journal article·2006-02

Micromechanical modeling of composites with mechanical interface – Part II: Damage mechanics assessment

Nicola Bonora, Andrew Ruggiero

Composites Science and Technology· Volume 66· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Continuing the work initiated in the Part I [Bonora N, Ruggiero A. Micromechanical modeling of composites with mechanical interface – Part I: unit cell model development and manufacturing process effects. Compos Sci Technol 2003], in this paper the possibility to account for different damage mechanisms, in the unit cell model (UCM), explicitly developed for composites with mechanical interface, is discussed and results for Ti-15-3/SCS-6 composite laminates are presented. Starting from the analysis of the constituent behaviors a probabilistic model based on Weibull statistics is developed for fiber failure, while a ductile damage model which incorporates stress triaxiality effect has been used for predicting metal matrix progressive failure. Fiber–matrix debonding process has been naturally predicted incorporating the material manufacturing process in the stress/strain history. Numerical results performed with the UCM applied to 0° and 90° unidirectional laminates, loaded both in tension and compression, have been compared with experimental results at both macro- and microscopic scale.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Material Mechanics · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. The elastic moduli of fiber-reinforced materials10.1115/1.3629590 ↗
2. A variational approach to the theory of elastic behaviour of multiphase materials10.1016/0022-5096(63)90060-7 ↗
3. Micromechanical analysis of composite by the method of cells10.1115/1.3152428 ↗
4. A unified periodical boundary conditions for representative volume elements of composites and applications10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00024-6 ↗
5. Micromechanical modeling of composites with mechanical interface – Part I: unit cell model development and manufacturing process effects10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.041 ↗
6. Conceptual framework for interpretation of MMC fatigue10.1016/0921-5093(95)07001-X ↗
7. Theory of mechanical properties of ceramic–matrix composites10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb06852.x ↗
8. Strength distributions and size effects for 2D and 3D composites with Weibull fibers in an elastic matrix10.1023/A:1015729607223 ↗
9. A local approach to fracture10.1016/0029-5493(87)90230-5 ↗
10. On the dependence of the Weibull exponent on geometry and loading conditions and its implications on fracture toughness probability curve using a local approach criterion10.1023/A:1007680819217 ↗
11. Tough-to-brittle transition in ceramic–matrix composites with increasing interfacial shear stress10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00291-3 ↗
12. Dutton · J Am Ceram Soc · 2000 · 83 · 16610.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01166.x ↗
13. Brust FW, Newaz GM, Majumdar BS. In: ASTM spring symposium; 1992.
14. Numerical modeling of damage evolution and viscoplasticity in metal matrix composites10.1016/0045-7825(95)00810-N ↗
15. Effect of fibre debonding in a whisker-reinforced metal10.1016/0921-5093(90)90170-8 ↗
16. Parametric study of contact stress around spherical and cylindrical inclusions10.1016/S0927-0256(02)00255-0 ↗
17. Micro-mechanics of off-axis loading of metal matrix composites using finite element analysis10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00248-1 ↗
18. Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth: Part I – yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media10.1115/1.3443401 ↗
19. Rousselier G. Les Modèles de Rupture Ductile et leurs Possibilité Actuelles dans le Cadre de l’Approche Locale, EDF. Service Réacteurs Nucléaires et Echangeurs, Les Renardières, BP1, F-77250, Moret-Sur-Loing, France; 1986.
20. Lemaitre · 1992
21. A nonlinear CDM model for ductile failure10.1016/S0013-7944(97)00074-X ↗
22. Compressive behavior of a titanium metal matrix composite with a circular hole10.1016/0263-8223(95)00094-1 ↗
23. Majumdar BS, Newaz GM. Inelastic deformation of metal matrix composites. part I – plasticity and damage mechanisms. NASA Report CR-189095, NASA Lewis Research Center, Contract NAS3-26053, March; 1992.
24. Micro-damage effect on the overall response of long fiber/metal matrix composites10.1016/0010-4361(94)90187-2 ↗
25. MSC. Marc. Theory and user information, vol. A, version 2003.
26. Ductile damage evolution under triaxial state of stress: theory and experiments10.1016/j.ijplas.2004.06.003 ↗