The safety-factor calibration of laminates for long-term applications: behavior model and reliability method
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This paper presents a method for determining safety factors which must be taken into account when designing laminates for long-term applications. The method requires two steps: the first is a behavioral model able to predict time-dependent phenomena, and the second is a reliability method. The meso/macro approach is used in the behavioral model. This paper presents a damaged elasto-viscoplastic model able to predict the behavior of a layer made of a polymer reinforced with unidirectional fibers. This model requires a non-linear laminate theory which provides the response of laminate structures. The method for calibrating safety factors is based on the first-order reliability method. A description of the behavioral model in this method is presented. Finally, as a working example, the design of filament-wound pipe for fluid transportation is presented. A functional criterion is introduced to prevent leakage. The effect of material parameters is analyzed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Madsen · 1986
2. Ditlevsen O, Madsen HO. Structural reliability methods. John Wiley & Sons, 1996.
3. Exact and invariant second-moment code format
4. Nowick · 1972
5. Maire J-F. Etudes théorique et expérimentale du comportement de matériaux composites en contraintes planes. Thèse no. 282, Université de Franche-Comté, 1992.
6. Continuum damage mechanics for microcracked composites10.1016/0961-9526(93)90036-J ↗
7. Overall mechanical behaviour modelling of composite laminate
8. Richard F. Identification du comportement et évaluation de la fiabilité des composites stratifiés. Thèse no. 769, Université de Franche-Comté, 1999.
9. Optimization algorithms for structural reliability10.1016/0167-4730(91)90041-7 ↗
10. STRUREL. Reliability consulting program RCP. STRUREL (theorical manual), a structural reliability analysis program, 1993.
11. PROBAN. Reports of Det Norske Veritas. PROBAN—the probabilistic analysis program manuals. Hovik (Norway), 1989.
12. Basic analysis of structural safety10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1983)109:3(721) ↗
13. The gradient projection method for non linear programming10.1137/0109044 ↗
14. Structural reliability under combined load sequences10.1016/0045-7949(78)90046-9 ↗
15. Holland J. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. University of Michigan Press, 1975.
16. Goldberg DE. Algorithmes génétiques: exploration, optimisation et apprentissage automatique. Addison-Wesley, 1994.
17. Schwefel H-P. Evolution and optimum seeking. John Wiley & Sons, 1995.
18. Back T. Evolutionary algorithms in theory and practice. Oxford University Press, 1995.10.1093/oso/9780195099713.001.0001 ↗
19. Fogel DB. Evolutionary computation. Toward a new philosophy of machine intelligence. IEEE Press, 1995.
20. Form and rate of corrosion-resistant FRP resins10.1163/156855191X00063 ↗
21. Jones CJ, Dickson RF, Adam T, Reiter H, Harris B. Les effets de l'environnement sur la fatigue de divers matériaux composites. JNC 3, Paris, 1992. p. 75–86.
22. Rousseau J. Une approche expérimentale et théorique de l'effet du procédé de fabrication sur les performances d'une structure composite: cas de l'enroulement filamentaire. Thèse no. 615, Université de Franche-Comté, 1997.