The Rotem failure criterion: theory and practice
Source abstract
Abstract
In part A of the exercise, the failure criterion was presented and some failure envelopes were calculated on the basis of some materials properties that were supplied by the organizers. Here, in part B, some experimental results, also supplied by the organizers, are analyzed and compared with the theoretical predictions. In some cases, there is a large deviation between theory and practice. It is shown that the huge scatter in the experimental results and the arbitrary selection of some tests and material properties might be the reason for that. It is also suggested that, in some cases, a different mode of failure that is not covered by this criterion caused the failure.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Fatigue and fracture mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (7)
Show source-provided references
1. Comp. Sci. Technol. · 1998 · 58
2. Dow NF, Rosen BW, Hashin Zvi. Studies of mechanics of filamentary composites. Tech Report NASw-1144, GEC, Philadelphia, PA, 1965.
3. A statistical distribution function of wide applicability10.1115/1.4010337 ↗
4. Soden PD, Hinton MJ, Kaddour AS. Experimental results used in the failure exercise. Comp. Sci. Technol. [in press].
5. Personal experience.
6. Failure modes of angle ply laminates10.1177/002199837500900209 ↗
7. Finite thermoelastic fracture criterion with application to laminate cracking analysis10.1016/0022-5096(95)00080-1 ↗