Low-energy impact effects on candidate automotive structural composites
Source abstract
Abstract
The objective of the work described in this paper was to experimentally characterize the susceptibility of three candidate automotive structural composites to incidental, low-energy impact damage. The composites, each of which had the same urethane matrix, were produced by a rapid molding process suitable for high-volume automotive applications. The reinforcement for the first composite was a random chopped-glass fiber, while the remaining two were reinforced with stitch-bonded carbon-fiber mats, one in a crossply layup, and the other in a quasi-isotropic layup. A pendulum device, representative of events such as tool drops, and a gas-gun projectile, representative of events such as kickups of roadway debris, were used to impact plate specimens. Brick-drop tests were also performed to assess the applicability of the baseline pendulum and gas-gun data to other events. Following the impacts, the damage areas were measured and the plates were cut into either tensile, standard compressive, or compression-after-impact specimens for determining strength degradation. The glass-fiber composite was least susceptible to damage, followed by the crossply carbon-fiber laminate, which had the same thickness. The quasi-isotropic carbon-fiber composite, which was thinner than the other two, sustained the most damage. While compressive strength was significantly degraded by moderate damage in the random-glass-fiber composite, tensile strength was not. On the other hand, both tensile and compressive strengths were degraded in the crossply carbon-fiber laminate (only compressive strength loss was measured in the quasi-isotropic laminate). Compressive strength degradation for a given damage area was similar in the two carbon-fiber laminates. Both showed lesser degradation than did the glass-fiber composite. For the quasi-isotropic carbon-fiber laminate, it was shown that strength degradation produced by an open circular hole provides a reasonable lower bound to the degradation due to an impact damage area of the same size.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Transportation Safety and Impact Analysis · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Abrate · 1998
2. Corum JM, et al. Durability-based design criteria for a chopped-glass-fiber automotive structural composite. Report ORNL/TM-1999-182, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, November 1999.
3. Durability-based design criteria for a chopped-glass-fiber automotive structural composite10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00242-6 ↗
4. Corum JM, et al. Durability-based design properties of reference crossply carbon-fiber composite. Report ORNL/TM-2000/322, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, April 2001.10.2172/779794 ↗
5. Corum JM, et al. Durability-based design criteria for a quasi-isotropic carbon-fiber automotive composite. Report ORNL/TM-2002/39, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, March 2002.10.2172/814041 ↗
6. Charka NG, Dahl JS. P4: glass fiber preforming technology for automotive applications. 4th International SAMPE Symposium, May 1999, pp. 281–92.
7. Corum JM, et al. Durability-based design criteria for an automotive structural composite: Part 2. Background data and models. Report ORNL-8931, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, February 1998.10.2172/16716 ↗
8. Corum JM, Battiste RL. Damage tolerance design procedures for an automotive composite. Conference Proceedings, The 13th Annual ESD Advanced Composites Conference & Exposition, Detroit, Michigan, September, 1998 (CD-ROM).10.2172/676890 ↗
9. Poe CC, Jr. Relevance of impactor shape to nonvisible damage and residual tensile strength of a thick graphite/epoxy laminate. Composite Materials: Fatigue and Fracture, ASTM STP 1110, American Society for Testing and Materials 1991, pp. 501–26.10.1520/STP17734S ↗
10. Sjöblom P, Hwang B. Compression-after-impact: the $5000 data point. 34th International SAMPE Symposium, May 1989, pp. 1411–21.
11. Avery WB, Grande DH. Influence of materials and layup parameters on impact damage mechanisms. 22nd International SAMPE Technical Conference, November 1990, pp. 470–483.
12. Cairns DS, Lagace PA. Residual tensile strength of graphite/epoxy and Kevlar/epoxy laminates with impact damage. Composite Materials: Testing and Design (9th volume), ASTM STP 1059, American Society for Testing Materials 1990 pp. 48–63.10.1520/STP24107S ↗
13. Cantrell WJ, Morton J. Low velocity impact damage in carbon fibre reinforced plastic laminates. Proceedings of V International Congress on Experimental Mechanics, June 1984, Montreal, Canada, pp. 314–19.
14. Comparison of the low and high velocity impact response of CFRP10.1016/0010-4361(89)90913-0 ↗
15. A model for predicting damage in graphite/epoxy laminated composites resulting from low-velocity point impact10.1177/002199839202601408 ↗
16. On the impact performance of carbon fibre laminates with epoxy and PEEK matrices10.1016/0266-3538(85)90019-3 ↗
17. On the prediction of tensile strength after impact of composite laminates10.1520/CTR10191J ↗
18. Low velocity transverse impact behavior of 8-ply, graphite-epoxy laminates10.1177/073168448300200401 ↗
19. Delamination damage in central impacts at subperforation speeds on laminated Kevlar/epoxy plates
20. Low-velocity impact damage on thick-section graphite/epoxy laminated plates10.1177/073168449301201203 ↗
21. The role of impact damage in post-impact compression testing10.1016/0010-4361(90)90423-T ↗
22. Low-velocity impact damage in graphite-fiber reinforced epoxy laminates10.1002/pc.750020108 ↗
23. Willams JG, Rhodes MD. Effect of resin on impact damage tolerance of graphite/epoxy laminates. Composite Materials: Testing and Design (Sixth Conference), ASTM STP 787, American Society for Testing Materials 1982, pp. 450–80.10.1520/STP28495S ↗