journal article·2022-12-01Open access

Remodeling of Architected Mesenchymal Microtissues Generated on Mechanical Metamaterials

Chenyan Wang, Zacharias Vangelatos, Tackla Winston, Shiyang Sun, Costas P. Grigoropoulos, Zhen Ma

Abstract

Mechanical metamaterials constitute a nascent category of architected structures comprising arranged periodic components with tailored geometrical features. These materials are now being employed as advanced medical implants due to their extraordinary mechanical properties over traditional devices. Nevertheless, to achieve desired tissue integration and regeneration, it is critical to study how the microarchitecture affects interactions between metamaterial scaffolds and living biological tissues. Based on human induced pluripotent stem cell technology and multiphoton lithography, we report the establishment of an in vitro microtissue model to study the integration and remodeling of human mesenchymal tissues on metamaterial scaffolds with different unit geometries. Microtissues showed distinct tissue morphologies and cellular behaviors between architected octet-truss and bowtie structures. Under the active force generated from mesenchymal tissues, the octet-truss and bowtie metamaterial scaffolds demonstrated unique instability phenomena, significantly different from uniform loading using conventional mechanical testing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Cellular Mechanics and Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA.

BioInspired Syracuse Institute for Material and Living Systems, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/108128652091691110.1177/1081286520916911 ↗
2. 10.1177/108128652093733910.1177/1081286520937339 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.470943610.1063/1.4709436 ↗
4. 10.1039/C8TB00576A10.1039/C8TB00576A ↗
5. 10.3390/ma1401011410.3390/ma14010114 ↗
6. 10.1039/C7MH00699C10.1039/C7MH00699C ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.00710.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.007 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsami.9b0147210.1021/acsami.9b01472 ↗
9. 10.1002/adfm.20180040510.1002/adfm.201800405 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0146810.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01468 ↗
11. 10.1002/adhm.20190121710.1002/adhm.201901217 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.12.00810.1016/j.actbio.2019.12.008 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.09.00710.1016/j.actbio.2017.09.007 ↗
14. 10.1088/0964-1726/24/5/05501310.1088/0964-1726/24/5/055013 ↗
15. 10.1002/adfm.20120266610.1002/adfm.201202666 ↗
16. 10.1002/stem.26910.1002/stem.269 ↗
17. 10.1089/ten.tea.2014.023110.1089/ten.tea.2014.0231 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.01.01010.1016/j.actbio.2016.01.010 ↗
19. 10.1039/C5RA08048G10.1039/C5RA08048G ↗
20. 10.1002/stem.224210.1002/stem.2242 ↗
21. 10.1371/journal.pone.011229110.1371/journal.pone.0112291 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.06.01910.1016/j.stemcr.2018.06.019 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b0118310.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01183 ↗
24. 10.1002/stem.273210.1002/stem.2732 ↗
25. 10.1063/5.000289810.1063/5.0002898 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00149-410.1016/S0021-9290(00)00149-4 ↗
27. 10.1073/pnas.131112011010.1073/pnas.1311120110 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41598-021-92961-y10.1038/s41598-021-92961-y ↗
29. 10.1063/5.002236710.1063/5.0022367 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.msec.2014.12.00710.1016/j.msec.2014.12.007 ↗
31. 10.1002/mame.20200023810.1002/mame.202000238 ↗
32. 10.1021/nn800451w10.1021/nn800451w ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jmps.2020.10411210.1016/j.jmps.2020.104112 ↗
34. 10.1126/science.125229110.1126/science.1252291 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.10.04810.1016/j.actbio.2015.10.048 ↗
36. 10.1039/C9BM01928F10.1039/C9BM01928F ↗
37. 10.1088/1361-665X/aaa61c10.1088/1361-665X/aaa61c ↗
38. 10.1016/S0022-5096(01)00010-210.1016/S0022-5096(01)00010-2 ↗
39. 10.1038/srep0351410.1038/srep03514 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.12.04410.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.12.044 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.02.02110.1016/j.actbio.2011.02.021 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jmps.2017.02.01110.1016/j.jmps.2017.02.011 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.03010.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.030 ↗
44. 10.1002/adma.20150280910.1002/adma.201502809 ↗
45. McKee CT Last JA Russell P Murphy CJ 2011. Indentation versus tensile measurements of Young's modulus for soft biological tissues. Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews 17 pp.155–164.10.1089/ten.teb.2010.0520 ↗
46. 10.1021/acsabm.9b0091110.1021/acsabm.9b00911 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.02.02010.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.02.020 ↗