Fracture characterization of sandwich structures interfaces under mode I loading
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The accurate prediction of failure of sandwich structures using cohesive mixed-mode damage models depends on the accurate characterization of the cohesive laws under pure mode loading. In this work, a numerical and experimental study on the asymmetric double cantilever beam (DCB) sandwich specimen is presented with the objective to characterize the debonding fracture between the face sheet and the core under pure mode I. A data reduction method based on beam theory was formulated in such a way to incorporate the complex damaging phenomena of the debonding due to the material and geometric asymmetry of the specimen, via the consideration of an equivalent crack length (ae). Experimental DCB tests were performed and the proposed methodology was followed to obtain the debonding fracture energy (GIc). The experimental tests were numerically simulated and a cohesive damage model was employed to reproduce crack propagation. An inverse method was followed to obtain the local cohesive strength (σu,I) based on the fitting of the numerical and experimental load–displacement curves. With the value of fracture energy and cohesive strength defined, the cohesive law for interface mode I fracture is characterized. Good agreement between the numerical and the experimental R-curves validates the accuracy of the proposed data reduction procedure.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Zenkert D. The handbook of sandwich construction. EMAS: UK; 1997.
2. Non-uniform compressive strength of debonded sandwich panels-II. Fracture mechanics investigation10.1177/1099636205054790 ↗
3. Experimental study of debonded sandwich panels under compressive loading10.1177/1099636206054996 ↗
4. Luundsgaard-Larsen C, Berggreen C, Nokkenvend A. Residual strength of in-plane loaded debonded sandwich panels-Experimental investigation. Sandwich Structures 7: advancing with Sandw Struct Mater. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on sandwich structures, Aalborg, 29–31 August 2005, Springer Netherlands; 2005. p. 451–60.10.1007/1-4020-3848-8_45 ↗
5. Cohesive and continuum mixed-mode damage models applied to the simulation of the mechanical behaviour of bonded joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.04.004 ↗
6. Analysis of crack propagation in double cantilever beam tests of multidirectional laminates10.1016/S0167-6636(02)00289-2 ↗
7. Modelling single and double-lap repairs on composite materials10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.007 ↗
8. Using a cohesive damage model to predict the tensile behaviour of CFRP single-strap repairs10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.10.003 ↗
9. Modelling the tensile fracture behaviour of CFRP scarf repairs10.1016/j.compositesb.2008.10.008 ↗
10. Delamination buckling and propagation analysis of honeycomb panels using a cohesive element approachi10.1023/A:1016333709040 ↗
11. Performance of a cohesive layer model in the prediction of interfacial crack growth in sandwich beams10.1177/1099636202004001029 ↗
12. Cohesive layer models for predicting delamination growth and crack kinking in sandwich structures10.1023/A:1020930120390 ↗
13. Ramantani DA, Campilho RDSG, de Moura MFSF, Marques AT. Stress and failure analysis of repaired sandwich composite beams using a cohesive damage model. J Sandw Struct Mater. doi: 10.1177/1099636208104520.
14. Analysis of the DCB sandwich for debond characterization10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.03.045 ↗
15. Crack path in foam cored DCB sandwich fracture specimens10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.013 ↗
16. The tilted sandwich debond (TSD) specimen for face/core interface fracture characterization10.1177/109963629900100104 ↗
17. Elastic foundation analysis of tilted sandwich debond (TSD) specimen10.1177/109963620000200101 ↗
18. Fracture mechanics analysis of tilted sandwich debond (TSD) specimen10.1177/002199801772661399 ↗
19. Mode mixity and crack tip yield zones in TSD sandwich specimens with PVC foam core10.1177/1099636202004002703 ↗
20. Influences of foam density and core thickness on debond toughness of sandwich specimens with PVC foam core10.1177/1099636203005002020 ↗
21. A test technique for assessing core-skin adhesion in composite sandwich structures10.1007/BF00278162 ↗
22. In situ fracture toughness testing of core materials in sandwich panels10.1177/0021998304042392 ↗
23. Interfacial fracture in sandwich laminates10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00065-2 ↗
24. Experimental investigation of compression moulding of Glass/PA12-PMI foam core sandwich components10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00028-7 ↗
25. Beam analysis of angle-ply laminate DCB specimens10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00069-4 ↗
26. An evaluation of data reduction methods for opening mode fracture toughness of sandwich structures10.1177/1099636205047085 ↗
27. Fracture and fatigue tests and analysis of composite sandwich structure10.1177/0021998305050432 ↗
28. Allen · 1969
29. Numerical simulation of the ENF test for the mode II fracture characterization of bonded joints10.1163/156856106775212422 ↗
30. Mode mixity and crack tip yield zones in TSD sandwich specimens with PVC foam core10.1177/1099636202004002703 ↗
31. Theoretical and experimental studies for the failure criterion of adhesively bonded joints10.1163/15685610051066730 ↗
32. Joint strength optimization of adhesively bonded patches10.1080/00218460802505275 ↗
33. Modelling compression failure after low velocity impact on laminated composites using interface elements10.1177/002199839703101501 ↗
34. Interface element including point-to-surface constraints for three dimensional problems with damage propagation10.1108/02644400010308053 ↗