journal article·2008-01Open access

Contact strength of ceramic laminates

Luca Ceseracciu, Emilio Jiménez-Piqué, Theo Fett, Marc Anglada

Composites Science and Technology· Volume 68· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Ceramic laminates with residual stress arising from thermal mismatch, show higher strength and larger apparent fracture toughness than their monolithic counterparts. For an effective improvement under in-service conditions, such enhancement should be reflected on the blunt-contact behaviour, characterized by an inhomogeneous multiaxial stress state. The contact strength test is an interesting alternative to traditional testing methods to evaluate contact-focused resistance of brittle materials. Because of the Hertzian-like stress state, high stresses can be generated far from the surface, producing failure from the weakest part of the structure, and this is especially true in pre-stressed materials, such as the one herein studied. In this work, experimental tests on a laminated ceramic are reported together with a FE analysis, showing a noteworthy improvement, although in some cases the composite structure may fail in an inner layer, and providing general tools for designing contact-resistant structures.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced materials and composites · High-Temperature Coating Behaviors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. Layered ceramics: processing and mechanical behavior10.1146/annurev.matsci.27.1.249 ↗
2. Crack deflection in ceramic/ceramic laminates with strong interfaces10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08455.x ↗
3. Residual stresses, strength and toughness of laminates with different layer thickness ratios10.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.008 ↗
4. Simple way to make tough ceramics10.1038/347455a0 ↗
5. Laminated ceramic structures from oxide systems10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.02.018 ↗
6. Indentation fracture response and damage Resistance of Al2O3–ZrO2 composites strengthened by transformation-induced residual stresses10.1111/j.1151-2916.1988.tb05818.x ↗
7. Prediction of the fracture toughness of a ceramic multilayer composite – modeling and experiments10.1016/j.actamat.2006.07.046 ↗
8. Monotonic and cyclic Hertzian fracture of a glass coating on titanium-based implants10.1016/j.actamat.2006.03.040 ↗
9. Influence of residual stresses on the wear behavior of alumina/alumina–zirconia laminated composites10.1111/j.1151-2916.2003.tb03512.x ↗
10. Hertzian contact fatigue on alumina/alumina–zirconia laminated composites10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2004.09.011 ↗
11. Surface contact degradation of multilayer ceramics under cyclic subcritical loads and high number of cycles10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2005.05.019 ↗
12. Test devices for strength measurements of bars under contact loading10.1520/JTE12385J ↗
13. Influence of stress gradients on failure in contact strength tests with cylinder loading10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00147-3 ↗
14. Crack growth data from dynamic tests under contact loading10.1016/S0955-2219(03)00626-5 ↗
15. Cracking of laminates subjected to biaxial tensile stress10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08946.x ↗
16. The fatigue behaviour of Mg-PSZ and ZTA ceramics