Contact strength of ceramic laminates
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Ceramic laminates with residual stress arising from thermal mismatch, show higher strength and larger apparent fracture toughness than their monolithic counterparts. For an effective improvement under in-service conditions, such enhancement should be reflected on the blunt-contact behaviour, characterized by an inhomogeneous multiaxial stress state. The contact strength test is an interesting alternative to traditional testing methods to evaluate contact-focused resistance of brittle materials. Because of the Hertzian-like stress state, high stresses can be generated far from the surface, producing failure from the weakest part of the structure, and this is especially true in pre-stressed materials, such as the one herein studied. In this work, experimental tests on a laminated ceramic are reported together with a FE analysis, showing a noteworthy improvement, although in some cases the composite structure may fail in an inner layer, and providing general tools for designing contact-resistant structures.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced materials and composites · High-Temperature Coating Behaviors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Layered ceramics: processing and mechanical behavior10.1146/annurev.matsci.27.1.249 ↗
2. Crack deflection in ceramic/ceramic laminates with strong interfaces10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08455.x ↗
3. Residual stresses, strength and toughness of laminates with different layer thickness ratios10.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.008 ↗
4. Simple way to make tough ceramics10.1038/347455a0 ↗
5. Laminated ceramic structures from oxide systems10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.02.018 ↗
6. Indentation fracture response and damage Resistance of Al2O3–ZrO2 composites strengthened by transformation-induced residual stresses10.1111/j.1151-2916.1988.tb05818.x ↗
7. Prediction of the fracture toughness of a ceramic multilayer composite – modeling and experiments10.1016/j.actamat.2006.07.046 ↗
8. Monotonic and cyclic Hertzian fracture of a glass coating on titanium-based implants10.1016/j.actamat.2006.03.040 ↗
9. Influence of residual stresses on the wear behavior of alumina/alumina–zirconia laminated composites10.1111/j.1151-2916.2003.tb03512.x ↗
10. Hertzian contact fatigue on alumina/alumina–zirconia laminated composites10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2004.09.011 ↗
11. Surface contact degradation of multilayer ceramics under cyclic subcritical loads and high number of cycles10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2005.05.019 ↗
12. Test devices for strength measurements of bars under contact loading10.1520/JTE12385J ↗
13. Influence of stress gradients on failure in contact strength tests with cylinder loading10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00147-3 ↗
14. Crack growth data from dynamic tests under contact loading10.1016/S0955-2219(03)00626-5 ↗
15. Cracking of laminates subjected to biaxial tensile stress10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08946.x ↗
16. The fatigue behaviour of Mg-PSZ and ZTA ceramics