Finite element evaluation of the microbond test: meniscus effect, interphase region, and vise angle
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract An axisymmetric finite element model (FEM) was used to determine the stresses that develop during a microbond test of a glass fiber/polymer matrix composite system. The complete bead shape including the meniscus that occurs as the bead wets to the fiber was included in the FEM to determine the influence of the bead geometry on the resulting stresses. Significant differences in the stress fields were found near the fiber/bead contact point due to the geometry and resulting z-location of the vise. In addition, the vise angle and interphase properties were varied to examine their influence. As the vise angle increases, the combined state of stress decreases considerably. The effect of the interphase, while not as significant as the effect of the vise angle, did produce a 10% variation in von-Mises stress at the fiber/bead contact point for the properties used. It was found that the ratio of the maximum shear to average shear equaled 4 near the fiber/bead contact point. At this location the interfacial material has yielded with a von-Mises stress 8× the average shear. Finally, results are provided showing the average interfacial shear stress value obtained by the FEM is within 2% of the theoretical solution.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Plueddemann · 1991
2. Tensile properties of fibre-reinforced metals10.1016/0022-5096(65)90035-9 ↗
3. Drzal LT, Rich MJ, Camping JD, Park WJ. Interfacial shear strength and failure mechanisms in graphite fiber composites. In: 35th Conference of Reinforced Plastics/Composites Institute. New York (USA): Society of the Plastics Industry; 1980. Paper 20C.
4. Mandell JF, Chen JH, McGarry FJ. A microdebonding test for in-situ fiber-matrix bond strength and moisture effects. In: 35th Conference of Reinforced Plastics/Composites Institute. New York (USA) Society of the Plastics Industry; 1980. Paper 26D.
5. Modified microdebonding test for direct in situ fiber/matrix bond strength determination in fiber composites
6. Carbon fiber adhesion to organic matrices10.1007/BF00550192 ↗
7. The glass fibre-polymer interface10.1016/0266-3538(85)90089-2 ↗
8. A microbond method for determination of the shear strength of a fiber/resin interface10.1016/0266-3538(87)90059-5 ↗
9. Microbond method for determination of the shear strength of a fiber/resin interface10.1016/0266-3538(89)90076-6 ↗
10. Measurement and mechanical aspects of the microbond pull-out technique for obtaining fiber/resin interfacial shear strength10.1016/0266-3538(91)90018-K ↗
11. Day RJ. Modelling of the micromechanics of the microbond test.
12. A finite-element model of the use of the microbond test method for characterization of composite interfacial properties
13. New method of determining contact angle between monofilament and liquid10.1002/app.1975.070191025 ↗
14. The accurate measurement of contact angle, phase contact areas, drop volume, and Laplace excess pressure in drop-on-fiber systems10.1016/0021-9797(76)90227-7 ↗
15. The effect of microvise gap width on microbond pull-out test results10.1016/0266-3538(94)90161-9 ↗
16. Sensitivity studies of the interfacial shear strength in composite materials using the microbond test
17. Investigation of the micromechanics of the microbond test10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00197-8 ↗
18. Comparison of methods for the measurement of fibre/matrix adhesion in composites10.1016/0010-4361(92)90282-Y ↗
19. Study of the interface in Kevlar 49-epoxy composites by means of microbond and fragmentation tests10.1007/BF00367590 ↗
20. Fracture mechanics analysis of the microbond test10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00044-X ↗
21. Carroll · Textile Research J. · 1977 · 47 · 5610.1177/004051757704700810 ↗
22. Spreading of liquid droplets on cylindrical surfaces10.1063/1.345689 ↗
23. A generalized drop length-height method for determination of contact angle in drop-on-fiber systems10.1006/jcis.1997.5218 ↗
24. Beyer · 1987
25. Weisstein · 1999
26. The effect of interphase curing on interphase properties and formation10.1080/00218460213736 ↗
27. ‘Complete' system monitoring of polymer matrix composites10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00044-0 ↗
28. A new fiber sensor for in-situ near-infrared monitoring of polymer matrix composites
29. Kumar R, Cross WM, Kjerengtroen L, Kellar JJ. Fiber bias in nanoindentation of polymer matrix composites. Compos Interfaces [in press].10.1163/1568554042246215 ↗
30. Determining interphase size and properties in polymer matrix composites using phase imaging atomic force microscopy and nanoindentation10.1163/156856100743248 ↗
31. Hibbit, Karlson & Sorensen, Inc. Section 21.2.4: Defining Tied Contact. ABAQUS Standard User's Manual Vol. III, Ver. 6.1 2000.
32. The vice angle in the microbond test10.1023/A:1026787012473 ↗
33. Improvements to the microdroplet single fibre composite test10.1023/A:1006659905507 ↗
34. The microdroplet test10.1163/156855498X00379 ↗
35. Kellar JJ, Cross WM, Johnson FJ, Connell ME. Method of using thin-clad near infrared transparent optical glass fibers as evanescent wave sensors. US Patent #6198861 B1; 2001.
36. Calculation of Young's modulus of elasticity from composition of simple and complex silicate glass
37. Phillips · 1941
38. Parker · 1967
39. Micromechanics of materials-removal mechanisms from brittle surfaces: substrate damage and surface microroughness. LLE Review. Available from: http//www.lle.rochester.edu/pub/review/v74/7_74micro.pdf; Last accessed: 7-2-01.
40. Surface microroughness of optical glasses under deterministic microgrinding. LLE Review. Available from: http//www.lle.rochester.edu/pub/review/v66/66-surface.pdf; Last accessed: 7-2-01.
41. Schott optical glass catalog. Available from:http//www.us.schott.com/english/download/index.html; Last accessed: 7-2-01.
42. Matthews · 1999
43. Application of the microbond technique10.1002/pen.760311704 ↗