On the influence of fiber shape in bone-shaped short-fiber composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Composite materials reinforced by bone-shaped short (BSS) fibers enlarged at both ends are well-known to have significantly better strength and toughness than those reinforced by conventional, short, straight (CSS) fibers with the same aspect ratio. Comparing the fracture characteristics of double-cantilever-beam specimens made of BSS and CSS fiber composites reveals the distinct mechanisms responsible for the toughness enhancement provided by the BSS fiber reinforcement. Enlarged BSS fiber ends anchor the fiber in the matrix and lead to a significantly higher stress to pull out than that required for CSS fibers, altering crack propagation characteristics. To study BSS fiber-bridging capability further, we examine the effects of increasing the size of the enlarged fiber end on the pull-out characteristics and identify the sequence of failure mechanisms involved in the pull-out process. However, large microcracks initiated at the enlarged ends can potentially mask the toughening enhancements provided by BSS fibers. To understand the influence of fiber-end geometry on debond initiation at the fiber ends, we analyze the interfacial stresses around fiber ends varying in geometry using an elastic finite-element model. We note a bound to these in terms of the Eshelby and Kelvin elastic solutions.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Material Mechanics · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Mechanical properties of bone-shaped short fiber reinforced composites10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00071-3 ↗
2. Zhu YT, Valdez JA, Shi N, Lovato ML, Stout MG, Zhou S., et al. A composite reinforced with bone-shaped short fibers. Scripta Materialia 1998: 381321–25.10.1016/S1359-6462(98)00063-3 ↗
3. Zhu YT, Valdez JA, Shi N, Lovato ML, Stout MG, Zhou S., et al. Influence of reinforcement morphology on the mechanical properties of short-fiber composites. In: Li BQ, editor. Processing of metals and advanced materials: modeling, design and properties. The Metal Society, 1998. p. 251–9.
4. Strength and toughness of bone-shaped steel wire reinforced concrete10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00055-5 ↗
5. Ductile reinforcements for enhancing fracture resistance in composite materials10.1016/S0167-8442(00)00003-3 ↗
6. Wetherhold RC, Lee FK. Shaped fibers to improve toughness of composite materials. Composites Science and Technology (in press).
7. Concepts for bridged cracks in fracture and fatigue, overview No. 11110.1016/0956-7151(94)90492-8 ↗
8. Remarks on crack bridging concepts10.1115/1.3119764 ↗
9. Zhu YT, Beyerlein IJ, Valdez JA, Lowe TC. Fracture toughness of a composite reinforced with bone-shaped short fibers. Mater Sci Eng A (in press).10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01166-2 ↗
10. The elasticity and strength of paper and other fibrous materials10.1088/0508-3443/3/3/302 ↗
11. On the theory of fibre strengthening10.1016/0022-5096(70)90028-1 ↗
12. Matrix and interface stresses in a discontinuous fiber composite model10.1177/002199836800200208 ↗
13. Cameron J. Strengthening of composites by shape optimization of discontinuous fibers. In: Upadhya K, editor. High performance metal and ceramic matrix composites. The Metal Society 1994: 85–97.
14. Effective elastic moduli of enlarged-end-fibre-reinforced solids10.1016/0015-0568(81)90016-6 ↗
15. On the pull-out of fibres with enlarged ends10.1016/0015-0568(81)90064-6 ↗
16. A biomimetic model of dumbbell fiber-reinforced composite materials
17. The determination of the elastic field of an ellipsoidal inclusion and related problems10.1098/rspa.1957.0133 ↗