journal article·2009-05

Effects of camber height and boundary condition on energy absorption of arched composite laminates

Peter J. Schulz, Dahsin Liu

Composites Science and Technology· Volume 69· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The scope of this study on arched composite laminates subjected to low-velocity impact was two-fold. One was to investigate the effect of camber height on energy absorption and the other the effect of boundary condition on energy absorption. All specimens were made of the same prepreg tape material and a cross-ply stacking sequence of [0/90]3s such that a comparison among flat panels and arched specimens with various camber heights can be made. Analysis on the load–deflection relation, the energy profile and the damage process were of primary interest as they provided the insight into the impact behavior of arched composites. Experimental results showed that the maximum deflection and the energy absorption increased significantly as the camber height increased while the peak load decreased slightly. It was also found that the boundary condition played an important role in the energy absorption process. Frame-clamped specimens experienced higher slippage, and hence higher energy absorption, than bolted specimens. This slippage was observed after impact because the specimen actually would pull out of the frame. Video footage also verified this phenomenon.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Textile materials and evaluations · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. Low velocity impact response of small angle laminated composites10.2514/1.22380 ↗
2. Kistler LS. Experimental investigation of the impact response of cylindrically curved laminated composite panels. In: AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, 35th, Hilton Head, SC, April 18–20, 1994. Technical Papers, Pt. 4 (A94-23876 06-39). Washington, DC: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics; 1994. pp. 2292–97.
3. Kistler LS. Low velocity impact on curved laminated composite panels. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Michigan; 1996.
4. On the response of curved laminated panels subjected to transverse impact loads10.1016/S0020-7683(98)00005-5 ↗
5. Characterization of impact damages and responses in CFRP composite shells
6. Ambur DR, Chunchu PB, Rose CA, Feraboli P, Jackson WC. Scaling the non-linear impact response of flat and curved anisotropic composite panels. In: 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, dynamics and materials conference, No. 2005–2224, Austin, TX; 2005.
7. Ambur DR, Starnes Jr H. Effect of curvature on the impact damage characteristics and residual strength of composite plates. In: 39th AIAA/ASME/ASCHE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, AIAA Paper No. 98–1881; 1998.10.2514/6.1998-1881 ↗
8. Low-velocity impact damage accumulation in woven S2-glass composite systems10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.11.005 ↗
9. Post-impact compressive strength of curved GFRP laminates10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00175-6 ↗
10. Prediction of damage in composite cylinders after impact10.1177/0021998305048733 ↗
11. Coppens, George J. Effects of three-dimensional geometry on penetration and perforation resistance. M.S. thesis, Michigan State University; 2004.
12. Wardle, Brian L. Buckling and damage resistance of transversely loaded composite shells. Ph.D. dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1998.
13. Buckling and large deformation behaviour of composite domes compressed between rigid platens10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.05.007 ↗
14. Nondimensional parameters and equations for buckling of symmetrically laminated thin elastic shallow shells
15. Mechanics of integral armor: discontinuous ceramic-cored sandwich structure under tension and shear10.1016/S0263-8223(96)00068-2 ↗
16. Influence of delamination on impact damage in composite structures10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.12.032 ↗