaminations in laminated composites10.1016/S0022-5096(02)00075-3 ↗
36. Measurement of mixed-mode delamination fracture toughness of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites with mixed-mode bending apparatus10.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-X ↗
37. Delamination propagation criterion including the effect of fiber bridging for mixed-mode I/II delamination in CFRP multidirectional laminates10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.09.002 ↗
38. A simple procedure for determining the mode I bridging stress of composite DCB laminates without measuring the crack opening displacement10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112147 ↗
39. On controlling interfacial heterogeneity to trigger bridging in secondary bonded composite joints: an efficient strategy to introduce crack-arrest features10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107964 ↗
40. Virtual crack closure technique: history, approach, and applications10.1115/1.1595677 ↗