AI-driven residual strength diagnostics of composites using their electrical behavior under low-stress cyclic loading
Source abstract
Abstract
A novel non-destructive testing (NDT) method was developed to predict the residual strength of composites, with unknown histories of fatigue damage, using their electrical behavior during a low stress cyclic loading test. Ninety-five samples, representing a wide range of fatigue damage levels, were prepared and subjected to a low-stress cyclic loading test, as a diagnostic test, while their electrical behavior was monitored. The samples then underwent quasi-static loading until failure to measure their corresponding residual strengths. To establish a relationship between the electrical behavior of samples during the diagnostic test and their corresponding residual strengths, various machine learning techniques were implemented. K-nearest neighbor (KNN), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Regressor (SVR), and Feedforward Artificial Neural Networks were employed in two different approaches: as standalone predictors, and in an ensemble learning approach. The analysis demonstrated that a KNN meta-model, incorporating DT, SVR, and KNN as base models, in an ensemble framework, achieved the best performance, with a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 5.7% in predicting residual strength. This significant performance underscores the potential of our low-stress diagnostic test for predicting the residual strength of composites, even when the fatigue damage history is unknown.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Smart Materials for Construction · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. Fatigue damage tracking and life prediction of fiberglass composites using a laser induced graphene interlayer10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108935 ↗
2. Fracture mechanics and damage mechanics based fatigue lifetime prediction of adhesively bonded joints subjected to variable amplitude fatigue10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.03.008 ↗
3. A critical plane approach for multiaxial fatigue life prediction of short fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108050 ↗
4. Fatigue reliability analysis of composites based on residual strength10.1163/156855106778835212 ↗
5. A method to predict the fatigue life and the residual strength of composite materials subjected to variable amplitude (VA) loadings10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111338 ↗
6. Modeling the residual strength of carbon fiber reinforced composites subjected to cyclic loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.03.012 ↗
7. Vassilopoulos · 2019
8. Mathematical model for the prediction of strength degradation of composites subjected to constant amplitude fatigue10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.06.032 ↗
9. A new theory to predict cumulative fatigue damage in fiberglass reinforced plastics
10. A power law fatigue damage model for fibre-reinforced plastic laminates10.1243/PIME_PROC_1986_200_111_02 ↗
11. Prediction of fatigue resistance of short-fibre-reinforced polymers10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.08.011 ↗
12. Halpin · 1973
13. Proof testing of composite materials10.1177/002199837500900308 ↗
14. Residual strength degradation model and theory of periodic proof tests for graphite/epoxy laminates10.1177/002199837701100205 ↗
15. Life prediction methodology for composite structures. Part II—spectrum fatigue10.1177/002199839703100203 ↗
16. Residual strength after fatigue in composites: theory vs. experiment10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.01.019 ↗
17. A reliable progressive fatigue damage model for life prediction of composite laminates incorporating an adaptive cyclic jump algorithm10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109587 ↗
18. Advancements in fiber-reinforced polymer composite materials damage detection methods: towards achieving energy-efficient SHM systems10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109136 ↗
19. Real-time self-monitoring and smart bend recognizing of fiber-reinforced polymer composites enabled by embedded magnetic fibers10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109869 ↗
20. 17 - structural health monitoring (SHM) of aerospace composites
21. Structural health monitoring in composite structures: a comprehensive review10.3390/s22010153 ↗
22. X-ray microtomography analysis of the damage micromechanisms in 3D woven composites under low-velocity impact10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.09.017 ↗
23. Ultrasonic detection and characterization of delaminations in thin composite plates using signal processing techniques10.1016/S0041-624X(97)00019-X ↗
24. Infrared thermographic evaluation of large composite grid parts subjected to axial loading10.1016/j.polymertesting.2014.10.010 ↗
25. Acoustic emission monitoring of carbon-fiber-reinforced-polymer bridge stay cables in large-scale testing10.1007/BF02323146 ↗
26. Digital image correlation (DIC) based damage detection for CFRP laminates by using machine learning based image semantic segmentation10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107529 ↗
27. Impact localisation with FBG for a self-healing carbon fibre composite structure10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.07.030 ↗
28. Naghashpour · 2014
29. Sensors for process and structural health monitoring of aerospace composites: a review10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112231 ↗
30. Mechanical and thermal properties of carbon nanotubes10.1016/0008-6223(95)00021-5 ↗
31. Developing polymer composite materials: carbon nanotubes or graphene?10.1002/adma.201301926 ↗
32. Mechanical and electrical properties of graphene and carbon nanotube reinforced epoxy adhesives: experimental and numerical analysis10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.02.027 ↗
33. Sensing of damage mechanisms in fiber‐reinforced composites under cyclic loading using carbon nanotubes10.1002/adfm.200800865 ↗
34. Failure detection and monitoring in polymer matrix composites subjected to static and dynamic loads using carbon nanotube networks10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.03.010 ↗
35. Load and health monitoring in glass fibre reinforced composites with an electrically conductive nanocomposite epoxy matrix10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.01.001 ↗
36. In-situ residual strength prediction of composites subjected to fatigue loading10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108490 ↗
37. A survey of artificial intelligence for prognostics
38. Remaining useful life prediction using deep learning approaches: a review10.1016/j.promfg.2020.06.015 ↗
39. Intelligent fatigue damage tracking and prognostics of composite structures utilizing raw images via interpretable deep learning10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111863 ↗
40. Interpreting acoustic emission signals by artificial neural networks to predict the residual strength of pre-fatigued GFRP laminates10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.032 ↗
41. Machine learning process evaluating damage classification of composites
42. Electrical conductivity and resistivity10.1201/9780203009406.ch7 ↗
43. Fisher · 1996
44. Steinwart · 2008
45. KNN model-based approach in classification
46. Classification and regression trees10.1002/widm.8 ↗
47. Random forests and decision trees
48. Xgboost: extreme gradient boosting
49. Small data machine learning in materials science10.1038/s41524-023-01000-z ↗
50. Goodfellow: Deep learning - Google Scholar n.d. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Deep%20learning&author=I.%20Goodfellow&publication_year=2016 (accessed November 20, 2024).
51. 2012
52. Raschka · 2022
53. Damage detection of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites via electrical resistance measurement10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.08.005 ↗
54. Measurement of orthotropic electric conductance of CFRP laminates and analysis of the effect on delamination monitoring with an electric resistance change method10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00019-2 ↗