The importance of the mesostructure in toughening cellulosic short fibre composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In tonnage terms the commercial production of engineering composites is dominated by glass reinforced systems, this is particularly the case in the automotive industry. Natural fibres have long been regarded as a viable lightweight replacement for glass, however the various shortcomings of natural/cellulosic fibres have so far, inhibited exploitation, where resistance to fast fracture during impact is a major failing. Composite mesostructure describes mid-scale structures in composites, such as fibre alignment patterns, bundling effects, and fibre end synchronisation. The mesostructure can dramatically affect final properties in some random short fibre systems where flow is involved, such as sheet moulding compounds (SMC), and can be the determining factor in, for example, the success of one fibre system over another. This study seeks to manipulate the fibre mesostructure in moulding compounds reinforced with natural/cellulosic fibres, where it is shown that by arranging mechanically inferior fibres in bundles, composite impact energy absorption can be substantially improved, where the reasons behind the toughening mechanism at work, is discussed and optimum bundle dimensions for several fibre systems are identified. Fibre bundling seems to be a highly interesting method for toughening composites made from mechanically inferior natural/cellulosic fibres, however no work in the area has been reported until now.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Cellular and Composite Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. On the static and dynamic properties of flax and Cordenka epoxy composites10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.03.003 ↗
2. Carbon Fibers & Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastics (CFRP) – A Global Market Overview. Pub: PR Newswire; 2013.
3. Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000–201010.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.003 ↗
4. Tensile and compressive properties of flax fibres for natural fibre reinforced composites10.1023/A:1014925621252 ↗
5. Influence of dislocations and plasticity on the tensile behaviour of flax and hemp fibres10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.018 ↗
6. Skin/core micro-structure in viscose rayon fibres analysed by X-ray microbeam and electron diffraction mapping10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00433-4 ↗
7. Impact properties of natural fibre reinforced epoxy foams10.1177/0021955X9903500605 ↗
8. Biofibres, biodegradable polymers and biocomposites: An overview10.1002/(SICI)1439-2054(20000301)276:1<1::AID-MAME1>3.0.CO;2-W ↗
9. Impact and tensile properties of PLA/Cordenka and PLA/flax composites10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.01.004 ↗
10. High-tenacity man-made cellulose fibre reinforced thermoplastics – injection moulding compounds with polypropylene and alternative matrices10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.09.005 ↗
11. Newman R. Development of non-wood natural-fibre composites Chapter 5 pages 193–208 Properties and performance of Natural Fibre Composites Woodhead Publishing Ltd; 2008.10.1533/9781845694593.1.193 ↗
12. Huber T, Müssig J, Bickerton S, Staiger MP. Impact and flexural strength of rayon based all-cellulose composite laminates manufactured via solvent infusion processing. In: Jeju, Korea: 18th International Conference on Composite Materials (ICCM18), 21–26 August; 2011.
13. Satyanarayana K, Kulkarni A, Sukumaran K, Pillai S, Cherian K, Rohatgi P. Performance of banana fabric–polyester resin composites I.H. Marshall (Ed.), Composite structures. In: Proceedings of the international conference applied science, London; 1983. p. 535–48.10.1007/978-94-009-6640-6_38 ↗
14. Jute reinforced polyester composites10.1007/BF00552393 ↗
15. Coconut fibre reinforced thermosetting plastics10.1002/app.1985.070300504 ↗
16. Studies on process variables for natural fibre composites – effect of PEAP as interfacial agent10.1002/app.1988.070350412 ↗
17. Mechanical properties of pineapple leaf fibre-reinforced polyester composites10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970531)64:9<1739::AID-APP10>3.0.CO;2-T ↗
18. Effect of wettability and ageing conditions on the physical and mechanical properties of uniaxially oriented jute-roving-reinforced polyester composites10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00188-8 ↗
19. The performance of cotton/kapok fabric–polyester composites10.1016/S0142-9418(98)00017-8 ↗
20. Post-impact damage characterisation on natural fibre reinforced composites using acoustic emission10.1016/S0963-8695(01)00013-5 ↗
21. Impact and fatigue behaviour of hemp fibre composites10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.03.039 ↗
22. RTM hemp fibre-reinforced polyester composites10.1023/A:1026538107200 ↗
23. Resin transfer molding of hemp fiber composites: optimization of the process and mechanical properties of the materials10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.07.040 ↗
24. Impact properties of natural fibre composites10.1016/0010-4361(88)90596-4 ↗
25. A characterization of composites based on natural and glass fibers obtained by vacuum infusion10.1177/0021998305046450 ↗
26. Bledzki AK, Jaszkiewicz A, Murr M, Sperber VE, Reußmann T. Processing techniques for natural and wood–fibre composites. Chapter 4 pages 161–192 Properties and Performance of Natural Fibre Composites Woodhead Publishing Ltd; 2008.10.1533/9781845694593.1.163 ↗
27. Natural fibre reinforced sheet moulding compound10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00085-9 ↗
28. Huda M. Drzal LT, Ray D, Mohanty AK, Misra M. Natural-fibre composites in the automotive sector. Chapter 7 pages 221–268 Properties and Performance of Natural Fibre Composites Woodhead Publishing Ltd; 2008.10.1533/9781845694593.2.221 ↗
29. Brouwer WD. (Rik) Natural fibre composites saving wight and cost of renewable materials. Delft University, Buizerdlaan 39, Nootdorp 2633BH, The Netherlands. Phone: ++31 152 782 463; E-mail: R.Brouwer@lr.tudelft.nl; 2008.
30. Mesostructure development during moulding of sheet moulding compounds10.1002/pc.10645 ↗
31. Dennemann E et al. Fracture mechanisms in pavement design. Pretoria: s.n.; 2009.
32. Fracture of CFRP containing impregnated fibre bundles10.1016/0266-3538(93)90021-8 ↗
33. Micromechanical modelling of matrix degradation in randomly oriented discontinuous fibre composites10.1016/0266-3538(95)00096-8 ↗
34. Worrall CM, Wells GM. Fibre distribution in discontinuous fibre reinforced plastics: characterisation and effect on material performance. In: Proceedings of the seventh european conference on composite materials, vol. 1, London, 14–16 May; 1996. p. 247–52.
35. Hull · 1981
36. Burns · 1982
37. Fibre-bundling in a short-fibre composite: 1 Review of literature and development of a method for controlling the degree of bundling10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00259-2 ↗
38. Hughes M, Mott L, Hague J, Hill CAS. The toughness of vegetable fibre reinforced unsaturated polyester composites. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on woodfiber-plastic; 1999.
39. Impact properties of glass/plant fibre hybrid laminates 1310.1007/s10853-006-0662-y ↗
40. Hughes M. On the mechanical properties of bast fibre reinforced thermosetting polymer matrix composites. Ph.D Thesis. Bangor (UK): University of Wales; 2000.
41. The fracture behaviour and toughness of woven flax fibre reinforced epoxy composites10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.07.008 ↗
42. Partial replacement of E-glass fibers with flax fibers in composites and effect on falling weight impact performance10.1007/s10853-005-2882-y ↗
43. The fracture toughness of bast fibre reinforced polyester composites – Part I: evaluation and analysis10.1023/A:1020621020862 ↗
44. ASTM D 3379-75. Standard test method for tensile strength and Young’s modulus for high-modulus single-filament materials; 1989. p. 128.
45. Mechanical studies of single glass fibres recycled from hydrolysis process using sub-critical water10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.11.011 ↗