Phase field predictions of microscopic fracture and R-curve behaviour of fibre-reinforced composites
Source abstract
Abstract
We present a computational framework to explore the effect of microstructure and constituent properties upon the fracture toughness of fibre-reinforced polymer composites. To capture microscopic matrix cracking and fibre-matrix debonding, the framework couples the phase field fracture method and a cohesive zone model in the context of the finite element method. Virtual single-notched three point bending tests are conducted. The actual microstructure of the composite is simulated by an embedded cell in the fracture process zone, while the remaining area is homogenised to be an anisotropic elastic solid. A detailed comparison of the predicted results with experimental observations reveals that it is possible to accurately capture the crack path, interface debonding and load versus displacement response. The sensitivity of the crack growth resistance curve (R-curve) to the matrix fracture toughness and the fibre-matrix interface properties is determined. The influence of porosity upon the R-curve of fibre-reinforced composites is also explored, revealing a stabler response with increasing void volume fraction. These results shed light into microscopic fracture mechanisms and set the basis for efficient design of high fracture toughness composites.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Composite Material Mechanics · Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Predicting low velocity impact damage and Compression-After-Impact (CAI) behaviour of composite laminates10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.01.025 ↗
2. The interlaminar and intralaminar fracture toughness of carbon-fibre/polymer composites: the effect of temperature10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00047-X ↗
3. The role of material characterisation in the crush modelling of thermoplastic composite structures10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.07.011 ↗
4. Translaminar fracture toughness testing of composites: a review10.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.01.002 ↗
5. Hygrothermal effects on the translaminar fracture toughness of cross-ply carbon/epoxy laminates: failure mechanisms10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.10.020 ↗
6. Multiscale modeling of composite materials: a roadmap towards virtual testing10.1002/adma.201101683 ↗
7. The role of interfacial properties on the intralaminar and interlaminar damage behaviour of unidirectional composite laminates: experimental characterization and multiscale modelling10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.11.043 ↗
8. A numerical framework to analyze fracture in composite materials: from R-curves to homogenized softening laws10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.10.031 ↗
9. Mixed-mode decohesion finite elements for the simulation of delamination in composite materials
10. Intraply fracture of fiber-reinforced composites: microscopic mechanisms and modeling10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.04.008 ↗
11. Continuum damage mechanics: Part I - general concepts10.1115/1.3173661 ↗
12. Modelling and simulation methodology for unidirectional composite laminates in a Virtual Test Lab framework10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.02.016 ↗
13. A review of extended/generalized finite element methods for material modeling, Model
14. A floating node method for the modelling of discontinuities in composites10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.05.018 ↗
15. Numerical experiments in revisited brittle fracture10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00028-9 ↗
16. A phase field model for rate-independent crack propagation: robust algorithmic implementation based on operator splits10.1016/j.cma.2010.04.011 ↗
17. Phase field fracture modelling using quasi-Newton methods and a new adaptive step scheme10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.102446 ↗
18. Phase-field modelling of fracture10.1016/bs.aams.2019.08.001 ↗
19. The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids
20. A 3D transversally isotropic constitutive model for advanced composites implemented in a high performance computing code10.1016/j.euromechsol.2018.03.021 ↗
21. A phase field approach to simulate intralaminar and translaminar fracture in long fiber composite materials10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.007 ↗
22. A phase field approach to simulate intralaminar and translaminar fracture in long fiber composite materials10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.007 ↗
23. A phase field approach enhanced with a cohesive zone model for modeling delamination induced by matrix cracking10.1016/j.cma.2019.112618 ↗
24. A phase-field model for strength and fracture analyses of fiber-reinforced composites10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.10.031 ↗
25. Revisiting brittle fracture as an energy minimization problem10.1016/S0022-5096(98)00034-9 ↗
26. Crack nucleation in variational phase-field models of brittle fracture10.1016/j.jmps.2017.09.006 ↗
27. Phase field modelling of crack propagation in functionally graded materials10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.04.003 ↗
28. A phase field formulation for hydrogen assisted cracking10.1016/j.cma.2018.07.021 ↗
29. A multiscale methodology quantifying the sintering temperature-dependent mechanical properties of oxide matrix composites10.1111/jace.15473 ↗
30. ASTM · 1820
31. A phase field model for elastic-gradient-plastic solids undergoing hydrogen embrittlement10.1016/j.jmps.2020.104093 ↗
32. A numerical study of the influence of microvoids in the transverse mechanical response of unidirectional composites10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.04.004 ↗
33. Effect of curing cycle on void distribution and interlaminar shear strength in polymer-matrix composites10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.05.002 ↗
34. Effects of cure cycle pressure and voids on some mechanical properties of carbon/epoxy laminates10.1016/0010-4361(95)96808-J ↗
35. High fracture toughness micro-architectured materials10.1016/j.jmps.2020.104060 ↗