Comparison of different failure criteria for fiber-reinforced plastics in terms of fracture curves for arbitrary stress combinations
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract For fiber-reinforced plastics exists a big number of different criteria for the failure prediction. The intention of this paper is to compare the TSAI-HIL-, the LaRC04- and PUCK’s criterion in terms of their fracture curves for a unidirectional glass-fiber reinforced composite layer. Therefore after the implementation of these three criteria, the two-dimensional fracture curves for all possible stress combinations, which can be derived from a general spatial stress tensor, are computed. In this way, the characteristics of the criteria, similarities and differences and possible weak points become obvious.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Composite Material Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. Hinton MJ, Kaddour AS, Und Soden PD. Failure criteria in fibre reinforced polymer composites: the world-wide failure exercise. A composite science and technology compendium. Elsevier, Amsterdam; 2004.10.1016/B978-008044475-8/50002-0 ↗
2. Kurnatowski B. Zweiskalensimulation von mikroheterogenen Strukturen aus spröden Faserverbundwerkstoffen. Dissertation, Universität Kassel; 2009.
3. A theory of yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic materials10.1098/rspa.1948.0045 ↗
4. Hill · 1998
5. Anisotropic strength of composites10.1007/BF02326292 ↗
6. Kober M. Ein beitrag zur strukturmechanischen Optimierung realer Bauteile in metallischer und Faserverbundbauweise unter Verwendung von wirkebenenbasierten Bruchkriterien. Dissertation, Brandenburgische Technische Universität Cottbus; 2011.
7. Mohr ChO. Welche Umstände bedingen die Elastizitätsgrenze und den Bruch eines Materials. Zeitschrift des Vereins deutscher Ingenieure, 1900;Band 24, Heft 45, S. 1524–1530, Heft 46, S:1572–7.
8. Puck A. Festigkeitsanalyse von Faser-Matrix-Laminaten. Modelle für die Praxis, Hanser Verlag, München/Wien; 1996.
9. Knops M. Analysis of failure in fiber polymer laminates: the theory of Alfred Puck. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer-Verlag; 2008.
10. Pinho ST, Dávila CG, Camanho PP, Iannucci L, Robinson P. Failure models and criteria for FRP under in-plane or three-dimensional stress states including shear non-linearity. Nasa/tm-2003-213530; 2004.
11. Constrained cracking in glass fibre-reinforced epoxy cross-ply laminates10.1007/BF00739291 ↗
12. Cuntze R, DeskaR, Szelinski B, Jeltsch-Fricker R, Meckbach S, Huybrechts D, et al. Neue Bruchkriterien und Festigkeitsnachweise für unidirektionalen Faserkunststoffverbund unter mehrachsiger Beanspruchung – Modellbildung und Experimente. Fortschrittsberichte VDI, Reihe 5, Nr. 506, Düsseldorf; 1997.
13. Maimi P, Camanho PP, Mayugo J-A, Dávila CG. A thermodynamically consistent damage model for advanced. Composites, nasa/tm-2006-214282; 2006.
14. A constitutive model for anisotropic damage in fiber-composites10.1016/0167-6636(94)00053-0 ↗