Size effects in layered composites – Defect tolerance and strength optimization
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Mixture of hard and soft phases in a smart way makes strong and tough materials – this approach, inspired by natural composites, has been widely adopted by scientists and engineers. Behind it exist many interesting fundamental mechanics. In this study, we solve analytically the stress intensity factor for a crack propagating from the hard to the soft phase in a layered composite starting with the postulation on the crack profile inspired by the shear-lag model. Our analysis shows that when a crack extends from the hard phase into the soft one, the stress intensity factor amplifies first at the hard-soft interface and then declines quickly to zero as it progresses toward the next hard phase. This crack arresting mechanism works until a secondary crack initiates in the next hard layer and then merges with the main crack. The efficiency of the defect tolerance, measured by the effective strength of the layered composite, is found to exhibit strong size effects. Overall, the smaller the dimensions of two phases are, the more efficiently of the layered composites tolerate defects. Furthermore, if the dimension of one phase is given, there always exists a critical dimension of the other phase that optimizes the efficiency (or the composite strength). A relationship between the defect tolerance efficiency with the nanostructures which is analogous to the famous “Hall-Petch” and “inverse Hall-Petch” relationships for polycrystalline metals is found. The analysis in this work can be used to guide the micro-to nano-structure design for synthesizing innovative defect-tolerant composites.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Graphene research and applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. The conflicts between strength and toughness10.1038/nmat3115 ↗
2. The material bone: structure-mechanical function relations10.1146/annurev.matsci.28.1.271 ↗
3. Structural basis for the fracture toughness of the shell of the conch Strombus gigas10.1038/35016535 ↗
4. Mechanistic fracture criteria for the failure of human cortical bone10.1038/nmat832 ↗
5. Skeleton of Euplectella sp.: structural hierarchy from the nanoscale to the macroscale10.1126/science.1112255 ↗
6. Why is nacre so tough and strong?10.1016/j.msec.2005.08.013 ↗
7. Micromechanical properties of biological silica in skeletons of deep-sea sponges10.1557/jmr.2006.0251 ↗
8. On the mechanistic origins of toughness in bone10.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104427 ↗
9. Teeth: among nature's most durable biocomposites10.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104537 ↗
10. Crack point stress singularities at a bi-material interface10.1115/1.3630064 ↗
11. The stress distribution around a crack perpendicular to an interface between materials10.1007/BF00182624 ↗
12. Stresses in bonded materials with a crack perpendicular to the interface10.1016/0020-7225(72)90063-8 ↗
13. Two bonded half planes with a crack going through the interface10.1016/0020-7225(73)90004-9 ↗
14. Fracture of nonhomogeneous materials10.1007/BF00042121 ↗
15. Crack deflection at an interface between dissimilar elastic materials10.1016/0020-7683(89)90021-8 ↗
16. A crack very close to a bimaterial interface
17. Stress state in front of a crack perpendicular to bimaterial interface10.1016/S0013-7944(97)00150-1 ↗
18. Stress intensity factors in two bonded elastic layers containing cracks perpendicular to and on the interface
19. On the fracture behavior of inhomogeneous materials––A case study for elastically inhomogeneous bimaterials10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.06.064 ↗
20. Inhomogeneity effects on the crack driving force in elastic and elastic–plastic materials10.1016/S0022-5096(02)00025-X ↗
21. Crack tip shielding or anti-shielding due to smooth and discontinuous material inhomogeneities10.1007/s10704-005-3944-5 ↗
22. Enhanced protective role in materials with gradient structural orientations: lessons from Nature10.1016/j.actbio.2016.08.005 ↗
23. Investigation of deformation mechanisms of staggered nanocomposites using molecular dynamics10.1016/j.physleta.2016.06.046 ↗
24. Bio-inspired design of SiCf-reinforced multi-layered Ti-intermetallic composite10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.138 ↗
25. Discrete-element modeling of nacre-like materials: effects of random microstructures on strain localization and mechanical performance10.1016/j.jmps.2017.11.003 ↗
26. Crack propagation in staggered structures of biological and biomimetic composites10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.09.029 ↗
27. Distinct failure modes in bio-inspired 3D-printed staggered composites under non-aligned loadings10.1088/1361-665X/aa59eb ↗
28. Hindered crack propagation in materials with periodically varying Young's modulus—lessons from biological materials10.1002/adma.200602394 ↗
29. Bioinspired design criteria for damage‐resistant materials with periodically varying microstructure10.1002/adfm.201100443 ↗
30. Effective toughness of heterogeneous media10.1016/j.jmps.2014.06.002 ↗
31. Cohesive fracture of elastically heterogeneous materials: an integrative modeling and experimental study10.1016/j.jmps.2016.09.004 ↗
32. Mixed mode cracking in layered materials10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70164-9 ↗
33. The elasticity and strength of paper and other fibrous materials10.1088/0508-3443/3/3/302 ↗
34. Lawn · 1993
35. The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids10.1098/rsta.1921.0006 ↗
36. Bazant · 1997
37. Materials become insensitive to flaws at nanoscale: lessons from nature10.1073/pnas.0631609100 ↗
38. The deformation and ageing of mild steel: III discussion of results10.1088/0370-1301/64/9/303 ↗
39. The cleavage strengh of polycrystals
40. Softening of nanocrystalline metals at very small grain sizes10.1038/35328 ↗