Cyclic deformation behavior of in situ aluminum–matrix composites of the system Al–Al3Ti–TiB2–Al2O3
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Aluminum-based composites reinforced with in situ ceramic TiB2 and Al2O3 particulates as well as intermetallic Al3Ti phase were prepared through reactive hot pressing of powders from the Al–TiO2–B2O3 and Al–TiO2–B systems. In situ composite derived from the Al–TiO2–B2O3 system exhibited lower yield and tensile strengths but higher tensile ductility due to its lower Al3Ti content. The low cycle fatigue behavior of in situ composites prepared from such systems under total strain-controlled conditions at room temperature was investigated. At low strain amplitudes, stable cyclic response was observed in the in situ composites fabricated from the Al–TiO2–B2O3 and Al–TiO2–B systems. However, initial cyclic hardening followed by softening occurred in the composite prepared from Al–TiO2–B2O3 system. The fatigue damage was observed to initiate in brittle Al3Ti blocks. Thus composite fabricated from Al–TiO2–B2O3 system had longer fatigue lives. The fatigue life data of in situ composites can be described by the Coffin–Manson relationship.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · MXene and MAX Phase Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Shackelford · 2001
2. In situ ceramic particle-reinforced aluminum–matrix composites fabricated by reaction pressing in the TiO2(Ti)–A–B–B2O3 systems10.1007/s11661-997-0123-5 ↗
3. Microstructural and mechanical characteristics of in situ metal–matrix composites10.1016/S0927-796X(00)00024-3 ↗
4. Mechanical properties of some PM aluminide and silicide reinforced 2124 aluminum–matrix composites10.1016/S1359-6462(02)00095-7 ↗
5. Thermal stability of an Al/Ni3Al composite processed by powder metallurgy10.1016/S0966-9795(97)00027-7 ↗
6. Fracture analysis of aluminum–matrix composite materials reinforced with (Ni3Al)p10.1023/A:1021884001846 ↗
7. Evolution and microstructure and hardening, and the role of Al3Ti coarsening, during extended thermal treatment in mechanically alloyed Al–Ti–O based materials10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00016-7 ↗
8. Elastic constants of TiAl3 and ZrAl3 single crystals10.1007/BF00549190 ↗
9. Mechanical activation of the solid state reaction between Al and TiO210.1016/S0921-5093(98)00770-9 ↗
10. Evaluation of the microstructure of in situ reaction between Al3Ti–Al2O3–Al composite10.1016/S1359-6462(97)00073-0 ↗
11. Property–microstructure correlation in in situ formed Al2O3, TiB2and Al3Ti mixture-reinforced aluminum composites10.1007/BF00367894 ↗
12. Thermal stability and its effects on the mechanical properties of rapidly solidified Al–Ti alloys10.1016/S0921-5093(00)00886-8 ↗
13. Microstructural and chemical characterization of Al3Ti alloy obtained with a rapid solidification technique10.1016/S0254-0584(98)00190-4 ↗
14. Grain growth and recrystallization of nanocrystalline Al3Ti prepared by mechanical alloying10.1023/A:1021870530302 ↗
15. Influence of silicon carbide on quasi static and cyclic fatigue fracture behavior of 6061 aluminum alloy composites10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01444-7 ↗
16. Fatigue behavior of a 2xxx series aluminum alloy reinforced with 15 vol pct SiCp10.1007/BF02661094 ↗
17. Effect of microstructure on the cyclic response and fatigue behavior of an aluminum metal–matrix composite10.1016/0956-716X(91)90038-3 ↗
18. Low cycle fatigue behavior of particulate reinforced metal–matrix composites10.1023/A:1004720300774 ↗
19. Low cycle fatigue behavior of a SiCp reinforced aluminum–matrix composite at ambient and elevated temperature10.1016/0956-716X(95)00006-H ↗
20. Effect of reinforcement size on low cycle fatigue behavior of SiC particle reinforced aluminum–matrix composites10.1016/0956-716X(95)00281-Y ↗
21. Influence of reinforcement fracture on the cyclic stress–strain curve of metal–matrix composites10.1016/0956-7151(95)00096-E ↗
22. In situ stir cast Al–TiB2composite: processing and mechanical properties10.1179/026708301101509863 ↗
23. L12 Al3Ti-based alloys with Al2Ti precipitates – 1. Structure and stability of the precipitates10.1016/0956-7151(94)90505-3 ↗
24. L12 Al3Ti-based alloys with Al2Ti precipitated – II. Deformation behavior of single crystals10.1016/0956-7151(94)90506-1 ↗
25. The quasi-static and cyclic fatigue fracture behavior of 2014 aluminum alloy metal–matrix composites10.1007/s11661-000-1014-1 ↗
26. Effect of dislocation substructures on fatigue fracture10.1007/BF02661566 ↗
27. Low energy dislocation structures produced by cyclic deformation10.1016/0025-5416(86)90281-8 ↗
28. A study of dislocation structure in polycrystalline copper during low cycle fatigue at low strain amplitudes10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00312-X ↗
29. Plastic–strain cyclic response of SiC particulate reinforced aluminum composites10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00012-6 ↗
30. Low-cycle fatigue of dispersion strengthened copper10.1007/BF02652324 ↗
31. Fatigue damage evolution in a particulate-reinforced metal–matrix composite determined by acoustic emission and compliance method10.3139/146.020719 ↗
32. Influence of reinforcement morphology and matrix strength of metal–matrix composites on the cyclic deformation and fatigue behavior10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00075-5 ↗
33. The low cycle fatigue behavior of an aluminum–alloy–ceramic–particle composite10.1016/0142-1123(92)90371-I ↗