journal article·2003-08

Tight binding studies of exohedral silicon doped C60

P.A Marcos, J.A Alonso, M.J López, E Hernández

Composites Science and Technology· Volume 63· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract We study the exohedral doping of C 60 fullerenes by silicon atoms. The structural properties and stability of C 60 Si m aggregates, with m in the range 1–15, are investigated using a non-orthogonal tight binding model. For each cluster size an extensive set of possible configurations has been considered in order to increase the likelihood of determining the lowest energy structure. Each configuration was then minimised using the conjugate gradients algorithm. We find that for cluster sizes up to C 60 Si 5 the trend is for Si atoms to aggregate, forming a monolayer on the C 60 surface, while for C 60 Si m with m equal to 5 and beyond the trend changes towards the formation of three dimensional Si clusters attached to the fullerene surface. For m ⩾8 the additional Si atoms place themselves on the Si already present, and not directly on the buckyball surface. We have also conducted dynamical simulations of cluster fragmentation, which indicate that when the fragmentation of C 60 Si m takes place, it generates two homonuclear pieces, i.e., a Si m cluster and the C 60 fullerene, which remains intact, in agreement with photofragmentation experiments.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fullerene Chemistry and Applications · Graphene research and applications · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. Kroto · Nature · 1985 · 318 · 16210.1038/318162a0 ↗
2. Heath · J Am Chem Soc. · 1985 · 107 · 777910.1021/ja00311a102 ↗
3. Saunders · Science · 1996 · 271 · 169310.1126/science.271.5256.1693 ↗
4. Wan · Phys Rev Lett. · 1992 · 69 · 135210.1103/PhysRevLett.69.1352 ↗
5. Weis · J Chem Phys · 1994 · 100 · 568410.1063/1.467134 ↗
6. Springborg · Phys Rev Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 112710.1103/PhysRevLett.77.1127 ↗
7. Guo · J Phys Chem. · 1991 · 95 · 494810.1021/j100166a010 ↗
8. Yu · J Phys Chem. · 1995 · 99 · 181810.1021/j100007a002 ↗
9. Hummelen · Science · 1995 · 269 · 155510.1126/science.269.5230.1554 ↗
10. Kittel · 1976
11. Kimura · Chem Phys Lett. · 1996 · 256 · 26910.1016/0009-2614(96)00436-8 ↗
12. Fye · J Phys Chem A · 1997 · 101 · 183610.1021/jp962759w ↗
13. Ray · Phys Rev Lett. · 1998 · 80 · 536510.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5365 ↗
14. Pellarin · J Chem Phys · 1999 · 110 · 692710.1063/1.478598 ↗
15. Billas · Eur Phys J D9 · 1999 · 337
16. Pellarin · J Chem Phys · 2000 · 112 · 843610.1063/1.481447 ↗
17. Fu · Phys Rev B · 2001 · 63 · 08541110.1103/PhysRevB.63.085411 ↗
18. Billas · J Chem Phys · 1999 · 111 · 678710.1063/1.480018 ↗
19. Menon · J Chem Phys · 2001 · 114 · 773110.1063/1.1366697 ↗
20. Lu · Chem Phys Lett. · 2001 · 343 · 3910.1016/S0009-2614(01)00590-5 ↗
21. Porezag · Phys Rev B · 1995 · 51 · 1294710.1103/PhysRevB.51.12947 ↗
22. Goringe · Rep Prog Phys · 1997 · 60 · 144710.1088/0034-4885/60/12/001 ↗
23. Köhler · Phys Rev B · 1995 · 52 · 1183710.1103/PhysRevB.52.11837 ↗
24. Fowler · J Chem Soc, Faraday Trans · 1996 · 92 · 220310.1039/ft9969202203 ↗
25. Ayuela · J Phys Chem. · 1996 · 100 · 1563410.1021/jp961306o ↗
26. Fugaciu · Phys Rev B · 1999 · 60 · 1071110.1103/PhysRevB.60.10711 ↗
27. Hernández · Phys Rev B · 2001 · 63 · 19340310.1103/PhysRevB.63.193403 ↗
28. Hernández · Phys Rev Lett. · 1998 · 80 · 450210.1103/PhysRevLett.80.4502 ↗
29. Terrones · Phys Rev Lett. · 2000 · 84 · 171610.1103/PhysRevLett.84.1716 ↗
30. Frauenheim · Phys Rev B · 1995 · 52 · 1149210.1103/PhysRevB.52.11492 ↗
31. Klein · Phys Rev B · 1999 · 60 · 547810.1103/PhysRevB.60.5478 ↗
32. Gutierrez · Phys Rev B · 1999 · 60 · 177110.1103/PhysRevB.60.1771 ↗
33. Shevlin · Phys Rev B · 2001 · 63 · 19530610.1103/PhysRevB.63.195306 ↗
34. Sankey · Phys Rev B40 · 1989 · 397910.1103/PhysRevB.40.3979 ↗
35. Sanchez-Portal · Int J Quantum Chem. · 1997 · 65 · 45310.1002/(SICI)1097-461X(1997)65:5<453::AID-QUA9>3.0.CO;2-V ↗
36. Press · 1992
37. Binggeli · Phys Rev B · 1994 · 50 · 1176410.1103/PhysRevB.50.11764 ↗
38. Raghavachari · Phys Rev Lett. · 1985 · 55 · 285310.1103/PhysRevLett.55.2853 ↗
39. Pacchioni · J Chem Phys · 1986 · 84 · 330110.1063/1.450262 ↗
40. Tomanek · Phys Rev Lett. · 1986 · 56 · 105510.1103/PhysRevLett.56.1055 ↗
41. Verlet · Phys Rev. · 1967 · 159 · 9810.1103/PhysRev.159.98 ↗
42. Allen MP, Tildesley DJ. Computer simulation of liquids. Oxford; 1987.
43. Frenkel D, Smit B. Understanding molecular simulation. Academic Press; 1996.
44. Fragmentation temperatures obtained through dynamical simulations have to be viewed in conjuction with the time scale of the simulation runs. Longer simulation times produce smaller fragmentation temperatures. The temperatures reported here were obtained within simulation runs of 50ps.
45. Zhang · Phys Rev B · 1993 · 48 · 1138110.1103/PhysRevB.48.11381 ↗
46. Marcos · Eur Phys J D6 · 1999 · 22110.1007/s100530050304 ↗
47. Xu · Phys Rev Lett. · 1994 · 72 · 66910.1103/PhysRevLett.72.669 ↗
48. Kim · Phys Rev Lett. · 1994 · 72 · 241810.1103/PhysRevLett.72.2418 ↗
49. Weaver · 1994 · 1
50. Canning · Phys Rev Lett. · 1997 · 78 · 444210.1103/PhysRevLett.78.4442 ↗
51. Rey · Phys Rev B · 1997 · 55 · 719010.1103/PhysRevB.55.7190 ↗
52. Donadio · Phys Rev Lett. · 1999 · 83 · 77610.1103/PhysRevLett.83.776 ↗