journal article·2006-02

Micromechanical modeling of composites with mechanical interface – Part 1: Unit cell model development and manufacturing process effects

Nicola Bonora, Andrew Ruggiero

Composites Science and Technology· Volume 66· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Micromechanical modeling has been demonstrated to be a powerful tool to predict macroscopic constitutive response especially for those materials having periodic microstructure. In the past decades, this methodology has been widely applied to composites often neglecting the role of stress/strain histories due to manufacturing. In this first paper, looking at those classes of composite materials having a mechanical interface, the need and the importance of modeling the matrix–reinforcement assembly process is analyzed in details. Even though some pioneering works have been done in this area in the late 1980s, today the possibility to employ advanced contact algorithms and to incorporate material temperature dependency as well as damage open new possibilities for obtaining reliable, accurate and scalable solutions not only limited to the elastic range. Here, an extensive analysis of the problems related to the development of the unit cell model for MMC is presented and used to predict the macroscopic response of SiC/Ti-15-3 unidirectional composite laminates.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Composite Material Mechanics · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Finite element micromechanical analysis of a unidirectional composite including longitudinal shear loading
2. Convergence rates for computational predictions of stiffness loss in metal matrix composites
3. A variational approach to the theory of elastic behaviour of multiphase materials10.1016/0022-5096(63)90060-7 ↗
4. The elastic moduli of fiber-reinforced materials10.1115/1.3629590 ↗
5. Micromechanical analysis of composite by the method of cells10.1115/1.3152428 ↗
6. Prediction of composite properties from a representative volume element10.1016/0266-3538(95)00141-7 ↗
7. Bonora N, Ruggiero A. Micromechanical modeling of composites with mechanical interface – Part II: damage mechanics assessment, Compos Sci Technol, (submitted).10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.043 ↗
8. A unified periodical boundary conditions for representative volume elements of composites and applications10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00024-6 ↗
9. Kuna M, Sun DA. Analysis and void growth and coalescence in cast iron by cell models. Local Approach to Fracture 1996 Fontainebleau, France 86–96.
10. Majumdar BS, Newaz GM. Isothermal fatigue mechanisms in ti-based metal matrix composites. NASA Report 191181, Contact NAS3-26494, September 1993.
11. Microstructure of a composite SiC/Ti-15-3 composites10.1016/0010-4361(90)90236-P ↗
12. Brust FW, Newaz GM, Majumdar BS. ASTM spring symposium, 1992.
13. Thermal cycling response of quasi-isotropic metal matrix composites10.1115/1.2904155 ↗
14. Micro-damage effect on the overall response of long fiber/metal matrix composites10.1016/0010-4361(94)90187-2 ↗
15. Majumdar BS, Newaz GM. Inelastic deformation of metal matrix composites. part I – plasticity and damage mechanisms, NASA Report CR-189095, NASA Lewis Research Center, Contract NAS3-26053, March, 1992.
16. The effects of uneven fiber spacing on thermal residual stresses in a unidirectional SCS-6/Ti-15-3 laminate
17. The transverse creep and tensile behavior of SCS-6/Ti–6Al–4V metal matrix composites at 482°C10.1080/10759419408945821 ↗
18. Modeling of anisotropic behavior of weakly bonded fiber reinforced MMCs10.1016/0956-7151(93)90045-T ↗
19. Clyne · 1993
20. Bounds on overall instantaneous properties of elastic–plastic composites10.1016/0022-5096(88)90019-1 ↗