Low-Cost QA Benchmark for Fused Filament Fabrication
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The wide-scale use of low-cost fused filament fabrication (FFF) machines and their adoption for retail or manufacturing applications mean that there is a need to consider quality assurance in the manufacture of parts from low-cost machines. This article presents a low-cost method for evaluating the interlayer bond strength of FFF-made parts. Various tensile, flexural, and impact test specimens were designed, fabricated, and tested based on ISO standard methods, and on a new test jig to evaluate the strength of FFF-made parts. Tests conducted on the test jig were validated against those conducted on conventional testing machines. Analysis of variance was used to investigate the significance of processing parameters (layer thickness, fill density, and speed of deposition) on the mechanical properties. All the test types were observed to be sensitive to changes in processing conditions that affect the interlayer bond strength and hence the quality of the fabricated parts. Based on experimental results, the novel low-cost test jig does give an appropriate method for evaluating interlayer bond strength as part of routine quality testing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Newcastle University
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1017/S026357471000069X10.1017/S026357471000069X ↗
2. 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60206-610.1016/S0007-8506(07)60206-6 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00613-010.1016/S0924-0136(00)00613-0 ↗
4. 10.1108/1355254081086202810.1108/13552540810862028 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.01610.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.016 ↗
6. 10.1080/1042691000891297610.1080/10426910008912976 ↗
7. 10.1108/1355254031048963110.1108/13552540310489631 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.09510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.095 ↗
9. 10.1007/s00170-010-2882-110.1007/s00170-010-2882-1 ↗
10. 10.1108/1355254021044116610.1108/13552540210441166 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.25910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.259 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00953-610.1016/S0924-0136(02)00953-6 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00980-310.1016/S0924-0136(01)00980-3 ↗
14. 10.1108/1355254961073203410.1108/13552549610732034 ↗
15. 10.1108/1355254041052699910.1108/13552540410526999 ↗
16. Akande SO, , Dalgarno KW, , Munguia J. Quality assurance and process monitoring of fused deposition modelling made parts. 6th International Conference on Advanced Research in Virtual and Rapid Prototyping. 1–5 October, Leiria, Portugal. Taylor & Francis, New York, NY, 2013; pp. 31–35.
17. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.03810.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.038 ↗
18. BS EN ISO 180:2001 Plastics—determination of Izod impact strength. European Standards International Organization for Standardization Switzerland pp. 1–20.
19. BS EN ISO 527–1:1996 Plastics—determination of tensile properties. European Standards International Organization for Standardization Switzerland pp. 1–20.
20. BS EN ISO 178:2010 Plastics—determination of flexural properties. European Standards International Organization for Standardization Switzerland pp. 1–28.
21. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.05.01910.1016/j.msea.2006.05.019 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.08.08810.1016/j.matdes.2013.08.088 ↗