Energy methods for fatigue damage modelling of laminates
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The initiation and growth of damage in composite materials are phenomena that precede the catastrophic failure event where a material sample or component fragments or separates into two pieces. During fatigue loading, the damage grows stably due to cyclic stressing and leads to a gradual deterioration of mechanical properties and ultimately to failure. For cross-ply laminates, the estimation is necessary of effective stress intensity factors or energy release rates, for statically loaded ply cracks in 90° plies that are bridged by the uncracked 0° plies, particularly when considering the early stages of property degradation. Such relations are used in conjunction with a fatigue crack growth law to predict the progressive development of damage during fatigue. For fatigue loading this paper justifies, on the basis of detailed physical modelling based on energy methods rather than empiricism, the use of the stress range intensity factor as the correlating parameter for fatigue crack growth data, rather than energy release rates or differences of energy release rate. Use is made of an accurate stress transfer model for multiple-ply cross-ply laminates to predict the dependence of energy release rates and stress intensity factors for long bridged ply cracks on the applied stress and ply crack separation. Two methods of analysis are considered. The first uses a method that can be extended to deal with small laminate defects where the energy release rate and stress intensity factor depend on the size of the defect, but the laminate is subject only to a uniaxial load. The second method applies to multi-axial loading, but assumes that the stress intensity factor or energy release rate is independent of the defect size. Both methods are, however, shown to lead to the same energy release rate and stress intensity factor for long ply cracks subject to uniaxial loading. The two methods also take full account of the effects of thermal residual stresses through the use of a crack closure concept. Simplifying assumptions are made when developing a model that predicts the degradation of most of the thermoelastic constants of a fatigue damaged cross-ply laminate as a function of the number of fatigue cycles. Such data are needed to predict the fatigue behaviour of structures having complex stress states using finite element analysis. Preliminary work carried out to validate the fatigue model, based on simplifying assumptions, has led to pessimistic predictions of performance that have the advantage that they can be exploited in the form of conservative design methods.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Fire effects on concrete materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 2003
2. Fatigue of composite materials: damage mechanisms and fatigue life diagrams10.1098/rspa.1981.0163 ↗
3. Talreja · 1987
4. A stress intensity factor approach to fatigue growth of transverse ply cracks10.1016/0266-3538(85)90060-0 ↗
5. Strain energy release rates and the fatigue growth of matrix cracks in model arrays in composite laminates10.1098/rspa.1991.0024 ↗
6. A historical review of the fatigue behaviour of fibre-reinforced plastics
7. Physical modelling of damage development in structural composite materials under stress
8. Delamination fatigue
9. A computational mesodamage model for life prediction for laminates
10. Analysis of matrix crack induced delamination in composite laminates under static and fatigue loading
11. McCartney LN. Model of composite degradation due to environmentally assisted fatigue damage, NPL Report MATC(A)26, May 2001.
12. Mechanics for the growth of bridged cracks in composite materials: I – basic principles10.1520/CTR10091J ↗
13. Mechanics for the growth of bridged cracks in composite materials: II – applications10.1520/CTR10092J ↗
14. McCartney LN. Stress transfer mechanics: models that should be the basis of life prediction methodology, ASTM STP 1253 on Life Prediction Methodology for Titanium Matrix Composites, 1996, p. 85–113.10.1520/STP18220S ↗
15. Mechanics and mechanisms of fatigue crack growth
16. Predicting transverse crack formation in cross-ply laminates10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00142-X ↗
17. McCartney LN. Physically based damage models for laminated composites, Proc Instn Mech Engrs 2003, 217, Part L: J. Materials: Design and Applications, p. 163–99.10.1243/146442003322256187 ↗
18. Dugdale · J Mech Phys Solids · 1960 · 8 · 10010.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2 ↗
19. Derivation of crack growth laws for linear viscoelastic solids based upon the concept of a fracture process zone10.1007/BF00018241 ↗
20. Crack growth predictions for viscoelastic materials exhibiting non-uniform craze deformation10.1007/BF00032534 ↗
21. McCartney LN. Interaction of transverse cracks of finite size in a cross-ply laminate. Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Composite Material, vol. 1. Whistler, Canada, August 1995. p. 399–406.
22. Model to predict effects of triaxial loading on ply cracking in general symmetric laminates10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00086-5 ↗
23. Software system ‘PREDICT’ which is a specific module of CoDA (see ).
24. Broughton WR, Lodeiro MJ. Fatigue testing of composite laminates, NPL Report CMMT(A)252, November 2000.
25. The initiation and growth of delaminations induced by matrix microcracks in laminated composites10.1007/BF00013005 ↗
26. The effect of periodic–random loading on fatigue crack growth10.1007/BF00036985 ↗
27. A theoretical explanation of the delaying effects of overloads on fatigue crack propagation10.1007/BF00032546 ↗
28. Soden PD, Hinton MJ, Kaddour AS. Lamina properties, lay-up configurations and loading conditions for a range of fibre reinforced composite laminates, Comp Sci Tech 1998;58(7):1011–22, and other papers in the same special issue. Part B of the exercise is published in Comp Sci Tech 2002;62(12 and 13) and Part C is published in Comp Sci Tech 2004;64(3 and 4).