Predicting delamination in composite structures
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The mesoscale composite damage model (MCDM) and a new component damage indicator are incorporated into a finite element code to predict the initiation and evolution of damage, and then final failure of fibrous composites structure subjected to combined loadings. The veracity of the method is demonstrated through applications to a stiffened, composite panel that is subjected to various combinations of tension, compression, shear and pressure loadings. The stiffened panel is modeled as a structure consisting of web, flange, skin and interface between the flange and the skin. Any other composite structure can be investigated at the pleasure of the investigator, subject to limitations on the computer resources required for the degree of scale desired. A component damage indicator, D x , C , is defined as the average of the damage variable x , as determined by the MCDM, for each finite element in structural component C . If varying size elements are present in the component, a weighted average is used. When D reaches a value of 1.0, the component has no stiffness and completely lacks structural integrity. Experience indicates that D > 0.4 suggests component failure. An important feature of D is that it permits damage trends in a component to be monitored. Stable damage growth corresponds to a structure with remaining integrity whereas unstable growth is a precursor to structural failure. Selected results are presented for a stiffened panel made from the carbon–epoxy material M55J/M18. It is shown that delamination is the predominate mode of failure for the cases considered and that the load level corresponding to the onset of delamination is a strong function of the type of combined loading. Failure strains are shown to vary by as much as a factor of three depending upon the type of loading.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. A damage computational method for composite structures10.1016/0045-7949(92)90226-P ↗
2. Damage development in composites with large stress gradients10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00112-9 ↗
3. Flesher ND, Herakovich CT. Damage evolution in stiffened composite structures subjected to variable loading. Applied mechanics report AM-2001-01, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 2001.
4. Griffin CF. Structural testing of the technology integration box beam. In: Proc. of the 9th DoD/NASA/FAA conference on fibrous composites in structural design. NAS 1.26:198722, 1991, p. 659–67.
5. Griffin CF, Meade LE. Design, analysis and fabrication of the technology integration box beam. In: Proc. of the 1st NASA advanced composites technology conference. NAS 1.55:3104-PT-1, vol. 1. 1991, p. 157–78.
6. Shuart MJ, Ambur DR, Davis Jr DD, Davis RC, Farley GL, Lotts CG, Wang JT. Technology integration box beam failure study. In: Proc. of the third NASA advanced composites technology conference. NAS 1.55:3178/V.1/PT.1, vol. 1, No. 2, 1993, p. 951–65.
7. Davis DD, Farley GL, Ambur DR, Davis RC, Shuart MJ, Wang JT, Lotts CG. An analytically designed subcomponent test to reproduce the failure of a composite wing box bean. AIAA paper 93-1344, 1993, p. 424–35.
8. Ambur DR, Starnes JH, Dávila CG, Phillips EA. Response of composite panels with stiffness gradients due to stiffener terminations and cutouts. NAS 1.15.112845, AIAA paper 97-1368, 1997, 14 p.10.2514/6.1997-1368 ↗
9. Ladevèze P. Sur une théorie de l’endommangement anisotrope. Rapport Interne no. 34 (French), Laboratoire de Mécanique et Technologie, Cachan, Fr, 1983.
10. Herakovich · 1998
11. Interlaminar interface modeling10.1016/0263-8223(92)90060-P ↗
12. Damage mechanics of interfacial media: basic aspects, identification, and application to delamination
13. Interlaminar interface model identification and forecast of delamination in composite laminates10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00144-9 ↗
14. Modeling and computation until final fracture of laminated composites
15. Delayed-damage modelling for fracture prediction of laminated composites under dynamic loading
16. Allix O, Deü J-F, Ladevèze P.A delay-damage meso-model. In: Proc. of the ECCM ’99, Munich, Germany, 1999, 19 pp.
17. HKS. ABAQUS, v 5.8, 1998.
18. MSC. PATRAN. v.8.5, 1999.