journal article·2021-05

Predicting strength of a unidirectional composite containing interface crack

Run-Sheng Mao, Zheng-Ming Huang, Zhi-Wei Wang

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, both analytical Bridging Model and numerical GMC (Generalized Method of Cells) and HFGMC (High-Fidelity Generalized Method of Cells) are applied to analyze failures of a unidirectional (UD) composite with a cracked fiber and matrix interface. Interconnecting the internal stresses in the matrix with those in the fiber by a bridging tensor, the difference between Bridging Model and GMC/HFGMC is in the bridging tensors and the method of determining them. The stress concentration factors (SCFs) of the matrix in the composite before and after the cracked interface are calculated upon the different bridging tensors. Based on the true stresses resulted from the different bridging tensors and the SCFs, off-axial tensile strengths of UD composites are predicted. A total number of 9 different prediction schemes are made. The predicted results are compared with the experimental data of carbon, aramid, and flax fiber composites prepared and measured by ourselves. It is found that the predictions based on the Bridging Model equations provide overall the best agreement with the experiments.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Enhanced interphase between epoxy matrix and carbon fiber with carbon nanotube-modified silane coating10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.05.021 ↗
2. Strength theory considering the in-situ effect of composite laminates
3. Interfacial microstructure and properties of carbon fiber composites modified with graphene oxide10.1021/am201757v ↗
4. Huang · 2018
5. Fracture properties prediction of clay/epoxy nanocomposites with interphase zones using a phase field model10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.08.002 ↗
6. Comparison of carbon nanotubes and graphene oxide coated carbon fiber for improving the interfacial properties of carbon fiber/epoxy composites10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.012 ↗
7. A cohesive interface crack model for the matrix-textile debonding in FRCM composites10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.02.019 ↗
8. Deformation behavior and crack propagation on interface of Al/Cu laminated composites in uniaxial tensile test10.1007/s12598-018-0998-x ↗
9. Interface and performance of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced PLA composites10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.032 ↗
10. Numerical analysis of the influence of a nearby fibre on the interface crack growth in composites under transverse tensile load10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.01.022 ↗
11. 3D Microstructure-based finite element modeling of deformation and fracture of SiCp/Al composites10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.11.014 ↗
12. Interface and bonding mechanisms of plant fibre composites: an overview10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.055 ↗
13. Influence of the interface strength on the mechanical properties of discontinuous tungsten fiber-reinforced tungsten composites produced by field assisted sintering technology10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.01.022 ↗
14. Interface characterization in fiber-reinforced polymer-matrix composites10.1007/s11837-016-2128-2 ↗
15. A three-phase model of the single-fiber composite fragmentation test to evaluate viscoelasticity, stress distribution and interface fracture toughness10.1080/09276440.2019.1608758 ↗
16. Modeling the molecular structure of the carbon fiber/polymer interphase for multiscale analysis of composites10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.12.008 ↗
17. Multi-scale computational analysis of unidirectional carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites under various loading conditions10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.025 ↗
18. Micromechanics of stress transfer in shape memory alloy reinforced three-phase composites10.1177/1045389X18783086 ↗
19. Robert KG, Steven MA. A Study of Influencing Factors on the Tensile Response of a Titanium Matrix Composite with Weak Interfacial Bonding. NASA/TM-2000-209798.
20. Transverse tensile and creep modeling of continuously reinforced titanium composites with local debonding10.1016/S0020-7683(01)00216-5 ↗
21. A linear elastic-brittle interface model: application for the onset and propagation of a fibre-matrix interface crack under biaxial transverse loads10.1007/s10704-015-0043-0 ↗
22. A novel interface-treated micromechanics approach for accurate and efficient modeling of CNT/polymer composites10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.140 ↗
23. Prediction of interfacial strength and failure mechanisms in particle-reinforced metal-matrix composites based on a micromechanical model10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.06.001 ↗
24. A numerical micro-mechanical study of the influence of fiber-matrix interphase failure on carbon/epoxy material properties10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.09.095 ↗
25. Evolution of interfacial debonding of a unidirectional graphite/polyimide composite under off-axis loading
26. Mechanics of interface debonding in fibre-reinforced materials10.1177/0021998315612537 ↗
27. Modeling matrix multicracking development of fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites considering fiber debonding10.1111/ijac.13068 ↗
28. Crack paralleling an interface between dissimilar materials10.1115/1.3173124 ↗
29. Simulation of the mechanical properties of fibrous composites by the bridging micromechanics model10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00142-1 ↗
30. Prediction strength of fibrous laminates under triaxial loads only upon independently measured constituent properties10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.08.010 ↗
31. On micromechanics approach to stiffness and strength of unidirectional composites10.1177/0731684418811938 ↗
32. Prediction of interfacial debonding in fiber-reinforced composite laminates10.1002/pc.24943 ↗
33. Experimental and micromechanical investigation of T300/7901 unidirectional composite strength10.1002/pc.25059 ↗
34. Stress-fields in composites reinforced by coated cylindrically orthotropic fibers10.1016/0167-6636(90)90027-D ↗
35. The tensile behavior of off-axis loaded plant fiber composites: an insight on the nonlinear stress-strain response10.1002/pc.22279 ↗
36. Modeling the off-axis tensile nonlinearity of twisted plant fiber reinforced composites fused with hierarchical angles
37. Shear deformation of a composite until failure with a debonded interface10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112797 ↗