journal article·2020-03

When does nanotube grafting on fibers benefit the strength and toughness of composites?

Qiang Liu, Stepan V. Lomov, Larissa Gorbatikh

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The answer to this question is revealed by our dual scale models, which say that the composite is the strongest and the toughest not when nanotubes themselves absorb energy but when they serve a supporting role in facilitating matrix to do the energy absorption instead. Toughening by means of only nanotube debonding/pull-out is not the most optimal strategy. The model concurrently considers five energy absorbing mechanisms acting at different scales. These mechanisms are nanotube debonding from the matrix, nanotube breakage, nanotube detachment from the (microscopic) fiber, fiber debonding and finally microdamage in the matrix. Our virtual experiments show that the benefit of CNT grafting largely depends on the tensile strength of CNTs and their interfacial cohesion with the matrix. A map of failure modes is constructed in the parametric space of these two CNT properties to help establish a window of properties beneficial for the strength and toughness improvement. The maximal enhancement is obtained when matrix is allowed to absorb energy through micro-scale damage and CNT debonding at the nano-scale has only partial contribution to it. Recommendations for the CNT tensile strength and CNT/matrix interfacial strength, necessary for creation of strong and tough hierarchical composites, are formulated.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Graphene research and applications · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Structural biological materials: critical mechanics-materials connections10.1126/science.1220854 ↗
2. Bioinspired structural materials10.1038/nmat4089 ↗
3. Multi-scale interlaminar fracture mechanisms in woven composite laminates reinforced with aligned carbon nanotubes10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.06.003 ↗
4. Grafting carbon nanotubes onto carbon fibres doubles their effective strength and the toughness of the composite10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.03.015 ↗
5. Tailoring carbon nanotube/matrix interface to optimize mechanical properties of multiscale composites10.1016/j.carbon.2013.12.005 ↗
6. Carbon nanotube-grafted carbon fiber polymer composites: damage characterization on the micro-scale10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.06.004 ↗
7. Carbon nanotube-based hierarchical composites: a review10.1039/c000041h ↗
8. Increasing the interfacial strength in carbon fiber/epoxy composites by controlling the orientation and length of carbon nanotubes grown on the fibers10.1016/j.carbon.2011.06.064 ↗
9. Comparison of different surface treatments of carbon fibers used as reinforcements in epoxy composites: interfacial strength measurements by in-situ scanning electron microscope tensile tests10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.08.018 ↗
10. Effects of grafting strength and density on interfacial shear strength of carbon nanotube grafted carbon fibre reinforced composites10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.09.025 ↗
11. Enhancement of fracture toughness of hierarchical carbon fiber composites via improved adhesion between carbon nanotubes and carbon fibers10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.12.014 ↗
12. Functionalized multiwall carbon nanotubes strengthened GRP hybrid composites: improved properties with optimum fiber content10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.06.012 ↗
13. The organization of the osteocyte network mirrors the extracellular matrix orientation in bone10.1016/j.jsb.2010.11.014 ↗
14. Strain mapping at the micro-scale in hierarchical polymer composites with aligned carbon nanotube grafted fibers10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.10.021 ↗
15. Toughening mechanisms in polymer nanocomposites: from experiments to modelling10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.11.027 ↗
16. Hierarchical lightweight composite materials for structural applications10.1557/mrs.2016.170 ↗
17. Interface mechanics of carbon fibers with radially-grown carbon nanotubes10.1016/j.carbon.2018.03.090 ↗
18. Atomistically derived cohesive behavior of interphases in carbon fiber reinforced CNT nanocomposites10.1016/j.carbon.2017.02.068 ↗
19. Effective properties of a novel composite reinforced with short carbon fibers and radially aligned carbon nanotubes10.1016/j.mechmat.2012.05.008 ↗
20. Micromechanical analysis of carbon nanotube-coated fiber-reinforced hybrid composites
21. Atomistically informed multiscale modeling of radially grown nanocomposite using a continuum damage mechanics approach10.1016/j.carbon.2018.10.051 ↗
22. Modelling evidence of stress concentration mitigation at the micro-scale in polymer composites by the addition of carbon nanotubes10.1016/j.carbon.2014.10.061 ↗
23. Can carbon nanotubes grown on fibers fundamentally change stress distribution in a composite?10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.03.021 ↗
24. Inter-fiber stresses in composites with carbon nanotube grafted and coated fibers10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.04.013 ↗
25. Stress magnification due to carbon nanotube agglomeration in composites10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.069 ↗
26. Multifidelity multiscale modeling of nanocomposites for microstructure and macroscale analysis10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.075 ↗
27. The interplay between multiple toughening mechanisms in nanocomposites with spatially distributed and oriented carbon nanotubes as revealed by dual-scale simulations10.1016/j.carbon.2018.10.005 ↗
28. A combined use of embedded and cohesive elements to model damage development in fibrous composites10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.110921 ↗
29. Reduction of the volume redundancy in combined embedded elements/cohesive zone modelling–Comments on the paper: Liu Q, Gorbatikh L, Lomov SV. A combined use of embedded and cohesive elements to model damage development in fibrous composites10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.110921 ↗
30. Micromechanical analysis of polymer composites reinforced by unidirectional fibres: Part I–Constitutive modelling10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.02.009 ↗
31. Failure behavior of an epoxy matrix under different kinds of static loading10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00057-4 ↗
32. Spatial distribution and orientation of nanotubes for suppression of stress concentrations optimized using genetic algorithm and finite element analysis10.1016/j.matdes.2018.08.019 ↗
33. Strength and breaking mechanism of multiwalled carbon nanotubes under tensile load10.1126/science.287.5453.637 ↗
34. Fracture transitions at a carbon-nanotube/polymer interface10.1002/adma.200501033 ↗
35. Direct mechanical measurement of the tensile strength and elastic modulus of multiwalled carbon nanotubes10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01807-X ↗
36. Grafting carbon nanotubes directly onto carbon fibers for superior mechanical stability: towards next generation aerospace composites and energy storage applications10.1016/j.carbon.2015.10.002 ↗
37. The role of grafting force and surface wettability in interfacial enhancement of carbon nanotube/carbon fiber hierarchical composites10.1016/j.carbon.2013.12.020 ↗
38. Detachment of nanotubes from a polymer matrix10.1063/1.1521585 ↗
39. Quantitative nanomechanical characterization of the van der Waals interfaces between carbon nanotubes and epoxy10.1016/j.carbon.2014.10.065 ↗
40. Interface toughness of carbon nanotube reinforced epoxy composites10.1021/am1011047 ↗
41. Optimal synergy between micro and nano scale: hierarchical all carbon composite fibers for enhanced stiffness, interfacial shear strength and Raman strain sensing10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.07.003 ↗